That plan makes way more sense than the next dozen WW2 long-range bomber plans.…..
The return trip was planned to bomb the Soviet Union in some cases and return to in series.
…
Except for the obvious problem that hitting specific bridges from high altitude with a strategic bomber ain't that easy. Taking out bridges was more often accomplished with tactical aircraft, and even then it wasn't a given that it would be successful.That plan makes way more sense than the next dozen WW2 long-range bomber plans.
Consider that - to this day - the Russian Army heavily depends upon railroads, so all that Japan needed to do was wreck a dozen rail bridges to prevent a Russian invasion of the Japanese Home Islands.
Unfortunately Japanese military collectors are known to hoard photographs and documents, and never share themThis is a completely worthless post....
A few months ago, I contacted someone who had original documents on Fugaku (or more precisely, the six-engine aircraft planned for Nakajima) and was able to show it to me.
But he doesn't want it to be filmed or posted online.
But there were certainly drawings, texts, and graphs about the six-engine aircraft.
And I know another person who has original documents on Fugaku.
I believe that documents these two people have are all of the existing documents directly related to Fugaku.
If my memory was better, I might have been able to pick out some excerpts from what I saw, but I've forgotten most of them now...
Well, it is not good thing.Unfortunately Japanese military collectors are known to hoard photographs and couments, and never share them
What did you see exactly? Anything new that differs from here?Well, it is not good thing.
I tried to negotiate with him, but to no avail.
But, I plan to go see it again, so if I have any interesting information I might post it here.
Absolutely yes.What did you see exactly? Anything new that differs from here?
I don't understand why nr 3 and 4 engines have simple propellers on this model ... Is it the same thing on the real project ? (If a real project did exist ...)Hi! Transport variant model.
![]()
å¹»ã®è¼¸éæ©ãå¯å¶½ã15åã®1ã¢ãã«ã11æã太ç°ãRCèªç©ºãã¼ã¸ã§ã³ããã§é£è¡ï¼æ±äº¬æ°èãã¸ã¿ã«
群馬ç太ç°å¸ã«ãã£ãä¸å³¶é£è¡æ©ï¼ç¾SUBARUï¼ãæ¦æä¸ã«è¨ç»ããä½ç¿¼6çºè¼¸éæ©ãå¯å¶½ï¼ãµãã/rt>ï¼ãã®15åã®1ã¹ã±ã¼ã«ã¢ãã«ã...www.tokyo-np.co.jp
B-36 is faster, but this huge boy is impressive anyway.Japan B-36![]()
Hello, do you know where I can watch Goodbye Air battle warship Fugaku?I watched Japanese TV drama "さらば 空中戦艦 富嶽 (Good-bye Air battle warship Fugaku)" which described Fugaku project from the beginning untill the end. In the drama, I watched strange blue print which shows the aircraft shape we used to discuss.
I can see some Nakajima's official blue prints in the drama. They were Z-Koizumu, Z-Ohta, Z-final and HA-54 engine.
I can see the cover of Chikuhei Nakajima's "試製富嶽日記 (Experimental Fugaku diary)"
Also I can see real interview to Yasuo Naito(Wing aero dynamic desingner), Kiyoshi Tanaka(HA-54 desinger), etc.
It seems that the information from the actual Fugaku project persons concerned was also reflected in this drama.
Anything new In regards to your research?Absolutely yes.
As for the drawings, there may not be many new ones.
However, new texts and etc there are many.
Regarding Fugaku, I will refrain from posting to this thread until I look at the documents again.
My unclear story will only confuse many people.