- Joined
- 27 December 2005
- Messages
- 19,230
- Reaction score
- 35,694
https://www.navair.navy.mil/foia/si...sider's View of the Phoenix 2021-010204_0.pdf
Some great information here.
Plus, Argon-15 matters too. According to 'Авиация ПВО России и научно-технический прогресс' written by Academica E.A.Fedosov, Zaslon implemented Wald Test (some kind of likelihood estimation?) in target detection, which is classified as 'advance' in the well-known 'Introduction'. This means, with same returning power, it could decide is it target or not way better than the traditional single threshold method.Range is different from range. That's why I tried to specify details for those numbers. As for what tech should've given it better detection range? It's ESA, thus have quite a bit narrower beams giving it better power to return ratio. It has quite healthy dig processing (despite your bashing of Argon-15A which I tbh not totally understand). It IS quite powerful (don't have specific tube info, but N011M have 8kw tube with ~5kw peak while having 1.2kw average, so it's not just ×2). BTW on N011 example - M has better range chars despite having less peak power than slotted 011. ESA matters.
Human-step-in literally means guess-it-or-not, most unreliable.Anyone know how accurate is this tibit ?
Hmmm... Isn't 200km was instrumental range for whole AWG-9?