Awesome idea! It basically done the same "catching" job as SpaceX Mechazilla "chopsticks", but Chinese concept is simpler and more elegant. Instead of heavy manipulators moving with high precision to catch the rocket, they use cables stretched between trolleys; the control is simplified (each trolley could only move along guiding rail), and the precision requirements are far less strict. All the rocket need to do, is to get within the square, and trolleys would move to catch it no matter where inside the square it would be descending.Long March-10B landing explained:
Those attachement points seems to be integrated into the same frame as control rudders, and this part of the rocket obviously made strong enough (otherwise the rudders would risk to fell away). I rather doubt that cable catchers create more strain on barely moving rocket's structure than rudders during supersonic descent.Behind those cable attachement points there has to be inside the rocket some serious structuel reinforcements.
Not that it weigh so much as 4 landing legs, but not all of this landing method is profit.
1st stage Trajectory:T-9s, ignition
T0, 26/07/10-12:15:50.529, liftoff
T+18s, pitch-over maneuver
~T+85s, Max-Q (maximum dynamic pressure)
T+154.7525s (video shows 154–156s), first-stage engine cutoff, V=1.77 km/s, H=61 km
T+159.7992s, stage separation
T+168.9620s, second-stage ignition
T+(170s), second-stage engine at full thrust
T+212.7199s, fairing jettison
T+252.8268s (253–255s), first-stage grid fin deployment
~T+260s, first stage reaches apogee, V=1.48 km/s, H=110 km
T+365.0524s (367s), first-stage powered deceleration burn (two engines), V=1.78 km/s, H=59 km
T+393.0325s, first-stage powered deceleration burn cutoff (two engines), V=1.26 km/s, H=35 km
T+446.9724s (450s), first-stage landing burn (three engines) , V=0.29 km/s, H=1.5 km
T+457.5525 s (458 s), first-stage fixed engines cutoff
T+477.3347 s (473–475 s), first-stage cable deployment
T+483 s, first-stage center engine cutoff; net-capture recovery; landing point 439 km from launch site; coordinates approx. 16°29.9' N, 113°31.7' E
T+525.8325 s, second-stage first cutoff
T+1767.2524 s, propellant settling prior to second-stage second ignition
T+2922.2200 s, second-stage second ignition
T+2927.6123 s, second-stage second cutoff
T+2932.6125 s, terminal velocity correction cutoff
T+3094.9912 s, spacecraft-rocket separation
Open-source the technical data of CZ10B to domestic manufacturers.The "Notice on Issuing the Guidelines for Reusable Launch Vehicle Research Projects (Third Batch)" has been officially released. Various enterprises and institutions can consult the declaration requirements and guidelines through the appropriate channels and are encouraged to submit their applications actively.
Any clue as to dimensions? Or where it's home-ported?So that's how big it is.
‘Linghangzhe' the booster recovery ship is 144m long, 50m, and has a maximum full load displacement of 25,000 tons. The height of the catch tower is around 67m with a structural weight of around 3,500 tons. It's home port is Sanya Nanshan Port.Any clue as to dimensions? Or where it's home-ported?
Long march 3B successfuly returns to flight 5 months after its failure, launching the Shijian 31 satellite to a mid-inclination Medium Earth orbit, similar launch trajectories on CZ-3B have recently been used to launch Early warning TJS satellites, built by SAST like Shijian-31, in Molniya orbit , although the use may be different given the different name, Shijian 31 is officially used for "space environment exploration". The cause of the failure on the previous flight was not disclosed.
View attachment 815540
Doesn't really compare them though. How does it stack up size-wise?New image of assembly building for Long March 9
in comperasion to VAB and Gigabay
NASA VAB:Doesn't really compare them though. How does it stack up size-wise?
Now, Landspace is poised for a second attempt at liftoff and landing, with airspace closure notices indicating that launch is scheduled from the Dongfeng commercial space innovation pilot zone at Jiuquan spaceport, in northwest China, at around 7:45 p.m. EDT on Aug. 10 (23:45 GMT, or 7:45 a.m. Beijing time, Aug. 11).
"Monday night closes with the second flight of LandSpace’s ZhuQue-3 (ZQ-3), China’s first privately developed reusable orbital rocket, lifting off from Launch Area 96B at Jiuquan with an undisclosed payload at 23:37 UTC. The 66-meter, stainless steel, methane-fueled vehicle was built from the start for recovery, with a nine-engine first stage designed to return to a downrange landing pad. This is the 191st orbital launch attempt of 2026 and LandSpace’s second recovery attempt."Zhuque 3 Y2
The state-owned China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) launched a Long March 7A rocket today (Aug. 10) from the Wenchang Space Launch Site, in the country's Hainan province, just after 8:00 a.m. EDT (1200 GMT; 8:02 p.m. local time). Around 85 seconds into the launch, the rocket exploded, generating a massive fireball and a cloud of smoke and debris while still soaring through Earth's atmosphere.
CASC had not yet released a statement about the incident by the time of this story's publication, but video reposted to social media captured the shock of onlookers the moment that the rocket burst into flames. Based on such views, the mission will almost certainly be deemed a complete failure, with total loss of vehicle and payload.
Yeah it does appear to be weather delayed.ZQ-3 Y2 launch *might* be delayed due to bad weather at launch and land site. Nothing fixed yet though.