- Joined
- 24 November 2008
- Messages
- 1,549
- Reaction score
- 2,612
So, for yaw control, they channel the Delta extrados vortex asymmetrically.
Can you elaborate what you mean by that?
So, for yaw control, they channel the Delta extrados vortex asymmetrically.
I never said that it was, it's just that the overall picture is now considerably more complicated.1st, Hezbollah is a bad example. Israel never intend a full scale invasion more like bluffing.
2nd, Russia lack precision attack ability serious undermined the significance of air supremacy.
What happen when your enemy has air supremacy and good precision attack ability?
The modern war is system vs system, now with drones part the system, the cost of winning the war is much higher than before.
It doesn't mean air supremacy is obsolete.
Yes! It look like a single-seat aircraft..... and i really love this nose shape!Side-by-side seating arrangement? I'm not convinced... On this screenshot the canopy looks too narrow. Note the large lateral distance between the canopy and the edge of the nose!
View attachment 764504
I still think it's a double seater. It's hard to see but there's a shape that looks like a pilot sitting in the left seat.Side-by-side seating arrangement? I'm not convinced... On this screenshot the canopy looks too narrow. Note the large lateral distance between the canopy and the edge of the nose!
View attachment 764504
No, I'm all the more convinced that it's a side by side seater. Firstly, longitudinal frame element is pretty apparent in the video. Secondly, the reflections caused by canopy curvature in this particular angle is minimizing the apparent size of the frontal plane of the windscreen but even so it is much wider than anything you would see on a singleseater. There is no single seater that would warrant the windscreen to wide enough to even be planar in the first place.Side-by-side seating arrangement? I'm not convinced... On this screenshot the canopy looks too narrow. Note the large lateral distance between the canopy and the edge of the nose!
It appears the J-36 retracted it's gear for the first time (observed anyway) during the latest flight.
开始秀了_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
网络, 视频播放量 41776、弹幕量 24、点赞数 651、投硬币枚数 8、收藏人数 201、转发人数 80, 视频作者 Roxy的老公, 作者简介 鹰击长空,鱼翔浅底,万类霜天竞自由,相关视频:F47。这机动性你敢说是轰炸机?,今天给面子啊,刚飞的沈6姬,我嘞个去,侧面也有喷口?,今天上坟时随手拍到的飞机遛弯,请眼尖的B友们给看看是不是六代机?,J36新CG,天天这样好吗 实在憋不住了 快点公布吧,歼-36这个盘旋的含金量怎么样?,看不到空速管儿的北六,在学校看见了六代机,第二款六代机,石榴姐伴飞www.bilibili.com
I absolutely expect a side-by-side seating arrangement, but the latest video snapshots made me reconsider my assumption. Let's see how it turns out... A few months ago no one expected three engines and a combination of caret and dorsal intakes.I still think it's a double seater. It's hard to see but there's a shape that looks like a pilot sitting in the left seat.
It's not like they have to have the ESO/WSO/drone controller sitting inside right now anyway, the plane clearly doesn't even have a radar installed yet.
I am confused, are you saying that we cannot claim the J-36 has been seen flying with its gear retracted? Because we also have that image of the fuel dumping this morning -- the very image you linked earlier -- and its fairly clear from the continuous OML that the landing gear is retracted there. Even if for some reason in this particular sequence only the nose gear has been left extended (seems incredibly unlikely to have independent controls between main and nose gear; still doesnt explain why the last frame has absolutely no indication of the hitherto conspicuous gear bay doors), it does not seem sufficient to patently disprove the assertion that the J-36 has been seen flying with its gear retracted.I don't think so
Video shows landing gear retraction.
“成飞六代机歼36”第四次试飞原声大片 自豪 震撼 感动_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
“成飞六代机歼36”第四次试飞原声大片 自豪 震撼 感动, 视频播放量 240653、弹幕量 581、点赞数 5398、投硬币枚数 279、收藏人数 1419、转发人数 445, 视频作者 團子CT, 作者简介 网抑音樂人:團子- CT 代表作【武林风】【电白霞洞】【去往哪里】【相信自己ꋍꑍꌕ】【Look DSMNTR】 国家职业资格认证健身教练,相关视频:外星人战机的近距离降落!这压迫感太震撼了!,歼-36前所未有近距离拍摄视频再次曝光,细节满满!成都人太幸福了!,台湾军事专家评论六代机首飞,真的吓了一大跳!,“歼50 第四次飞行”超清原声大片 震撼 犹如外星战舰 北六...www.bilibili.com
Timestamp? That's like a five minute video with compilations of many short clips
I may be reaching, but I wonder if the mass test flights happening right now are in response to the F-47 announcement.
Why would CAC do such a ludicrous thing in response to something that doesn't even exist yet? Unlike China, they haven't even built a production-representative prototype yet.I may be reaching, but I wonder if the mass test flights happening right now are in response to the F-47 announcement.
You do not fly test articles just for political reasons.
How else can I get people to scrutinize every second of the video?
Tell that to the CCP.
This makes sense. Thanks.Almost certainly unrelated. You do not fly test articles just for political reasons. How much you publicize those flights changes; how those are scheduled is far below the political level.
It appears the J-36 retracted it's gear for the first time (observed anyway) during the latest flight.
开始秀了_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
网络, 视频播放量 41776、弹幕量 24、点赞数 651、投硬币枚数 8、收藏人数 201、转发人数 80, 视频作者 Roxy的老公, 作者简介 鹰击长空,鱼翔浅底,万类霜天竞自由,相关视频:F47。这机动性你敢说是轰炸机?,今天给面子啊,刚飞的沈6姬,我嘞个去,侧面也有喷口?,今天上坟时随手拍到的飞机遛弯,请眼尖的B友们给看看是不是六代机?,J36新CG,天天这样好吗 实在憋不住了 快点公布吧,歼-36这个盘旋的含金量怎么样?,看不到空速管儿的北六,在学校看见了六代机,第二款六代机,石榴姐伴飞www.bilibili.com
No hud?Cool
I don't think CG art is worth scrutinizing?No hud?