• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

AST 1227: BAe Sabre ASM

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,878
Reaction score
4,828
AST (Air Staff Target) 1227 was a requirement for a PGM for antitank duties. BAe offered the highly supersonic Sabre, based on the Rapier SAM airframe with a laser seeker. Bill Gunston suggests the seeker was by Martin Marietta and related to the Copperhead seeker. Single shot kill probability (SSKP) of 80% was calculated for a typical tank.

Sources
  • Bill Gunston, Illustrated Encyclopaedia of the Worlds Rockets & Missiles Salamander 1979, p117
 

Attachments

  • sabre.jpg
    sabre.jpg
    28.9 KB · Views: 1,065

TinWing

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
893
Reaction score
77
overscan said:
AST (Air Staff Target) 1227 was a requirement for a PGM for antitank duties. BAe offered the highly supersonic Sabre, based on the Rapier SAM airframe with a laser seeker. Bill Gunston suggests the seeker was by Martin Marietta and related to the Copperhead seeker. Single shot kill probability (SSKP) of 80% was calculated for a typical tank.

Sources
  • Bill Gunston, Illustrated Encyclopaedia of the Worlds Rockets & Missiles Salamander 1979, p117

The French proposed a similar laser guided ASM based on the Roland SAM. The AS.2L (or AS.LL) was apparently dead by 1982.

Source
  • Bill Gunston, An Illustrated Guide To Modern Airborne Missiles Salamander 1983, p80
 

batigol

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
47
Reaction score
37
Image from Flight Intl, May 1978. Any ideas as to what the dimensions were?
 

Attachments

  • BAE SABRE.jpg
    BAE SABRE.jpg
    52.1 KB · Views: 793

CJGibson

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
1,521
Reaction score
840
From BSP4

L= 7.7ft (2.3m) Diamter 5.25in (13.3cm) span across fins 15in (38cm)

Laser seeker was superseded by MMW technology.

Chris
 

pathology_doc

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 7, 2008
Messages
1,001
Reaction score
263
It's almost asking for a fair-to-middling-weather SAM application, isn't it? Perhaps not that good against fast jets, but death to slower COIN aircraft and helicopters. Semi-active laser homing, with no guidance data-link to jam and potentially easier steering of a much tighter beam.
 

pathology_doc

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 7, 2008
Messages
1,001
Reaction score
263
I can do no more than to echo what Robunos said over on the AGM-64 thread:


http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,21832.0.html


When you've found an aerodynamic planform on which you have expended much slide-rule (or computer) and wind-tunnel time, and you find it works, you're going to tend to re-use that planform an awful lot. It cuts down on the work you have to do, since any changes are limited to recalculating centres of gravity versus pressure (based on what you're stuffing inside and where in the missile it's going) to determine the dynamics, and perhaps scaling up or down a little. If you don't stray too far from the original dimensions and you can keep the weight distribution roughly the same, you may not even have to recalculate things like missile body bending moments, the required thickness of the outer skin, etc. etc. And first-approximation calculations of the new missile's aerodynamic performance (upon which, I am guessing, sales brochures are based) can be done very quickly.
 

Similar threads

Top