FighterJock
ACCESS: Above Top Secret
- Joined
- 29 October 2007
- Messages
- 6,692
- Reaction score
- 7,914
Well let's wait and see what happens pagliacci it will be interesting to see if they can develop the AMCA into an operational fighter.
How hard would it be to make a really efficient new engine to propel that dagger to M 2.4 ?Wonder why not a F414 derivative, considering that GE already did homework for 12kn EPE variant.
Do we know whether the AMCA will use GaAs or GaN? It is already behind schedule (by that, I mean the IAF needed it like yesterday), so I don’t see them opting for any kind of fancier material or technology.The J-35/A also uses GaN based AESA radar. Together with the later iterations of the J-20 they are the only two 5th gen fighters with GaN radars currently. KF-21 also has a GaN based radar but it isn't a 5th gen fighter.
F-35 Block 4 should get the GaN based AN/APG-85 and the Murad-600 is also going to be GaN based.
"Su-30MKI UPG"? Does such a thing exist?The radar to be used on Su-30MKI UPG is an upscaled variant of Uttam.
It's called Virupaksha.
It has 2500 TRM modules. GaN HEMT. Vivaldi antenna elements. UWB.
According to stealth flanker calculations, it's the most powerful and longest ranging aesa mmr for a fighter ac in existence today.
"Su-30MKI UPG"? Does such a thing exist?
Ok. These two words - "Super Sukhoi" - have been flying through the media for at least 10 years, maybe more.MLU of Sukhoi. Media calls the project Super Sukhoi.
Many sensors and LRUs that will be installed on MKI have already been developed or are under development now.
Ok. These two words - "Super Sukhoi" - have been flying through the media for at least 10 years, maybe more.
But does such a thing exist?
It isn't in existence (i.e. deployed and of operational value), and, as far as we can tell, it isn't even in flight testing.According to stealth flanker calculations, it's the most powerful and longest ranging aesa mmr for a fighter ac in existence today.
Yeah, given how we now see whole new sub generation of aircraft entering service in China this year, Uttam fairytales are a bit tiring....just like there is nothing like "Uttam radar".
...just like there is nothing like "Uttam radar".
Isn't the Uttam radar for the tejas mk1a delayed? I heard for the first batch of tejas mk1a fighters they will be equipped with israeli radars instead.As of March 2021, the basic variant of Tejas has flown for 230 hours on Tejas and the aerial radar test bed.
In April last year, Dr Jitendra Yadav has stated in an interview that Uttam radar has logged 120 sorties on a Tejas LRIP jet. He has also stated on record that it's performance was as good as the Elta EL/M-2052 aesa radar.
This basic version had 768 TRM. The one going into series production has 912 TRM.
This is the basic variant that has been flying for more than 5 yrs.View attachment 777106View attachment 777107
Besides we have multiple ground based radars that use GaN HEMT.
Isn't the Uttam radar for the tejas mk1a delayed? I heard for the first batch of tejas mk1a fighters they will be equipped with israeli radars instead.
certification of the indigenous EW suite hasn't been completed
Uttam Mk1 has been ready for quite some time.
…
Uttam Mk1 has been ready for quite some time.
No offense, but I highly doubt the possibility of both arguments being true at the same time...
Well, but why then do the latest Report say, the IAF decided to use an Israeli radon instead?!
he says "the discussions are still underway with HAL to see if UTTAM radar can be put in from 41st. we are still hopeful".
he says "the discussions are still underway with HAL to see if UTTAM radar can be put in from 41st. we are still hopeful".
letter of intents don't mean much if they're not actualized by orders and the man in the video doesn't seem to be highly confident of it.
View attachment 777371
Point 2: AMCA Contract will be awarded in the next 3-6 months to build the prototype.
Point 3: means that Development of AMCA prototype & induction will take 10 years. (Apparently the media took twisted his word/he didn't mean prototype will take 10 years)
Based off of India's track record, I reckon 10 years is highly optimistic to go from awarding contract by 2025 end to induction by 2035. Personally Expect late 2030s early 2040s.
First prototype rollout by 2027 end and FF in 2028 is highly optimistic.Few points here.
1. GoI has already sanctioned the requisite funds for AMCA last year. The said funds have been disbursed by MoD Defence accounts to ADA.
2. The rollout of the 4 prototypes and their flight test campaigns have nothing to do with the AMCA contract signature. Rs 15000 cr has already been earmarked for this project last year when CCS cleared the AMCA project.
3. According to latest timelines from Aero India 2025, ADA plans to roll out the first prototype in 2027 end and have FF in 2028.
4. Unlike other VLO jets, CDR for AMCA had already been completed by the time CCS approval came last year.
First prototype rollout by 2027 end and FF in 2028 is highly optimistic.
Wasn't Tejas mk2 funds sanctioned in 2022, rollout is supposed to be by end of 2025 with FF by Q1 2026. That's 3 years from sanctioned funds to rollout for a fighter jet that is far less complex than AMCA.
If AMCA had the requisite funds sanctioned in 2024, based on India's track record, prototype roll out by 2027 and FF by 2028 is not realistic. AMCA is nearly 2x larger than tejas mk2, uses two engines instead of one. Has far more complex systems and requires far more advanced parts from many vendors compared to tejas mk2.
If it takes 3 years for Tejas mk2, I suspect AMCA prototype will take 5 years to manufacture. This will be very easily testable. If tejas mk2 is not seen by Q4 2025. I will suspect that AMCA timeline is not realistic at all.
I am already reminded that the original Tejas mk2 timeline has slightly slipped before the revised timeline for FF by Q1 2026. So most likely AMCA will have delays too.
Again only time will tell.
theprint.in
Wouldn't say it's a copy
Seeing as the AMCA still retains the centerline Ball IRST like the Su-57 and not an EOTS, it seems at least the Mk1 variant has less strict LO requirements than it's peers. Above the KF-21 but below the J-35.
I don't believe there is enough space for a SWB, im sure the ADA engineers have thought about their requirements, and have deemed the center weapons bay enough. The J-35 also does not possess any SWB's, they are of similar size, and I don't believe the volume permits it so.
I avoid politics, taunting, etc which derails the subjects & focus only on tech aspects, so i would say that certain features become basic for all stealth jets like 'planform design', EOTS, DAS, HMDS, flush sensors, perhaps DSI, etc, etc. So J-35, J-20, AMCA, KF-21, Kaan have subset of these features.
All Civil jets are also identical with tubular body & typical shape wings best for subsonic flight, the position of engines & stabs vary.
We're yet to see radical Videogame like designs.
Otherwise the Chinese have been accused to copy F-22 & F-35, but i never participated in making spark an inferno & getting sandwiched b/w people from different countries. On tech forum it is best to focus on tech.