Archer’s really come under fire these days.
There's a line in the Wall Street Millennial video "This is complete nonsense", which was indeed pretty much my opinion of the entire video. Someone calling themselves "Wall Street Millennial" would not be my immediate choice for deep analysis of an aerospace development cycle, and that seems to be confirmed by their apparent conviction that the normal amount of design change inherent in testing necessarily means fraud has happened.The only real criticism you could level at Archer is that they are being overly optimistic regarding their certification timelines considering the slow progress they've made regarding flight testing. But as far as exaggerating the value of their order book to make them seem successful, literally EVERY other player in this business is doing the same. Also regarding the empty factory, wouldn't it make sense for the definitive production conforming version to begin flight testing before you really start ramping up production ?
Only the archer bit tbh - those of us with an aero structures background look at the archer design and wonder how it works. Still, major parts of the aerostructure are being built in Bristol. I imagine I will hear things eventually.A good reading, pretty sobering.
"...According to BETA, the ALIA MV250 variant is tailored for contested logistics and battlefield environments, bridging the gap between rotary-wing aircraft and ground-based tactical vehicles. The platform is built to support distributed operations, enhancing mobility, survivability, and sustainment for forces operating in denied or degraded areas..."
"Instead of relying on a single aircraft, a network of autonomous cargo planes could create a resilient and unpredictable logistics web. This approach frees larger aircraft like the C-17 and C-130 to focus on strategic, long-haul missions, while smaller autonomous platforms take on shorter, riskier deliveries to austere or dispersed locations,” the spokesperson said. “REFORPAC also showed how autonomy can reduce the logistics burden on Airmen, enabling them to focus on higher-priority mission tasks.”
electrek.co
Any black smoke plume that you can safely limp away from on your own after a more or less gentle touchdown is a good(ish?) landing...At least no one died.
![]()
Two eVTOLs from XPeng AeroHT collide and crash during air show
Two eVTOLs from XPeng AeroHT collided in the air during an air show rehearsal, resulting in a crash and injuries.electrek.co
View: https://x.com/yicaichina/status/1967936874485518850
Unfortunately that *utterly* reckless attitude seems to be more and more a sign of the times in *all* walks of life around the globe...From what I've heard the crosswinds had forced the PLAAF rotary wing rehearsals to be postponed (cancelled?), but Xpeng/AeroHT thought they knew better. You can see how hard the wind's blowing even in the crash footage. Too much marketing, not enough engineering (or common sense)!
The long term business case probably isn't going to be helped by the 100mph East West Rail route between Oxford and Cambridge that is currently being built - Oxford to Bedford is in place, Bedford to Cambridge is under consultation at the minute WRT the precise route.
![]()
Pioneering Oxford-Cambridge electric air-taxi project launches
The project aims to test the commercial and operational viability of an electric air-taxi between Oxford and Cambridge.www.bbc.com
He's basing his case on the existing rail-route, Oxford to Cambridge via London in 2 hours 50, not the in-progress East West Rail, which will be 1 hour 35.An interesting take on why air taxis could work in the UK.
![]()
Why I'm Optimistic About Flying Taxis
A Business Case For a British Air-Travel Revolutionandrew480813.substack.com
Following the "if you build it, they will come" trope is not exactly the smartest business model...He's basing his case on the existing rail-route, Oxford to Cambridge via London in 2 hours 50, not the in-progress East West Rail, which will be 1 hour 35.
Meanwhile his assumption of 100 trips per day per aircraft is hopelessly optimistic. Uber/taxi figures are more like a tenth of that. Even ignoring the usage rate this implies, you simply aren't going to get 10 hours of VFR usage per day every day in the UK, which means IFR becomes a necessary part of the operation, and you need at least three IFR rated pilots per aircraft (two to split each day into two shifts, and a third so you can cover weekends on a rota). We still don't know where all these pilots are supposed to come from. And similarly for certified aviation mechanics.
That's neat. Just wondering why they didn't do it earlier. I think the current S4 model could be a nice replacement in the category of small helicopters like Little BirdJoby notches first flight for hybrid VTOL aircraft
![]()
Joby notches first flight for hybrid VTOL aircraft - Breaking Defense
Joby plans to manufacture the hybrid electric vertical takeoff aircraft while L3Harris will provide its mission systems to pitch to military customers.breakingdefense.com
If sustained hover is not a priority it should work wellAnd discard the high loaded rotors![]()
And now valued at over $1B on initial week of offering.Electric aircraft maker Beta Technologies files for US IPO
Regards,
While other competitors in the eVTOL space are increasingly looking toward hybrid powertrains for their own aircraft, Honda is a notable exception, as its eVTOL was intended to be hybrid-electric from the outset. “We are an automobile company; we know the battery technologies,” said Mashio. “When we decided to start this project, we knew that battery technology might not be there as much as we had hoped.” Although Honda wouldn’t rule out a future fully-electric aircraft variant in line with battery maturation, “for the time being, I think the hybrid systems are practical,” he said.