Jump Jet: The Secret History of the Harrier

I am at the IWM summer airshow at Duxford today. Wearing my very cool Jump Jet T-shirt! Happy to chat if you are there and spot me.

Travelling via this place. Harrier vibes galore!

Looking forward to seeing a B-25 Mitchell, which played a surprising part in the creation of the Harrier.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20260704_073452.jpg
    IMG_20260704_073452.jpg
    3.8 MB · Views: 118
  • images (8).jpeg
    images (8).jpeg
    50.1 KB · Views: 63
Duxford today was fab.

A personal fave was the shimmering, silver B-25J.

One of the things I discovered for my book was if there had been no Mitchell there may have been no Harrier. The connection came from Catch-22.

If anyone is at the show tomorrow the IWM bookshop, Aviation Bookshop tent and on-site second hand book hut opposite the AB tent, all have free Jump Jet bookmarks to give out. Buy any book and pick one up!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20260704_162831.jpg
    IMG_20260704_162831.jpg
    3.9 MB · Views: 69
Sounds like an utterly deserved good operational run to me.

I might have spoken too soon: four AV-8B Harriers flew above me in tight formation this morning, during the NYC flyovers in celebration of Independence Day / the Semiquincentennial. I couldn't make out the Harriers' low-visibility markings. They might have been Italian or Spanish, instead of USMC.
 
Duxford today was fab.
A personal fave was the shimmering, silver B-25J.
One of the things I discovered for my book was if there had been no Mitchell there may have been no Harrier. The connection came from Catch-22.
If anyone is at the show tomorrow the IWM bookshop, Aviation Bookshop tent and on-site second hand book hut opposite the AB tent, all have free Jump Jet bookmarks to give out. Buy any book and pick one up!

The sprawling Imperial War Museum Duxford is perhaps the greatest air museum in the world; I loved my visit in 2018. But we're tied up today, Brits!

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yy0q2lAggHI&t=21s
 
I might have spoken too soon: four AV-8B Harriers flew above me in tight formation this morning, during the NYC flyovers in celebration of Independence Day / the Semiquincentennial. I couldn't make out the Harriers' low-visibility markings. They might have been Italian or Spanish, instead of USMC.

The itemized list from @H_K confirms that the four Harriers overhead in NYC this morning were from Spain's naval air arm.
 
I am looking forward to reading this book of course, since the author has been such a good read here for so many years.
Thick small hardbacks are not my favourite bookshelf items. Peter Hennessy's wonderful Silent Deep survived about three months of hard reading, perusing and referring. Fortunately Oxfam sold me an affordable spare clean copy.
Picture books survive longer as they can be read easier in bed or a comfy place. Harrier is a fascinating subject and it will be good to read an inside account of the various issues-technical and political.
As the author knows I am an unapologetic fan of P1154 so am perhaps not as enthusiastic about P1127RAF. The naval version was just bonkers but P1154RN in model form graces my shelves too.
There are occasions where I think VSTOL sucked money away from more useful aircraft in the RAF. P1154 CTOL would have been feasible in 1962 and served to save money on Phantoms and Jaguars. P1127RAF was an expensive toy, Healey and the RAF were right to want more Phantoms/Jaguars. Finally, if we had spent the money poured into F35B and the carriers on a proper Tornado replacement and a balanced surface/submarine fleet we might be in better shape. But I shall enjoy Michael setting me straight.
 
I passed this on to Penguin and they will see if the updated date can appear on Amazon.com - it is correct on Amazon.co.uk

Oddly, such things used to be my job in the late 90s, when I worked for the company contracted to support setting up the UK side of Amazon. Turns out even an 'e business' doesn't run on pure data!
The response from my editor at Penguin, Rowland White:
----------------------------
I’d suggest that you recommend to eager US customers that they just order from amazon.co.uk. They won’t qualify for free delivery through prime, but they will get it soonest.

I’m not sure about the reason for the disparity between the US and Canadian dates except that, as part of the commonwealth, we export directly through Penguin Canada while in the US, we use a distributor.

The ebook and audiobook will be available in north America on the UK publication date.
-------------------------------
 
Last edited:

There are occasions where I think VSTOL sucked money away from more useful aircraft in the RAF. P1154 CTOL would have been feasible in 1962 and served to save money on Phantoms and Jaguars. P1127RAF was an expensive toy, Healey and the RAF were right to want more Phantoms/Jaguars. Finally, if we had spent the money poured into F35B and the carriers on a proper Tornado replacement and a balanced surface/submarine fleet we might be in better shape. But I shall enjoy Michael setting me straight.
V/STOL blasphemy! Ban uk75 immediately ;)

F-35B and CVF/QE class have always been a poor example of V/STOL operations as you can directly compare them with their CV catapult and arrestor versions.

I’d argue that each service is guilty of pouring money away and failing to deliver a balanced capability. It’s all a bit embarrassing. Good job I stopped worrying about it in the noughties and just enjoy the books about how it could have been :D
 
I made an ad for the book but wonder if these things really work.

Would prospective readers prefer things like chapter lists etc. rather than blurbs?

This is an AI prototype. Printed copies for an actual photo due soon.
 

Attachments

  • 1783623148577.png
    1783623148577.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 49
Last edited:
The spine doesn’t look right and you need to get the word insane in there at least once ;)

More seriously chapter list teasers work for me.
 
The spine doesn’t look right and you need to get the word insane in there at least once ;)

More seriously chapter list teasers work for me.
Yeah, AI does wonky stuff but a real photo should be fine.

By teasers do you mean more than just the titles?
 
Yeah, AI does wonky stuff but a real photo should be fine.

By teasers do you mean more than just the titles?
If the chapter title doesn’t make it obvious what it’s about I like a short overview like the contents page you get in a magazine.
 
If the chapter title doesn’t make it obvious what it’s about I like a short overview like the contents page you get in a magazine
Its narrative non-fiction ("like a thriller" Joe Coles of Hush-Kit says) so chapter titles make sense for the story, but a summary of events would work before you read them. E.g. one covers the 1963 Paris airshow P.1127 crash and is called 'Down in Paris'.
(I also wrote that chapter where George Orwell finished 1984 - I liked the link to one of his earlier books).
 
The editor of the article above added this pic.

Good grief.

Readers of the book will discover my views on AI, and its surprisingly old role in jump jet design.

1784043389149.jpeg
 
Another version of the Waterstones offer ad. Same info it seems.
 

Attachments

  • f0c756fa-d49e-4683-ad97-0ded15df9ab5.png
    f0c756fa-d49e-4683-ad97-0ded15df9ab5.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 16
Penguin have just sent me a blurb for Jump Jet from John Nichol, author of Spitfire, Lancaster and Tornado:

"A fascinating, insightful and revealing history of this iconic British jet"

Very nice to hear that from a bestselling author, plus it's still 25% off pre-orders at Waterstones
https://www.waterstones.com/book/jump-jet/michael-pryce/9780241738078
 

Attachments

  • 22072e4f-9ee2-4d04-a17b-0914fe9db435.png
    22072e4f-9ee2-4d04-a17b-0914fe9db435.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 24
Just home from holiday and found this waiting.

It's odd seeing stuff from your laptop turned into a real, physicaI, book, but I like it. In particular the chapter opening pics work really well in the flesh. There's lots of colour pics too.

One reveals a properly secret project, declassified for the book. A Mach 3.5 jump jet from 1964 - the Hawker Siddeley team at Kingston thought the P.1154 was just a stepping stone.

Jump Jet tries a different way of telling stories about secret projects. Written like a novel, it takes you inside the design offices where V/STOL fighters were created, and into the minds of the designers who fought to create them, and puts you in the cockpit with the pilots who flew them, in both tests and combat.

I will flesh out chapter outlines here soon, but in the meantime, if you have questions, please do just ask.

"A fascinating, insightful and revealing history of this iconic British jet"
John Nichol, bestselling author of Spitfire, Lancaster, Tornado and Blitz

"I read Jump Jet with considerable interest and admiration ... the most comprehensive history yet. I can’t imagine it being superseded”
James Hamilton-Paterson, author of Empire of the Clouds

Pre-orders now open - www.jumpjetpenguin.com
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20260725_223303.jpg
    IMG_20260725_223303.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 31
  • IMG_20260725_223326.jpg
    IMG_20260725_223326.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 38
  • IMG_20260725_224139.jpg
    IMG_20260725_224139.jpg
    2.5 MB · Views: 42
  • IMG_20260725_224630.jpg
    IMG_20260725_224630.jpg
    136.7 KB · Views: 41
  • IMG_20260725_225247.jpg
    IMG_20260725_225247.jpg
    3.3 MB · Views: 42
Last edited:
Images for above post in daylight.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20260726_092410.jpg
    IMG_20260726_092410.jpg
    3.8 MB · Views: 28
  • IMG_20260726_092725.jpg
    IMG_20260726_092725.jpg
    4 MB · Views: 27
  • IMG_20260726_093143.jpg
    IMG_20260726_093143.jpg
    3.8 MB · Views: 26
  • IMG_20260726_093232.jpg
    IMG_20260726_093232.jpg
    4.5 MB · Views: 45
  • IMG_20260726_093319.jpg
    IMG_20260726_093319.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 44
Last edited:
A bit late, mine from Amazon. Signed bookmark?
 
Looks like Amazon US is only offering the Kindle and Audiobook versions for preorder, not the hardcover, for some reason...
 

Attachments

  • jump1.jpg
    jump1.jpg
    71.1 KB · Views: 8
  • jump2.jpg
    jump2.jpg
    63.8 KB · Views: 18
There's a lot in my book about the techno-politics of aviation. Some quotes from Duncan Sandys (and a hint of scandal). Julian Amery's wild reasons for supporting TSR.2, and Roy Jenkins' outrageous language on cancelling the P.1154. All add colour and detail to some of what we already know.

The big one, though, is Maggie Thatcher. As a trained scientist, and one whose work actually found its way onto the Harrier, you would hope she was more sensitive to how fighters are designed.

You'd be wrong. She was impulsive, opinionated and, while seeking to soak up post-Falklands glory, as susceptible to the British state's obsession with analysis and data over common sense as many of those she criticised. She was also pretty easy for industrial interests to 'play' to get what they wanted, to fill their factories, rather than what the front-line needed.

The result was to go ahead with a European project, EFA, now Typhoon, over what the RAF and RN really wanted and had written requirements for - ASTOVL.

The first picture here shows her in a Harrier cockpit at Kingston in December 1982. The second picture shows a key moment when her lack of imagination changed everything. After lunch that day, the knife went into hopes for US/UK development of the supersonic P.1216 ASTOVL jump jet with McDonnell Douglas - the year before Kingston designers had been embedded at St Louis on a joint future project for the US Navy. It is the moment that the path changed, leading us to Typhoon and the F-35B.

The book tries to show such moments, and explain their causes and impacts, as well as how politics mixes with technical issues. Mrs T had views on wingtip missiles, but how she got them is the real story.

Pics are copyright BAE Systems, and both are in my book - out in just over three weeks. Pre-orders open at www.jumpjetpenguin.com
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20260730_085248~2.jpg
    IMG_20260730_085248~2.jpg
    951.2 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_20260730_182751.jpg
    IMG_20260730_182751.jpg
    767.3 KB · Views: 28
Last edited:
There's a lot in my book about the techno-politics of aviation. Some quotes from Duncan Sandys (and a hint of scandal). Julian Amery's wild reasons for supporting TSR.2, and Roy Jenkins outrageous language on cancelling the P.1154. All add colour and detail to some of what we already know.

The big one, though, is Maggie Thatcher. As a trained scientist, and one whose work actually found its way onto the Harrier, you would hope she was more sensitive to how fighters are designed.

You'd be wrong. She was impulsive, opinionated and, while seeking to soak up post-Falklands glory, as susceptible to the British state's obsession with analysis and data over common sense as many of those she criticised. She was also pretty easy for industrial interests to 'play' to get what they wanted, to fill their factories, rather than what the front-line needed.

The result was to go ahead with a European project, EFA, now Typhoon, over what the RAF and RN really wanted and had written requirements for - ASTOVL.

The first picture here shows her in a Harrier cockpit at Kingston in December 1982. The second picture shows a key moment when her lack of imagination changed everything. After lunch that day, the knife went into hopes for US/UK development of the supersonic P.1216 ASTOVL jump jet with McDonnell Douglas - the year before Kingston designers had been embedded at St Louis on a joint future project for the US Navy. It is the moment that the path changed, leading us to Typhoon and the F-35B.

The book tries to show such moments, and explain their causes and impacts, as well as how politics mixes with technical issues. Mrs T had views on wingtip missiles, but how she got them is the real story.

Pics are copyright BAE Systems, and both are in my book - out in just over three weeks. Pre-orders open at www.jumpjetpenguin.com
I knew it ! I knew that P.1216 had been proposed to DARPA ASTOVL ! That's amazing.

And yeah, it wouldn't have had "collided" with the Rafale, at least not the same way. Do you think the Spanish and Italian navies would have adopted the P.1216 besides their AV-8Bs ?
 
I knew it ! I knew that P.1216 had been proposed to DARPA ASTOVL ! That's amazing.

And yeah, it wouldn't have had "collided" with the Rafale, at least not the same way. Do you think the Spanish and Italian navies would have adopted the P.1216 besides their AV-8Bs ?
It was before DARPA ASTOVL. In fact, Maggie's decision created that as a consolation prize. The work with the US Navy was to replace the F-14 and A-6 much sooner. The trick was getting something that would work on smaller UK/Spanish/Italian carriers (Garibaldi had funny lift supports).
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom