• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

MX (Peacekeeper) deployment concepts.

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
9,029
Reaction score
204
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a956120.pdf
 

flateric

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
8,804
Reaction score
259
some seine-fishing at ePay
 

Attachments

Michel Van

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
4,276
Reaction score
105
i found another deployment concept on MX

According to the (very limited) documentation I've found, ORCA was going to be canisterized MX missiles tethered to the ocean floor on the continental shelf. No manpower on site, just a canister and a tether. Never implemented because it violated the Seabed Treaty and was vulnerable to attack without corresponding advantages. I've never found anything about deep sea basing, but it wouldn't surprise me - they considered everything else, after all.
Thanks to Asnys from Alternate History forum for the info.
 

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,723
Reaction score
219
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Comparisons of 30 Department of Defense ICBM basing modes from a Center for Defense Information publication circa 1981.

Source:
http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/5397/icbm-basing-modes
 

Attachments

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
9,029
Reaction score
204
In regards to earlier discussions of hovercraft mounted or carried MX missiles on this thread, Orion came across this sometime ago:
http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=9544
 

Orionblamblam

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
7,418
Reaction score
277
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
Tom Clancy's notion for an MX-launching hovercraft:

The Floating Shell Game: Tom Clancy’s 1982 Plan to Fire Nuclear Weapons from a Hovercraft - See more at: http://news.usni.org/2013/10/02/floating-shell-game-tom-clancys-1982-plan-fire-nuclear-weapons-hovercraft#sthash.Jv6gQF9t.dpuf
The Floating Shell Game: Tom Clancy’s 1982 Plan to Fire Nuclear Weapons from a Hovercraft - See more at: http://news.usni.org/2013/10/02/floating-shell-game-tom-clancys-1982-plan-fire-nuclear-weapons-hovercraft#sthash.Jv6gQF9t.dpufThe Floating Shell Game: Tom Clancy’s 1982 Plan to Fire Nuclear Weapons from a Hovercraft



The Floating Shell Game: Tom Clancy’s 1982 Plan to Fire Nuclear Weapons from a Hovercraft - See more at: http://news.usni.org/2013/10/02/floating-shell-game-tom-clancys-1982-plan-fire-nuclear-weapons-hovercraft#sthash.Jv6gQF9t.dpuf
 

Attachments

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
154
Well, that's a delightfully wacky concept.
 

quellish

I am not actually here.
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
2,067
Reaction score
24
TomS said:
Well, that's a delightfully wacky concept.
Wasn't the only time that hovercraft were considered for this mission, and not the wackiest ICBM deployment or survivability concept by a long shot.
 

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
154
True. But I think the drawing is pretty bizarre -- it looks to be a baseline LCAC, which couldn't even carry a bare MX, much less one with realistic environmental protection, erection gear, and launch support hardware. Even the stretched LCAC discussed would be very ahrd when you think about the mass of the supportin equipment needed.

That, and the idea that air cushion cheicles can traverse land obstacles as easily as they can cross waves.
 

SOC

I look at pictures all day
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
1,178
Reaction score
8
Am I the only one that thinks the LCAC transforms into a submarine when the MX is fired?
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
12,317
Reaction score
426
SOC said:
Am I the only one that thinks the LCAC transforms into a submarine when the MX is fired?
I was thinking more along the lines of one of those cars in the new Superman movie.
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
12,317
Reaction score
426
 
Last edited:

quellish

I am not actually here.
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
2,067
Reaction score
24
SOC said:
Am I the only one that thinks the LCAC transforms into a submarine when the MX is fired?
Actually, I think it transforms into a very easy to find target.
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
12,317
Reaction score
426
quellish said:
SOC said:
Am I the only one that thinks the LCAC transforms into a submarine when the MX is fired?
Actually, I think it transforms into a very easy to find target.
Given that it would be somewhere in the Southwest desert I'm not sure it would matter. It would be long gone by the time any weapon cued from observing the launch would be overhead.
 

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,723
Reaction score
219
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Martin Marietta Peacekeeper model with bronze coin found on eBay. Legitimate for collectors?


Source:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-Martin-Marietta-1-50-Scale-Peacekeeper-Desk-Rocket-Model-w-Bronze-Coin-/281588851651?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item419000e3c3

Seller's description:

RARE Martin Marietta Rocket Desk Model, 1/50th Scale
Peacekeeper with Bronze Coin
Condition: No damage aside from normal wear.

We sell many used items that have typical day to day wear. We make mention of any significant damage, cracks, break, repairs, chipping, fading, or flaws. If you have any questions regarding the specifics, please, contact us anytime. We are more then happy to assure you of the quality of the product.

* If you would like additional photos, please let us know 24 hours before auction close
* Payment is required within 10 days of auction close
* If the is any problem with any item we sell please let us know immediately! We will respond within 24 hours and will do everything we can to resolve the issue.

Piece is 18 Inches x 8 Inches x 8 Inches.
 

Attachments

moin1900

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
458
Reaction score
4
Silo defense
Gau-8 CIWS and SWARMjet rockets against soviet warheads
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3KZiW589nI
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
12,317
Reaction score
426
I knew I'd read somewhere back in the day about using a GAU-8 to protect silos. Was starting to wonder if I'd imagined it. ;D
 

phil gollin

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Messages
203
Reaction score
4
.


This is possibly of interest ;


http://www.amazon.co.uk/Untaken-Road-Strategy-Technology-Transforming/dp/1612519733/ref=sr_1_259?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1431276894&sr=1-259


.
 

bobbymike

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
9,118
Reaction score
230
Phil - very nice added to wish list. Here is Amazon US

http://www.amazon.com/Untaken-Road-Strategy-Technology-Transforming/dp/1612519733/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1431291414&sr=8-1&keywords=the+untaken+road
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
12,317
Reaction score
426
Hopefully it's more than just a printing of "Echos That Never Were - American Mobile ICBMs 1956 - 1983"
 

Orionblamblam

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
7,418
Reaction score
277
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
sferrin said:
Hopefully it's more than just a printing of "Echos That Never Were - American Mobile ICBMs 1956 - 1983"
Same author, so it's not unlikely. However, I'd bet on improved image quality at the very least
 

bobbymike

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
9,118
Reaction score
230
Orionblamblam said:
sferrin said:
Hopefully it's more than just a printing of "Echos That Never Were - American Mobile ICBMs 1956 - 1983"
Same author, so it's not unlikely. However, I'd bet on improved image quality at the very least
Thought I recognized the name. Yes maybe if it's fully updated with some great drawings and pictures would be nice addition to my 'nuclear' library.
 

bobbymike

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
9,118
Reaction score
230
sferrin and other SPF members.

Has anyone come across studies (or study) of super hard silo concepts? I thought I had something that talked about 50k psi possible? I've seen snippets but wondering about full studies.
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
12,317
Reaction score
426
bobbymike said:
sferrin and other SPF members.

Has anyone come across studies (or study) of super hard silo concepts? I thought I had something that talked about 50k psi possible? I've seen snippets but wondering about full studies.
There was an article in Air Force magazine back in the 80s about them. 50ksi is right. They even had a picture where they'd done a simulation with high explosives. Showed the concrete tube sticking out of the bottom of a crater.

http://scienceandglobalsecurity.org/archive/sgs02michener.pdf

From the footnotes in this article it looks like the Air Force Magazine article was January of '84
 

marauder2048

"I should really just relax"
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
2,332
Reaction score
78
They conducted a sub-scale (intended to simulate a 55,000 psi overpressure i.e. a direct hit from a ~ 1 Mt warhead) test on a superhardened silo constructed with Slurry Infiltrated Fiber Concrete (SIFCON). Not the best photo reproduction in the report but plenty of details.

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a195351.pdf

* One of the amusing remarks in the referring documents was that fiscal and political pressure were much harder to counter than overpressure.
 

bobbymike

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
9,118
Reaction score
230
sferrin & marauder2048 THANKS much for the links. Why this is my favorite all time site amazing members.
 

bobbymike

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
9,118
Reaction score
230
Why a basing mode wasn't selected.

http://www.lanl.gov/discover/publications/national-security-science/2015-july/_assets/doc/NSS-jul2015-mxfactor.pdf
 

fightingirish

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
2,164
Reaction score
153
Alternate MX Basing Concepts Weighed
Washington—Alternate basing concepts are being considered for the USAF/Martin Marietta MX advanced intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) by high-level Pentagon officials as possible hedges to the linear grid system in the southwestern U. S. now favored by the Carter Administration.
By CLARENCE A. ROBINSON
Source: Aviation Week, October 27th, 1980, pages 19-21
Link (Login!): http://archive.aviationweek.com/issue/19801027/#!&pid=18
 

Attachments

fightingirish

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
2,164
Reaction score
153
ICBM Survivability Aid Studied
Two concepts that would allow orbital, aerodynamic cruise loiter of Minuteman weighed to counter preemptive strike
By CLARENCE A. ROBINSON
Source: Aviation Week, February 25th, 1980, pages 16-18
Link: http://archive.aviationweek.com/issue/19800225#!&pid=16
 

Attachments

Kat Tsun

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
85
Reaction score
3
The hardest basing options I've seen for the MX were the various super hard silos, I believe 3,500 atm hard silos were actually built, or otherwise considered "certainly achievable", and 7,000 atm were considered "possible"; the Deep Base, where MX missiles would be stationed about half a mile and change underground along with Air Force crewmen, base personnel, and a team of tunnel bore crews, after the bombs fell the crews would dig themselves out egress tubes over several months, eventually break the surface, and fire their missiles; and the Deep Silo/Hard Rock basing, of which LANL's "Pencil Pusher" could resist surface bursts up to 100 megatons, while Boeing's "Sand Silo" could resist 25 megatons, both presumably direct impacts.

https://books.google.com/books?id=Zz8rAAAAYAAJ
https://books.google.com/books?id=VD8rAAAAYAAJ
https://books.google.com/books?id=PJf2jZbIPjcC&pg=PA267&lpg=PA267&dq=super+hard+silo+50,000+psi&source=bl&ots=N2DI3yPUb3&sig=zQ5N2zx2C6zgCxWfWUT1XOE9XNQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiXtdOdjbzRAhXJ7YMKHRpKDDwQ6AEIHjAB#v=onepage&q=super%20hard%20silo%2050%2C000%20psi&f=false

I'm not sure how good these Google book scans are, what's omitted I mean, but they contain enough info for what I talked about.
 

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,723
Reaction score
219
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
MX Missile 1977 US Air Force; LGM-118A Peacekeeper ICBM Overview from "Aerospace Power"

https://youtu.be/Wgm68bW8jG4
 
Top