- Joined
- 24 November 2008
- Messages
- 1,817
- Reaction score
- 4,171
So, for yaw control, they channel the Delta extrados vortex asymmetrically.
Can you elaborate what you mean by that?
So, for yaw control, they channel the Delta extrados vortex asymmetrically.
I never said that it was, it's just that the overall picture is now considerably more complicated.1st, Hezbollah is a bad example. Israel never intend a full scale invasion more like bluffing.
2nd, Russia lack precision attack ability serious undermined the significance of air supremacy.
What happen when your enemy has air supremacy and good precision attack ability?
The modern war is system vs system, now with drones part the system, the cost of winning the war is much higher than before.
It doesn't mean air supremacy is obsolete.
Yes! It look like a single-seat aircraft..... and i really love this nose shape!Side-by-side seating arrangement? I'm not convinced... On this screenshot the canopy looks too narrow. Note the large lateral distance between the canopy and the edge of the nose!
View attachment 764504
I still think it's a double seater. It's hard to see but there's a shape that looks like a pilot sitting in the left seat.Side-by-side seating arrangement? I'm not convinced... On this screenshot the canopy looks too narrow. Note the large lateral distance between the canopy and the edge of the nose!
View attachment 764504
No, I'm all the more convinced that it's a side by side seater. Firstly, longitudinal frame element is pretty apparent in the video. Secondly, the reflections caused by canopy curvature in this particular angle is minimizing the apparent size of the frontal plane of the windscreen but even so it is much wider than anything you would see on a singleseater. There is no single seater that would warrant the windscreen to wide enough to even be planar in the first place.Side-by-side seating arrangement? I'm not convinced... On this screenshot the canopy looks too narrow. Note the large lateral distance between the canopy and the edge of the nose!
It appears the J-36 retracted it's gear for the first time (observed anyway) during the latest flight.
开始秀了_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
网络, 视频播放量 58255、弹幕量 26、点赞数 738、投硬币枚数 8、收藏人数 224、转发人数 81, 视频作者 Roxy的老公, 作者简介 鹰击长空,鱼翔浅底,万类霜天竞自由,相关视频:世界上最大的飞机,世界上最丑的飞机。,当人类认为四发耗油量过大时……,飞的太低了,机长:不好意思,战斗机开习惯了!,F47。这机动性你敢说是轰炸机?,你以为的南航vs现实的南航,这是高手!!!,六代机试飞从大哥头顶飞过激动爆粗口,这么长时间,终于歪了一个猎鹰9www.bilibili.com
I absolutely expect a side-by-side seating arrangement, but the latest video snapshots made me reconsider my assumption. Let's see how it turns out... A few months ago no one expected three engines and a combination of caret and dorsal intakes.I still think it's a double seater. It's hard to see but there's a shape that looks like a pilot sitting in the left seat.
It's not like they have to have the ESO/WSO/drone controller sitting inside right now anyway, the plane clearly doesn't even have a radar installed yet.
I am confused, are you saying that we cannot claim the J-36 has been seen flying with its gear retracted? Because we also have that image of the fuel dumping this morning -- the very image you linked earlier -- and its fairly clear from the continuous OML that the landing gear is retracted there. Even if for some reason in this particular sequence only the nose gear has been left extended (seems incredibly unlikely to have independent controls between main and nose gear; still doesnt explain why the last frame has absolutely no indication of the hitherto conspicuous gear bay doors), it does not seem sufficient to patently disprove the assertion that the J-36 has been seen flying with its gear retracted.I don't think so
Video shows landing gear retraction.
视频去哪了呢?_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
undefined, 视频播放量 undefined、弹幕量 undefined、点赞数 undefined、投硬币枚数 undefined、收藏人数 undefined、转发人数 undefined, 视频作者 undefined, 作者简介 undefined,相关视频:www.bilibili.com
Timestamp? That's like a five minute video with compilations of many short clips
I may be reaching, but I wonder if the mass test flights happening right now are in response to the F-47 announcement.
Why would CAC do such a ludicrous thing in response to something that doesn't even exist yet? Unlike China, they haven't even built a production-representative prototype yet.I may be reaching, but I wonder if the mass test flights happening right now are in response to the F-47 announcement.
You do not fly test articles just for political reasons.
How else can I get people to scrutinize every second of the video?
Tell that to the CCP.
This makes sense. Thanks.Almost certainly unrelated. You do not fly test articles just for political reasons. How much you publicize those flights changes; how those are scheduled is far below the political level.
It appears the J-36 retracted it's gear for the first time (observed anyway) during the latest flight.
开始秀了_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
网络, 视频播放量 58255、弹幕量 26、点赞数 738、投硬币枚数 8、收藏人数 224、转发人数 81, 视频作者 Roxy的老公, 作者简介 鹰击长空,鱼翔浅底,万类霜天竞自由,相关视频:世界上最大的飞机,世界上最丑的飞机。,当人类认为四发耗油量过大时……,飞的太低了,机长:不好意思,战斗机开习惯了!,F47。这机动性你敢说是轰炸机?,你以为的南航vs现实的南航,这是高手!!!,六代机试飞从大哥头顶飞过激动爆粗口,这么长时间,终于歪了一个猎鹰9www.bilibili.com
No hud?Cool
I don't think CG art is worth scrutinizing?No hud?