• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Armstrong Whitworth AW.167 Transport Airliner Project

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,227
Reaction score
544
Another photo of the A.W.167 in model form gives a better idea of the annular intake around the fuselage, ahead of the tail:
 

Attachments

  • A.W.167 (Air Pictorial, October 1955).jpg
    A.W.167 (Air Pictorial, October 1955).jpg
    140 KB · Views: 647

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,362
Reaction score
4,162
Thank you Victor,and by that time,I couldn't imagine the locations of engines.
 

redstar72

Soviet Aviation enthusiast
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
519
Reaction score
55
Are any technical data of the AW.167 project known?

It seems logical enough that Kurt Tank chose such an exotic layout for his IAe.36 in 1950, when the only engines available for him were the Nenes, not powerful enough but with large diameter... But why A.W. chose it five years later, with Sapphire engines? Does anybody know their reasons?
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,362
Reaction score
4,162
Good question my dear Redstar,

you are right,no logical reason for that.

https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1955/1955%20-%201322.html
 

Attachments

  • A.png
    A.png
    194.5 KB · Views: 219

redstar72

Soviet Aviation enthusiast
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
519
Reaction score
55
hesham said:
Good question my dear Redstar,

you are right,no logical reason for that.

https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1955/1955%20-%201322.html

Thanks Hesham! Not so much, but better than nothing ;). At least passenger capacity is known.
 

Zoo Tycoon

ACCESS: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
477
Reaction score
556
The former head of AW project office and thier chief engineer, Dr Alan Troughton contributed to article on the AW681 not so long ago. Indeed I'm sure I've read this configuration is credited to him. I guess he would be very old now but just maybe.
 

Hood

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
2,067
Reaction score
1,583
The layout chosen was probably the most aerodynamic way to get five jet engines on the airframe without using a mix of podded and tail engines. Remember during that time British designers were wary of underwing nacelles and preferred buried engines for reduced drag (at the cost of easy access at some times). The AW.167 would have had much better access to the engines though than wingroot engines.
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,362
Reaction score
4,162
My dear Redstar,

here is a more Info.
 

Attachments

  • a.png
    a.png
    95.1 KB · Views: 144

redstar72

Soviet Aviation enthusiast
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
519
Reaction score
55
Many thanks Hesham! Can I ask you about the source?
 

Wyvern

ACCESS: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
475
Reaction score
458
It sort of reminds me of the Argentinian FMA I.A. 36 Condor airliner project.
 

Similar threads

Top