• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Wackett Warrigal II fighter project.

Boogey

B'Boomelang
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
200
Reaction score
11
Could anybody help me please to solve the question if Lawrence Wackett's fighter design of 1930,
named Warrigal II, derivative of RAAF R. E. S. built Warrigal I two seat training aircraft,
was to be single or two seat machine.
I never saw a photo of sketch or draught of the aircraft and some roots say that it had to be two,
others, that single seat fighter, by the way called " the Australian first indigenous fighter ".

Sorry for my tragic English language but I'm Polish.
If somebody needs any informations about Polish aviation history I'll help with pleasure.

P. S. This topic can be treated as a place for discussion the Australian pre - war aviation,
specially Mr. Wackett's designs.
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,033
Reaction score
3,727
Hi,

a little info about it here;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Wackett
 

toura

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
1,203
Reaction score
101
hi
On photo of a "warrigal"
do " wackett widgeon § warrigal"
 

Boogey

B'Boomelang
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
200
Reaction score
11
I started with Wikipedia, but I haven't found there any conclusive answer :
11 Sources disagree as to whether the Warrigal II was a single-seater or had two seats.
But I'm still hopeful that the question will be solved like many others in aviation history.

@ toura The photo You mean shows Warrigal I trainer :)
 

Boogey

B'Boomelang
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
200
Reaction score
11
@ Justo Miranda So we have another entry of the Wackett Warrigal I training aircraft ;
the description by the photo is wrong as the Wackett Warrigal II fighter was never been built,
just because of lack of funds. There's can't be any photo of the aircraft, so please don't look for it ;D
Everytime everywhere You'll find only the Warrigal I.
 

Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,639
Reaction score
956
Boogey said:
...as the Wackett Warrigal II fighter was never been built, just because of lack of funds...

According to "Technology in Australia 1788-1988", a prototype Warrigal II was built (and it was a single-seater). Does anyone know if this is considered a reliable source?

http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/tia/498.html#2042

"Two other aircraft were developed at Randwick to the prototype stage: Warrigal 1 (a trainer) and Warrigal 11 a single seat fighter. As a result of a government-sponsored report, the Randwick Station was closed in 1931: Wackett resigned from the R.A.A.F. and transferred, with some personnel and equipment to Cockatoo Dockyard."
 

Boogey

B'Boomelang
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
200
Reaction score
11
OK, seems it was my mistake to write that the Wackett Warrigal II was never been built,
'cause a few roots really indicate its prototype stage.
Anyway it looks like only one photo of Warrigal exists in internet and it's of the Warrigal I.
The more strange that the prototype was built and nobody remember
if the aircraft was a single or two seater.
 

Attachments

  • RAAF R. E. S. Warrigal I.jpg
    RAAF R. E. S. Warrigal I.jpg
    2.8 KB · Views: 538

blockhaj

Swedish "want to be" aviation specialist
Joined
Feb 9, 2017
Messages
162
Reaction score
71
 

Similar threads

Top