You are probably correct. But Thailand does have a talent for maintaining small fleets of interesting aircraft long past their sell by day.A singular tanker? Two is one and one is none.
It'll be grounded and up for sale in a decade.
You are probably correct. But Thailand does have a talent for maintaining small fleets of interesting aircraft long past their sell by day.A singular tanker? Two is one and one is none.
It'll be grounded and up for sale in a decade.
www.opex360.com
DoneMods - Could we change the thread title from 'RAF A330 MRTT Voyager' to 'Airbus A330 MRTT' please...there isn't a main post for A330 MRTT so a lot of general content has ended up here (and I'm as guilty as most...).
For Italy --> OPERATIONAL AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR “Multi-Role Heavy Tanker Aircraft”
Edit, note the delivery timeframe
3. Key Performance Parameters (KPPs)3.1. Fleet consistency and deliveryThe fleet SHALL consist of a total of 6 aircraft by the year 2030.The entire fleet SHALL reach completion by the end of 2030.In order to permit a timely acquisition, it is acceptable that the 6 aircraft could be pre-owned military tanker or civilian derived aircraft (airliner) to be tanker modified, keeping compliance with the requirement of 30 years of life cycle (as mentioned in requirement 129.).- Threshold: at least 2 aircraft delivered by the year 2029 and the remaining by the year 2030;- Objective: 2 aircraft delivered by 2028, 2 in 2029, 2 in 2030.Such delivery plan implies the Contractor's ability to deliver the first aircraft in less than three years from the operating date of the acquisition contract, and therefore, in relation to the fact that the development of a new dedicated system design usually involves much longer timelines, it is essential to maintain low programmatic risk through the acquisition of already developed and already operative available robust technical solutions as opposed to substantial development or modification projects.For all the above, the Tanker SHALL have been employed in AAR operations for at least 2 years.
According to the author, Germany ( alone / without the MFF ? ) could be one of these customers.
Well, the main concern is with runway length and aprons surface. What kind of cities European are going to fight for? Would WWIII be reduced to the siege of Charles de Gaulle airport and equivalent?
Yes to transcontinental refueling capacities but what does the MRTT stands for when it come to defend remote corners of Europe where there isn´t enough airport with compatible runway length? Are we just signing a blank check to the Russians and else, just days after we guaranteed their financial bonds and stocks?
(oh, maybe I should have done better translating those latte lines in Russian to make an impact)
European Union
total: 1,882over 3,047 m: 1202,438 to 3,047 m: 3411,524 to 2,437 m: 507914 to 1,523 m: 425under 914 m: 489 (2017)
You don't base the tanker force on the front line, or even the front line country.Well, the main concern is with runway length and aprons surface. What kind of cities European are going to fight for? Would WWIII be reduced to the siege of Charles de Gaulle airport and equivalent?
Yes to transcontinental refueling capacities but what does the MRTT stands for when it come to defend remote corners of Europe where there isn´t enough airport with compatible runway length?
Any runway over 3000m/10,000ft is intended for heavy aircraft like 747s.Rwy length is not an indication of runway class (that include width information) and apron surface.
An interesting aspect is the engine requirement which is for CEAP/11.For Italy --> OPERATIONAL AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR “Multi-Role Heavy Tanker Aircraft”
That would seem to invalidate the KC-46 OOTB as the PW4062 is not at CAEP/11.The Aircraft SHALL be equipped with a 2 engines turbofan propulsion system. Emissions SHALL be compliant with CAEP/11 (Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection/11) requirements.
The Ministry of Defence is reportedly in negotiations with Airbus Defence & Space for the acquisition of additional A330 MRTTs to strengthen the capabilities of the Air Force and the Space Corps, which already exploits them within its 45th squadron, and thus improve the resources of the armed forces in the service of the State. The Iran-Contra case has once again highlighted the importance of these aircraft which, in addition to their capacity to transport troops and equipment, allow in-flight refuelling.