archipeppe

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
18 October 2007
Messages
2,556
Reaction score
3,892
Here is my personal contribution about this interesting, even if unrealized, project of mid-'80s.
It was essentially a Soyuz replacement with an enlarged reentry module (reusable through the exploitation of VKK Buran's TPS) and a small expendeable service module.
 

Attachments

  • Slide1.JPG
    Slide1.JPG
    15.5 KB · Views: 633
  • Slide7.JPG
    Slide7.JPG
    41.1 KB · Views: 315
  • Slide6.JPG
    Slide6.JPG
    26.5 KB · Views: 298
  • Slide5.JPG
    Slide5.JPG
    32.1 KB · Views: 630
  • Slide4.JPG
    Slide4.JPG
    32.5 KB · Views: 684
  • Slide3.JPG
    Slide3.JPG
    44.9 KB · Views: 676
  • Slide2.JPG
    Slide2.JPG
    40.8 KB · Views: 738
Many thanks folks!!!

I'm glad that you're appreciated my work....
 
good stuff, who needs Ares, ;D,
can i ask, do you have any more drawings of launch vehicles, like in slide2?,

cheers,
Robin.
 
robunos said:
good stuff, who needs Ares, ;D,

The idea has plenty of concepts that Ares & Orion might be wise to borrow. When it was announced that Orion would be reusable, I thought about a lot of the reusability features on Zarya (braking rockets around the circumference of the spacecraft, ceramic tile TPS, etc.) But now it looks like Orion is going to splash down, and the pressure shells will be expendable.
 
Can it be that Zarya is based on much older design ?

According Anatoly Zak, in 1973 the L3M had enlarge Soyuz capsule of 3.7 meter diameter.
that would be same size of Zarya
that enlarge Soyuz capsule give place for 3 man for 14 to 30 days mission time.

source
Anatoly Zak
Russian in space
page 267
 
Michel Van said:
Can it be that Zarya is based on much older design ?

According Anatoly Zak, in 1973 the L3M had enlarge Soyuz capsule of 3.7 meter diameter.
that would be same size of Zarya
that enlarge Soyuz capsule give place for 3 man for 14 to 30 days mission time.

source
Anatoly Zak
Russian in space
page 267


If I remember well the L3M was conceived in the wake of the Soviet Lunar Project....
 
The Zenit/Energiya strap-ons were to replace R-7 and UR-500 at some point?
 
The Zenit/Energiya strap-ons were to replace R-7 and UR-500 at some point?
So far i know, yes
Energya system was modular to bring 14 to 200 tons in low orbit or 55 tons to Mars or Moon
it's booster could use als Zenit rocket
Guess Zenit second stage could be use on Energya launcher bring payload in orbit.
and with Hydrolox stage it reach moon mars
that stage with 2-4 booster bring medium payload.

isad that Energya was abandon after collapsing of USSR.
it was such unique launch system
 
Three more Zarya info posters. The tps diagram is a slightly different configuration to what's shown on an almost identical diagram; implying that that was the test configuration with ejection seats, while the one attached below is the fully operational variant. The first graphic includes what looks to be a Zarya configuration air-launched from an An-225.
 

Attachments

  • 1757857957958.png
    1757857957958.png
    2.5 MB · Views: 119
  • zarya reentry diag.png
    zarya reentry diag.png
    710.7 KB · Views: 110
  • zarya thermal comp.png
    zarya thermal comp.png
    691.1 KB · Views: 112
Why, assuming it is done correctly?
i'm referring specifically to translating and *then* tallying program/spacecraft/module names, where you can run into two different words in one language "correctly" translating to the same word in the target language. i mean, it's a neat bit of trivia that the ISS has had two Quests, two Dawns and two Piers but they all have different names, really.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom