• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

US Lunar Lander Concepts

circle-5

ACCESS: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
1,159
Reaction score
191
The first three spacecraft studied under NASA's Apollo program designation were proposals by Martin, General Electric and Convair Astronautics (General Dynamics) in partnership with Avco.

Depicted here is the Convair Phase C lunar lander, in which the entire Apollo vehicle landed on the moon -- there was no separate LEM. Enclosed within the spacecraft is an M-2 re-entry lifting body with seating for up to five crew. This lifting body could land on any runway (though its preferred destination was Texas).

To put this NASA-funded project in proper context, it should be noted that it dates back to early 1961, before any human went into space, and before JFK made his speech about sending a man to the moon.

Shown here are photos of the manufacturer's model and inboard profile of the spacecraft. Note the four landing legs (shown in retracted position) surrounding the eight-engine cluster.
 

Attachments

  • Convair Apollo M-2 01.jpg
    Convair Apollo M-2 01.jpg
    137.4 KB · Views: 370
  • Convair Apollo M-2 02.jpg
    Convair Apollo M-2 02.jpg
    139 KB · Views: 376
  • GD Convair Avco Apollo M-2 1961.gif
    GD Convair Avco Apollo M-2 1961.gif
    76 KB · Views: 474

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,175
Reaction score
1,390
First time I saw it I thought that John occasionally uploaded Ares CEV instead of correct pics...great and rare stuff, thanks!
 

Nik

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
483
Reaction score
129
Well, they certainly didn't lack for imagination !!

Makes you wonder how things would have fared if 'lifting bodies' rather than Mercury / Gemini / Apollo 're-entry cones' had become the return method of choice. Maybe the X-15 and other X-craft would have bridged the gap up to orbit, giving a range of Shuttle sizes rather than the unhappy compromise that ensued...
 

blackstar

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2008
Messages
1,827
Reaction score
309
Nik said:
Makes you wonder how things would have fared if 'lifting bodies' rather than Mercury / Gemini / Apollo 're-entry cones' had become the return method of choice. Maybe the X-15 and other X-craft would have bridged the gap up to orbit, giving a range of Shuttle sizes rather than the unhappy compromise that ensued...

That assumes that lifting bodies were realistic at that time given their level of technology.

One problem with asking what-if for different technological paths is that you end up assuming that the rejected technology (spacecraft/aircraft, etc.) would have worked. But that is not guaranteed and in fact the chosen path was probably chosen at least in part because people considered it more realistic.

Lifting bodies had a lot of challenges, including heating, control, and even such esoteric things as modeling and simulation (it is easier to model a blunt body than it is a complex lifting body shape).
 

blackstar

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2008
Messages
1,827
Reaction score
309
circle-5 said:
The first three spacecraft studied under NASA's Apollo program designation were proposals by Martin, General Electric and Convair Astronautics (General Dynamics) in partnership with Avco.

There are some interesting parallels between the Mercury program and Apollo. In both cases, after early work, NASA then settled on the design that they wanted. In Apollo there were several early designs that were not the simple cone shape. Then NASA said that they wanted a cone and that's what everybody proposed in the second round.

I'm not very familiar with the decision making process, but I suspect that NASA dictated the cone shape because they figured that it would be much simpler to design and build than some of the more complex ideas that were initially proposed by the contractors, like this one.
 

taildragger

You can count on me - I won a contest
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
330
Reaction score
226
circle-5 said:
The first three spacecraft studied under NASA's Apollo program designation were proposals by Martin, General Electric and Convair Astronautics (General Dynamics) in partnership with Avco.

Depicted here is the Convair Phase C lunar lander, in which the entire Apollo vehicle landed on the moon -- there was no separate LEM. Enclosed within the spacecraft is an M-2 re-entry lifting body with seating for up to five crew. This lifting body could land on any runway (though its preferred destination was Texas).

To put this NASA-funded project in proper context, it should be noted that it dates back to early 1961, before any human went into space, and before JFK made his speech about sending a man to the moon.

Shown here are photos of the manufacturer's model and inboard profile of the spacecraft. Note the four landing legs (shown in retracted position) surrounding the eight-engine cluster.

The drawing suggests that there was a separate Command Module that's not depicted. It looks like the hull in the photos is the Mission Module and the drawing depicts a "Command to Mission Module Passage" but it's not clear what the Command module is or where it goes.
 

circle-5

ACCESS: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
1,159
Reaction score
191
taildragger said:
The drawing suggests that there was a separate Command Module that's not depicted. It looks like the hull in the photos is the Mission Module and the drawing depicts a "Command to Mission Module Passage" but it's not clear what the Command module is or where it goes.

The M-2 re-entry vehicle was to be used as the Command Module. The passage in question is simply a roof hatch on the M-2, which leads to the Mission Module area.

I have a Convair/Avco document, optimistically entitled Apollo Final Study Report, dated 15 May, 1961. This contains additional details and diagrams about these early Convair proposals. At 4.3MB, it's too big to post, but I can send it to you via PM, if you're interested...
 

jzichek

ACCESS: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
275
Reaction score
94
Website
www.patreon.com
I found the attached artwork posted at http://yuripasholok.livejournal.com/393991.html, need help identifying it. Would be great to find a 3-view and more information on the vehicle, if it isn't an artist's invention. Apologize if this has been posted here before; moderator, feel free to move this to an existing thread, if applicable.


Thanks,


Jared
 

Attachments

  • image7.jpg
    image7.jpg
    140.2 KB · Views: 519

magnus_z

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Aug 15, 2009
Messages
115
Reaction score
20
jzichek said:
I found the attached artwork posted at http://yuripasholok.livejournal.com/393991.html, need help identifying it. Would be great to find a 3-view and more information on the vehicle, if it isn't an artist's invention. Apologize if this has been posted here before; moderator, feel free to move this to an existing thread, if applicable.
Orionblamblam :"This is one of the more bizarre of the series, pretty much inexplicable without some sort of caption. Of which there wasn’t one. Clearly some sort of lunar lander. The “things” on the ends of the arms appear to have transparent bubbles and reflectors, so perhaps this was supposed to be a solar powered… something."
http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=4114

Also:
http://punkadiddle.blogspot.com/2011/03/joseph-n-bell-seven-into-space-1960.html
 

jzichek

ACCESS: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
275
Reaction score
94
Website
www.patreon.com
Thank you for the links! At least we know it's likely a Martin project. Not surprising that it's taken from Scott's site; Yuri Pasholok has been reposting material from there for a while now, often without attribution, which is bad etiquette.
 

blackstar

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2008
Messages
1,827
Reaction score
309
I saw that in a kids' book on space published in the 1960s at some point.

I assume the things on the end are some kind of magnetic propulsors, lifting the vehicle up by pushing off a magnetic field.

You might note that it bears a little resemblance to the famous painting from 2001 of astronauts standing by as a lunar lander sets down on the Moon.
 

Attachments

  • 2001-A-Space-Odyssey-the-60s-701994_582_768.jpg
    2001-A-Space-Odyssey-the-60s-701994_582_768.jpg
    201 KB · Views: 465

Orionblamblam

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
1,917
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
blackstar said:
You might note that it bears a little resemblance to the famous painting from 2001 of astronauts standing by as a lunar lander sets down on the Moon.

Not near as much as the 2001 painting resembles *this* one:
http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=3229

(see link for higher rez)
 

Attachments

  • image6aa.jpg
    image6aa.jpg
    108.3 KB · Views: 306

Orionblamblam

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
1,917
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
jzichek said:
At least we know it's likely a Martin project.

Not "likely," "was." Although "project" is stretching the term.

Not surprising that it's taken from Scott's site; Yuri Pasholok has been reposting material from there for a while now, often without attribution, which is bad etiquette.

Hrrrmmph.

cat_hmmph.jpg


This is why I've been adding "up-ship.com" or "aerospaceprojcetsreview.com" to most of the pics I post, even the really high rez ones. Not that I'm trying to lay claim to them, but just so that there is some hope of trackback.

I've posted a comment there with a link back to my post. It'll be interesting to see if'n it shows up.
 

Taranov

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
119
Reaction score
15
Sorry for stupid situation.
It's not my artwork, source already posted here. In my blog i already add links to original posts. Up-ship is famous blog for me. I just like crazy inventions of 20-s - 60-s, and stealing any content not in my plans.
Some my "trophy" from archives also stealing from blog with adding "new" copyrights, it's a reason why i start add copyrights on the my content.
Sorry again for stupid situation, it's shame for me.... :(
 

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,719
Reaction score
875
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Grumman LEM model by Precise found on eBay.

URL:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/GRUMMAN-Lunar-Module-Contractor-Model-Precision-1960s-Apollo-RARE-Great-Find-/220955841709?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3371fe94ad
 

Attachments

  • 548348036_o.jpg
    548348036_o.jpg
    138.6 KB · Views: 37
  • 548348011_o.jpg
    548348011_o.jpg
    102.7 KB · Views: 25
  • 548347975_o.jpg
    548347975_o.jpg
    169.9 KB · Views: 23
  • 548347949_o.jpg
    548347949_o.jpg
    131 KB · Views: 239
  • 548347949_o.jpg
    548347949_o.jpg
    131 KB · Views: 251
  • 548348011_o.jpg
    548348011_o.jpg
    102.7 KB · Views: 264
  • 548347863_o.jpg
    548347863_o.jpg
    182.3 KB · Views: 267
  • 548347889_o.jpg
    548347889_o.jpg
    119.5 KB · Views: 276

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,719
Reaction score
875
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Grumman LEM model by Precise found on eBay.

Very nice model and in good condition. Notice how the white hasn't yellowed over the years.
 

Attachments

  • 548348098_o.jpg
    548348098_o.jpg
    115 KB · Views: 24
  • 548348126_o.jpg
    548348126_o.jpg
    136.9 KB · Views: 27

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
15,036
Reaction score
4,780
A piece of Lockheed Missiles & Space Co. RIFT related concept art.

ADDITIONAL DETAILS: This is an original press photo. Photo measures 10 x 8inches. Photo is dated 12-12-1963.
 

Attachments

  • 4864017.jpg
    4864017.jpg
    135.4 KB · Views: 65
  • 4864016.jpg
    4864016.jpg
    131.4 KB · Views: 68

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,719
Reaction score
875
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
NASA lunar lander concept photo circa 1992.

Source:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/BEAUTIFUL-VINTAGE-OFFICIAL-NASA-LUNAR-SPACECRAFT-COMPONENTS-ARTIST-CONCEPT-PHOTO-/400590327561?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item5d450b4f09
 

Attachments

  • $T2eC16V,!)UFI,jKTlbHBSYUPvTRww~~60_57.JPG
    $T2eC16V,!)UFI,jKTlbHBSYUPvTRww~~60_57.JPG
    187.5 KB · Views: 78
  • $T2eC16R,!zYFIblumgkjBSYUPy7N)!~~60_57.JPG
    $T2eC16R,!zYFIblumgkjBSYUPy7N)!~~60_57.JPG
    134.9 KB · Views: 76
  • $T2eC16Z,!yoFIfH4UVQUBSYUP14C0!~~60_57.JPG
    $T2eC16Z,!yoFIfH4UVQUBSYUP14C0!~~60_57.JPG
    103 KB · Views: 79

asiscan

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
50
Reaction score
23
Just wandering if anyone has any available info (eg: specs) or arrangement drawings of the General Dynamics/Convair 'Apollo' Lunar Excursion Module proposal of 1962. I have found several "pre 2013 NTRS lockdown" pdf links to several proposals, but *surprise* - they are no longer available. What I have found are about 40 (very good) photos of the GD/Convair LEM mockup at the San Diego Air and Space Museum 'flickr' site but sadly no info. Any ideas?
GD/Convair LEM photos at:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/7142968263
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,175
Reaction score
1,390
Give links to the deleted papers.
Apparently many of forum members could have them downloaded before NASA STI went nuts.
 

asiscan

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
50
Reaction score
23
Here are two 'discontinued' links of the GD/CONVAIR proposal but I suspect that they might only cover the "direct ascent" mission configuration and not the 1962 LEM proposal.

GD PROJECT APOLLO FINAL REPORT Volume IV GROWTH AND ADVANCED CONCEPTS

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790076966_1979076966.pdf

GD PROJECT APOLLO FINAL REPORT VOLUME V. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740073799_1974073799.pdf

I come across other GD/Convair doc links about a year ago and am trying to "backtrack" but it was on a now dead hard drive.
 

RAP

ACCESS: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
695
Reaction score
473
...
 

Attachments

  • NASA Lander 1963.png
    NASA Lander 1963.png
    685.8 KB · Views: 96

Similar threads

Top