Gerald R. Ford Class CVN

Archibald

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
7,313
Reaction score
6,305
Seriously, that guy needs a big pair of spectacles. Missing such a huge target by so little ! And with such a large explosion...

Imagine, if they actually HIT the carrier and blew it up... the maniacs !
 

Archibald

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
7,313
Reaction score
6,305
That whale had serious intestinal problems... awesome video, really. Damn, 40 000 pounds of high explosives ! Is there any relation whatsoever with the largest Soviet / Russian antiship missiles ? or with the "mother of all bombs" in Russia and America ?
 

SSgtC

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jul 13, 2020
Messages
762
Reaction score
1,311
That whale had serious intestinal problems... awesome video, really. Damn, 40 000 pounds of high explosives ! Is there any relation whatsoever with the largest Soviet / Russian antiship missiles ? or with the "mother of all bombs" in Russia and America ?
It's nearly double the total weight of the MOAB (21,600 pounds) and more than double the explosive weight of the MOAB (40,000 pounds vs "only" 18,700). If my math is right, and I'm dealing with a head cold so it may not be, the explosion at of by the USN is only something like .02 kilotons. So far larger than the biggest conventional weapons, and far smaller than all but a handful of nukes (the SADM is about the only I could think of smaller with a yield of about .01KT).
 

Josh_TN

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
799
I think shock testing uses such huge amounts to duplicate a much smaller, more local explosion (a torpedo or mine). In order to duplicate the shockwave of such an event without actually penetrating the hull, very large explosions much further away are used.
 

Josh_TN

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
799
I have to admit, when I first learned about shock testing, I was kinda like 'you got to be shitting me', especially the fact sailors are actually based on board the target ship.

Do other navies go through this process? I tried searching for any relevant tests and documents a few times and have never turned anything up, but I assume this isn't strictly a USN practice?
 

Moose

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
1,564
Reaction score
693
I have to admit, when I first learned about shock testing, I was kinda like 'you got to be shitting me', especially the fact sailors are actually based on board the target ship.

Do other navies go through this process? I tried searching for any relevant tests and documents a few times and have never turned anything up, but I assume this isn't strictly a USN practice?
There's actually a NATO standard for shock testing, STANAG 4137. The Danes were quite chuffed when their frigates, which use a lot of commercial design and build elements, aced their 4137 rating.

The CVN shock trial program is usually quite a bit more rigorous than the standard.
 

aonestudio

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
667
Reaction score
1,356

aonestudio

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
667
Reaction score
1,356

aonestudio

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
667
Reaction score
1,356

aonestudio

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
667
Reaction score
1,356

SSgtC

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jul 13, 2020
Messages
762
Reaction score
1,311
Meh. Pretty normal, all things considered. It sounds like a bigger issue then what it really is
 

helmutkohl

ACCESS: Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
945
Reaction score
1,640
damn, as politicians Ford already took parts from Kennedy and now as carriers, Ford is still taking parts from Kennedy :p
 

Similar threads

Top