The real pity, rereading this post now, is that the Spangenberg site is no longer functional. I don't like piracy per se, but this is one of those times I hope someone kept a digital resource of the whole thing that they could repost.
Fortunately, this very site has it covered:

The PDFs aren't quite as convenient to navigate as the website, but it's all there.
Bless!
 
CVA01 was designed to operate large heavy VG aircraft and the designers must have been aware of the F111B.
For modellers the addition of F111B to a CVA01 airgroup is attractive.
 

Attachments

  • 96197-1f3604793e8cd5fb0587f072ef08cf07~2.jpg
    96197-1f3604793e8cd5fb0587f072ef08cf07~2.jpg
    36.8 KB · Views: 201
Given the sheer size of the F-111B, it's interesting they used Coral Sea and not something larger in the Forrestal class. I wonder why that may have been?
I believe it was during a work-up period before their 9/7/68 - 4/18/69 WestPac/Vietnam deployment.

I think the insinuation is that the Navy chose an unsuitable ship for the trials, as they wanted the trials to fail, because they did not want the F-111B . . .

cheers,
Robin.
 
CVA01 was designed to operate large heavy VG aircraft and the designers must have been aware of the F111B.
For modellers the addition of F111B to a CVA01 airgroup is attractive.
For pure fiction see here:

I have just finished this and made a copy for my private use. I have no had so much Oz fun since Prisoner Cell Block H hooked my late parents years ago. As for the artwork do you remember Jenny Agutter in WALKABOUT.
 
F-111B components.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (6656).png
    Screenshot (6656).png
    720.3 KB · Views: 148
I have just finished this and made a copy for my private use. I have no had so much Oz fun since Prisoner Cell Block H hooked my late parents years ago. As for the artwork do you remember Jenny Agutter in WALKABOUT.
My only issue is.... just how many service psychiatrists would be required in the OCD Force? :)
 
From testimony to the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations, March 1970, a detailed list of changes proposed as part of the CWIP-III study and the performance that was expected from that configuration. Also included is a memorandum with brief descriptions of other configurations designated A, C, E, X and Y.
 

Attachments

  • F-111B Studies 7of8.png
    F-111B Studies 7of8.png
    285.7 KB · Views: 42
  • F-111B Studies 6of8.png
    F-111B Studies 6of8.png
    292.3 KB · Views: 34
  • F-111B Studies 5of8.png
    F-111B Studies 5of8.png
    261.2 KB · Views: 29
  • F-111B Studies 4of8.png
    F-111B Studies 4of8.png
    187.3 KB · Views: 30
  • F-111B Studies 3of8.png
    F-111B Studies 3of8.png
    233.7 KB · Views: 29
  • F-111B Studies 2of8.png
    F-111B Studies 2of8.png
    252 KB · Views: 29
  • F-111B Studies 1of8.png
    F-111B Studies 1of8.png
    258.2 KB · Views: 31
  • F-111B Studies 8of8.png
    F-111B Studies 8of8.png
    190 KB · Views: 34
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom