US Supersonic Transport(SST) Program post-1971

I'm so glad the ICAO has unclenched about composite structures not being allowed...

The Lockheed design is very weird, was not expecting engines above and below the wing like that.
 

Attachments

  • 486650983_9352889074764945_2960498760852372430_n.jpg
    486650983_9352889074764945_2960498760852372430_n.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 28
  • home-horizon-airlines.jpg
    home-horizon-airlines.jpg
    99.9 KB · Views: 13
  • home-horizon-sustainability.jpg
    home-horizon-sustainability.jpg
    98.8 KB · Views: 13
  • overture-commercial.jpg
    overture-commercial.jpg
    82 KB · Views: 14
  • 220719_boom_usaf_01-640.jpg
    220719_boom_usaf_01-640.jpg
    338.3 KB · Views: 12
  • 220719_boom_northropgrumman_01-640.jpg
    220719_boom_northropgrumman_01-640.jpg
    302.7 KB · Views: 21
Last edited:
Overture is becoming a bit extreme and a scary aircraft.
 

Attachments

  • 482056423_946090041027248_1934000674840331063_n.jpg
    482056423_946090041027248_1934000674840331063_n.jpg
    199.2 KB · Views: 24
  • GVgk9mYa8AAVror.jpg
    GVgk9mYa8AAVror.jpg
    138.2 KB · Views: 30
Last edited:

These NASA-funded studies explored with Lockheed the feasibility of hydrogen jet commercial aircraft. One of them aimed at comparing Jet A and LH2 for going supersonic assuming M=2.7 cruise, 234 PAX, and 4200 NM of range. That glorious 326-ft-long double-decker was about half of the MGTOW of the Jet A equivalent. Roughly a third more energy-efficient as well! (Brewer, 1991)
 
Back
Top Bottom