Alternatively, the calculations were based on 6'' shells of a theoretical "modern design" (similar to shells for 16'' guns) rather than the actual shells of that caliber in the IJN's inventory, which dated back to 1912.
 
Alternatively, the calculations were based on 6'' shells of a theoretical "modern design" (similar to shells for 16'' guns) rather than the actual shells of that caliber in the IJN's inventory, which dated back to 1912.
Yeah Yes, 本砲ノ甲鉄ハ6"GUN耐へ得モノトセルモ其厚ノ決定ハ16"GUN'shellニ準ジラ優秀ナル弾丸トシテ計画 means There is no shell that theoretical excellent things at 16" or 6". Hiraga say that not need so thick amor.
 
I'm inclined to think abouth the design as IJN's "super-Omahas", ie recce cruisers to work with the battle line
- a few planes for long range work in good weather,
- very fast
- high density of fire on front and aft bearings but limited ammo
- sloped front and aft bulkheads - might actually provide decent protection against 6'' shells.
So a different purpose than US CL/CVs projects from 1930s
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom