A friend in Seattle got this yesterday. The thing is like 3m long and very heavy. Unfortunately the wings are missing.
Could be a Boeing in house made, or done by Pacmin for Boeing according to someone how knows.
From the small stakes on the nose and the tailplane shape, looks like a 1968-69 config.
Will make more pictures in Sept.

View attachment 781578

View attachment 781579

View attachment 781580

View attachment 781581

View attachment 781582

View attachment 781583
I think those are the very front of the ogival wings.
 
Thanks galgot-san‼︎ What a incredible model it is.
Fuselage bottom shape is quite impressive and very beautiful.
Supersonic area rule?
 

Attachments

  • fuselage front bottom.jpg
    fuselage front bottom.jpg
    217.7 KB · Views: 61
  • fuselage tail bottom.jpg
    fuselage tail bottom.jpg
    191.4 KB · Views: 67
  • bottom.jpg
    bottom.jpg
    957.9 KB · Views: 73
Last edited:
I can't find ventral fin in this model.
Hi Blackkite San, checked the L-2000 model. indeed it must have had the ventral fin originally but was damaged at some point, that place being repainted :

IMG_3733.jpg

Today, had the chance to visit the 2707-300 mockup nose at Museum of Flight Restoration Center at Everett.
Will post only one picture of it cause there are already tons of the thing online. Next to it, one can notice these nice nose and tail 2707-200 cutaway models. There's a few pictures of these online too :

IMG_3760.jpg
IMG_3741.jpg
IMG_3745.jpg

I was very lucky to be shown the stuff they normally don't show to visitors, and the rest of that cutaway model exists, and it's huge.
All in pieces, and damaged, but apparently all is there. Hundreds of pieces on the floor and several shelves. One of their guys had started restoring it (these nose and tail) but work have been halted for now :

IMG_3812.jpg
IMG_3767.jpg
IMG_3769.jpg
IMG_3770.jpg
IMG_3780.jpg
IMG_3779.jpg
IMG_3792.jpg

I believe this model was meant to fixed on a wall or some kind of rig by the starboard wing root, only the whole fuselage and port wing/tail being built. I couldn't find the engines, but there was unopened boxes on the shelves, so they may have been in there.

IMG_3805.jpg
IMG_3811.jpg

That's for now.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3779.jpg
    IMG_3779.jpg
    557.5 KB · Views: 49
Last edited:
Follow up :
View: https://youtu.be/rdZSQ1BLV28

Length is 14.4' - 4.38 m. This is the huge in house 2707-300 model fuselage I posted about earlier. All wood, obviously took some beatup but still beautiful. Incredibly, someone at the Restoration Center at Everett knew the guy who built it for Boeing.
Thing going to be done first is having a stand made for it.

IMG_3896.jpg

IMG_3902.jpg

IMG_3885.jpg

IMG_3897.jpg
IMG_3898.jpg
IMG_3908.jpg
IMG_3914.jpg
IMG_3918.jpg

IMG_3919.jpg

Voilà... I have picts of other SST related stuff, but not as interesting and already seen. Will post later maybe.
 
Last edited:
Hello, first time posting but does anyone have studies citing good performance metrics for the JTF-17, TJ70A4 or any of the other non-GE American SST engines? Also looking for any data on the Olympus 593 Mk.610+25% proposed for Concorde B. I'm trying to make realistic configs for Kerbal Space Program RP-1 for anyone wondering :p

Thanks!
 
Hi, would anyone happen to have any photos of the JTF-17 in it's engine mount for the 2707? all the images I've found so far have the mock up for the L2000, with only one supposedly being for the 2707.
 

Attachments

  • 1761561042783.png
    1761561042783.png
    1,015.4 KB · Views: 84
Length is 14.4' - 4.38 m. This is the huge in house 2707-300 model fuselage I posted about earlier. All wood, obviously took some beatup but still beautiful. Incredibly, someone at the Restoration Center at Everett knew the guy who built it for Boeing.
Wow, 1/20 scale!
 
Hi! SCAT-15F patent.
 

Attachments

  • stock-vector--nasa-airplane-patent-sleek-super-sonic-jet-design-by-nasa-2326076979.jpg
    stock-vector--nasa-airplane-patent-sleek-super-sonic-jet-design-by-nasa-2326076979.jpg
    413.5 KB · Views: 50
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • sst1.jpg
    sst1.jpg
    258.4 KB · Views: 45
  • Boeing-Supersonic-Transport-Brochure-1960-1-768x986.jpg
    Boeing-Supersonic-Transport-Brochure-1960-1-768x986.jpg
    92.3 KB · Views: 40
  • B2707-300.jpg
    B2707-300.jpg
    126.6 KB · Views: 37
  • 55e5c99d-832e-487c-9697-7eeee6e3c77c.jpg
    55e5c99d-832e-487c-9697-7eeee6e3c77c.jpg
    430.1 KB · Views: 41
Last edited:

Attachments

  • Early vg concepts.jpg
    Early vg concepts.jpg
    92.5 KB · Views: 28
  • Early vg concept 2.jpg
    Early vg concept 2.jpg
    89.5 KB · Views: 25
  • Douglas configulation 1961.jpg
    Douglas configulation 1961.jpg
    98.1 KB · Views: 22
  • Convair configulation 1961.jpg
    Convair configulation 1961.jpg
    69.4 KB · Views: 21
  • Boeing configulation 1961.jpg
    Boeing configulation 1961.jpg
    80.4 KB · Views: 22
  • Lockheed configulation 1961.jpg
    Lockheed configulation 1961.jpg
    98.6 KB · Views: 26
  • North American cofigulation 1961.jpg
    North American cofigulation 1961.jpg
    75.4 KB · Views: 28
  • sst design in 1961.jpg
    sst design in 1961.jpg
    152.1 KB · Views: 25
  • North American SST design evolution.jpg
    North American SST design evolution.jpg
    215.3 KB · Views: 25
  • North American Aviation SST’s Men and their toys.jpg
    North American Aviation SST’s Men and their toys.jpg
    426.7 KB · Views: 29
Last edited:
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • transport research configulation in 1960.jpg
    transport research configulation in 1960.jpg
    89.1 KB · Views: 32
  • Scat configulation.jpg
    Scat configulation.jpg
    443.5 KB · Views: 29
  • Scat 4.jpg
    Scat 4.jpg
    73.9 KB · Views: 28
  • Scat 15 model.jpg
    Scat 15 model.jpg
    673.9 KB · Views: 24
  • Scat 16 model.jpg
    Scat 16 model.jpg
    668.8 KB · Views: 25
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • Scat 15-3.jpg
    Scat 15-3.jpg
    72.6 KB · Views: 22
  • Scat 16.jpg
    Scat 16.jpg
    74.3 KB · Views: 29
  • Scat 17.jpg
    Scat 17.jpg
    80.5 KB · Views: 22
  • Boeing proposal 1964.jpg
    Boeing proposal 1964.jpg
    75 KB · Views: 25
  • Lockheed proposal 1964.jpg
    Lockheed proposal 1964.jpg
    84.6 KB · Views: 24
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • MDC AST 1975.jpg
    MDC AST 1975.jpg
    85.9 KB · Views: 29
  • Lockheed Mach 2.2 AST 1975.jpg
    Lockheed Mach 2.2 AST 1975.jpg
    87.4 KB · Views: 29
  • Lockheed revised Mach 2,55 AST 1075.jpg
    Lockheed revised Mach 2,55 AST 1075.jpg
    91 KB · Views: 27
  • hsct-41.jpg
    hsct-41.jpg
    73.5 KB · Views: 42
Hi! Lockheed SST design evolution.
Not same scale.
 

Attachments

  • lockheed sst.jpg
    lockheed sst.jpg
    147.7 KB · Views: 51
  • 676adcad-17c1-4d8a-8f91-c13e44073a96.jpg
    676adcad-17c1-4d8a-8f91-c13e44073a96.jpg
    35 KB · Views: 48
Last edited:
Hi! AIR FORCE magazine May 1961.
 

Attachments

  • 0561mach3-01.jpg
    0561mach3-01.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 112
  • 0561mach3-02.jpg
    0561mach3-02.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 58
  • 0561mach3-03.jpg
    0561mach3-03.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 49
  • 0561mach3-04.jpg
    0561mach3-04.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 45
  • 0561mach3-05.jpg
    0561mach3-05.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 63
Yeah, I have a PDF of the 2707-300 General Characteristics handbook (pretty sure I got it from this thread!), but it doesn't show a seating layout for the 321pax version. Just that basically the entire fuselage would be different between that version and the 234pax arrangement.

That PDF does show seating for the 298pax all-tourist class. Mostly 3+3, with 3+2 at the ends.
Yes I answer late but it's rude not to replyLOL. Here is the 321 pax layout.
 

Attachments

  • 321 pax 2707-300.jpg
    321 pax 2707-300.jpg
    222.7 KB · Views: 154

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom