GW series of British Missile Cruisers

Question:
Do the Royal Navy developed or developing anything resembling a Short Ranged Ballistic missile in the 1950's? Something along the lines of the PGM-11 Redstone?
Blue Streak was the UK's first ballistic missile [ignoring Black Knight].
 
Problem is, it is an IRBM not SRBM
Though Redstone too was long (21meters) Blue Streak was longer with 24meters, but this Black Knight with it's 11,6meters is quite good for a shipborn weapon much closer to the size of the Polaris A1.

Hmm.. 6 missiles on 3 types of hulls (173, 190 209 meters) or 4 missiles on 167 meters each with it's own launcher. Horizontally stored, even the longer Blue Streak could be accommodated on these hulls, say 30m for each missile storage and launcher, 3 per side seems quite reasonable for these hulls
 
Last edited:
Believe it or not, there was a proposal at one time (which was fairly rapidly dropped) to base Blue Streak on barges which could be taken out to sea.
It would have been difficult to build a launcher on the seabed, since the Blue Streak proposed silo would have been about 40 m deep, and I doubt if there are any places in UK coastal waters of that depth.

Black Knight was not intended as a weapon, but solely as a research vehicle. However, it could have been converted to military use if need be. It would have the advantage that it could use storable propellants. The early version was 36 inches in diameter; a proposed follow-on design would have been 54 inches in diameter, which is exactly the same diameter as the Polaris missile.
 
And the first drawing which I could used a sketch drawing as a basis for, the GW14:
ddtrr19-25207fe1-f5f2-4ff9-a691-d48c3f81df2e.png


The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 158.5m (wl) x 21,34 x 5,41m
Displacement: 10.306tons (full load)
Engines: 30.000shp, Steam Turbines (Probably English Electric Y100), 2 shafts
Range: Unknown probably 15-21.900km at 22km/h (8-12.900nm at 12knots)
Speed: 43km/h (24knots)
Armour: 51mm Deck over Machinery and 38mm over Magazines, 51mm Belt over Machinery and Magazines (Missile and Guns)
Armaments:
2x2 3"/70 (76mm/70) QF Mk N1 AA Guns,
4x2 40mm/70 OQF Mk XI AA Guns,
1x2 GWS.1 Sea Slug SAM
Sensors:
2x Type 901 Missile Control/Director Radar
6x Type 903 Fire-control Radar, one for each MRS.3 director
1x Type 960 Air Search Radar
1x Type 974 Surface Search/Navigation Radar
1x Type 982 Air Search Radar
1x Type 983 Height Finder Radar
1x Type 992 Target indication/Surface/Air Search Radar
 
ANd the last one for the time being, the Type 984 equipped GW14A proposal:
ddtv9e2-66b9c905-354f-4cba-a0d5-3c0c2687d409.png


The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 158.5m (wl) x 21,34 x 5,41m
Displacement: 10.376tons (full load)
Engines: 30.000shp, Steam Turbines (Probably English Electric Y100), 2 shafts
Range: Unknown probably 15-21.900km at 22km/h (8-12.900nm at 12knots)
Speed: 43km/h (24knots)
Armour: 51mm Deck over Machinery and 38mm over Magazines, 51mm Belt over Machinery and Magazines (Missile and Guns)
Armaments:
2x2 3"/70 (76mm/70) QF Mk N1 AA Guns,
4x2 40mm/70 OQF Mk XI AA Guns,
1x2 GWS.1 Sea Slug SAM
Sensors:
2x Type 901 Missile Control/Director Radar
6x Type 903 Fire-control Radar, one for each MRS.3 director
1x Type 974 Surface Search/Navigation Radar
1x Type 984 3D Air Search/Fighter Control Radar
1x Type 992 Target indication/Surface/Air Search Radar
 
Some new ones:
Design GW15 a reduced sized and armament version most likely to cut the costs of the proposal:
takacs-zoltan-tzoli-gw15.jpg



The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 150.87m (wl) x 21,33 x 5,41m
Displacement: 9.508tons (full load)
Engines: 30.000shp, Steam Turbines (Probably English Electric Y100), 2 shafts
Range: Unknown probably 15-21.900km at 22km/h (8-12.900nm at 12knots)
Speed: 43km/h (24knots)
Armour: 51mm Deck over Machinery and 38mm over Magazines, 51mm Belt over Machinery and Magazines (Missile and Guns)
Armaments:
4x2 40mm/70 OQF Mk XI AA Guns,
1x2 GWS.1 Sea Slug SAM

Sensors:
2x Type 901 Missile Control/Director Radar
4x Type 903 Fire-control Radar, one for each MRS.3 director
1x Type 960 Air Search Radar
1x Type 974 Surface Search/Navigation Radar
1x Type 982 Air Search Radar
1x Type 983 Height Finder Radar
1x Type 992 Target indication/Surface/Air Search Radar
 
3.550tons, GW-24
110 x 13 x 3,8 meters
3x twin Bofors,
1x Twin Sea Slug with only 12 missiles

Minimal radar set:
1x Type 901 Missile Control/Director Radar
3x Type 903 Fire-control Radar, one for each MRS.3 director
1x Type 960 Air Search Radar
1x Type 974 Surface Search/Navigation Radar
1x Type 992 Target indication/Surface/Air Search Radar

Basically a minimal missile frigate.
 
Basically a minimal missile frigate.

Thank you!

P.S. Another question, if I may - I heard that there were some ideas about installing Sea Slug on converted merchant ships (I suppose it was pretty early in development). Was there anything supporting it, or just rumor?
 
I've not heard merchant ship conversions but I will look into my sources.
There were WW2 cruiser and carrier conversions as well new design coastal, convoy and fleet escort with these alst three having triple launchers as on Girlde Ness.
 
Next, GW16 a modified version of 15 where the 3" guns retained but missile sotwage reduced accordingly (60 instead of 90 missiles)
takacs-zoltan-tzoli-gw16.jpg


The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 153.92m (wl) x 21,33 x 5,41m
Displacement: 9.825tons (full load)
Engines: 30.000shp, Steam Turbines (Probably English Electric Y100), 2 shafts
Range: Unknown probably 15-21.900km at 22km/h (8-12.900nm at 12knots)
Speed: 43km/h (24knots)
Armour: 51mm Deck over Machinery and 38mm over Magazines, 51mm Belt over Machinery and Magazines (Missile and Guns)
Armaments:
2x2 3"/70 (76mm/70) QF Mk N1 AA Guns,
4x2 40mm/70 OQF Mk XI AA Guns,
1x2 GWS.1 Sea Slug SAM

Sensors:
2x Type 901 Missile Control/Director Radar
6x Type 903 Fire-control Radar, one for each MRS.3 director
1x Type 960 Air Search Radar
1x Type 974 Surface Search/Navigation Radar
1x Type 982 Air Search Radar
1x Type 983 Height Finder Radar
1x Type 992 Target indication/Surface/Air Search Radar
 
Following the last for the time being of the large convoy escort designs: GW17:
takacs-zoltan-tzoli-gw17.jpg



The design had the following characteristics:
Dimensions: 146.3m (wl) x 21,33 x 5,41m
Displacement: 9.180tons (full load)
Engines: 30.000shp, Steam Turbines (Probably English Electric Y100), 2 shafts
Range: Unknown probably 15-21.900km at 22km/h (8-12.900nm at 12knots)
Speed: 43km/h (24knots)
Armour: 51mm Deck over Machinery and 38mm over Magazines, 51mm Belt over Machinery and Magazines (Missile and Guns)
Armaments:
4x2 40mm/70 OQF Mk XI AA Guns,
1x2 GWS.1 Sea Slug SAM

Sensors:
2x Type 901 Missile Control/Director Radar
4x Type 903 Fire-control Radar, one for each MRS.3 director
1x Type 960 Air Search Radar
1x Type 974 Surface Search/Navigation Radar
1x Type 982 Air Search Radar
1x Type 983 Height Finder Radar
1x Type 992 Target indication/Surface/Air Search Radar
 
Last edited:
I could had done better if I had access to the original sketches but in the current situation even those who live in the UK would had difficulties reaching the archives, not alone a Hungarian artist like myself... :)
 
I could had done better if I had access to the original sketches but in the current situation even those who live in the UK would had difficulties reaching the archives, not alone a Hungarian artist like myself... :)

well you have done a great job with what information is out there.

Do not know if this is a little bit of topic, but i was wondering if the Tiger class could also be used as a missile cruiser.
 
To my knowledge the Tiger class was not considered for GW conversion, the Fiji Class was considered to be equipped with Sea Slug, as well as an Implacable class carrier and maybe the Vanguard and KGV but I'm these last two might be only risen as ideas and cost calculations
 
In the table I've posted here:

For the GW.18-23 series which were rather small proposals except for the last two, 22 and 23, the missile stowage was stated as "T". Now we know H means "Hanger" and D means "Deep" stowage, but what could T means? These designs again except from 22 and 23 had rather low missile numbers (relative to the previous proposals) so this has to mean something!
Maybe Tilted, Tram, Tank?
 
In the table I've posted here:

For the GW.18-23 series which were rather small proposals except for the last two, 22 and 23, the missile stowage was stated as "T". Now we know H means "Hanger" and D means "Deep" stowage, but what could T means? These designs again except from 22 and 23 had rather low missile numbers (relative to the previous proposals) so this has to mean something!
Maybe Tilted, Tram, Tank?
Tube?
After all, that's the term used later on.
 
I've decided to post the photos my friend made some years ago about the GW series of missile warships documents, it's not all the documts from the archives just the few my friend made. The most interesting is the complete table showing all the designs from GW.1 to GW.80
You guys can find it here:


Also who knows which radar or director is this drawing showing:
http://www.and-kin2008.narod.ru/pr61/5.JPG
What is the correct name of the source where this interesting file was found?
 
Royal Brass Foundry archives, Kew, Richmond
Workbook papers.
 
Royal Brass Foundry archives, Kew, Richmond
Workbook papers.
.

A bit confusing.

The Brass Foundry is part of the National Maritime Museum and is at Woolwich (arsenal). It holds the NMM's collection of Ships' Plans and photographs. Also Ships Covers, and Constructors Workbooks.

At Kew, in Richmond, is the TNA:pRO (The National Archives, ex-Public Records Office) which holds the vast majority of Admiralty files available to the public.

.
 
I don't know. All I know these are official documents from the Royal Archives. Some says Kew some says Brass Foundry. Sorry I'm not a British person to exactly know which is the correct archive. It is very difficult to search or more like ask for material when a country stores these in multiple locations.
 
The first lesson you should learn when encountering British civil service is that what is easy is made hard, what is hard is made impossible and what is logical is made total nonsense!!!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom