US Army in 1975 (No Vietnam)

uk 75

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
3,294
Reaction score
2,111
If the US had not become bogged down in the Vietnam war and continued instead to concentrate on its primary Cold War role of defending Germany would we have seen the following developed further.

Main Battle tank

MBT 70 was principally a victim of its own complexity and the poor weapons system (Shillelagh). However, with time and money on their hands and the Russians having invaded Czechosolvakia in 1968 maybe it could have been brought into service.

MICV

Again, although MICV 70 was expensive, it could, like the similarly costly German Marder, have been made to work.

AA system

A lot of effort had already been spent on the Mauler system. Another possible recovered system.

SPG

A successor for M109 (XM 179?) was planned but had to be axed because of the lingering costs of Vietnam.

Although expensive and perhaps difficult to operate, a force in US Seventh Army made up of this equipment might have given the Soviets sleepless nights.

UK 75
 

Ranger6

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
44
Reaction score
4
Interesting post UK75, you raise a good point about what could have been if the US Army wasn't bogged down (physically and financially) in Vietnam. That said, let's keep in mind that two of the systems you mention, the upgraded MBT and the MICV, did in fact come into service -- as the M-1 Abrams and the M-2 Bradley. Granted, the actual production models did not "look" like their progenitors and it would certainly have been nice to have them in service earlier (around the time of the great "tank crisis" in 1973/74 for example), but I don't think their would have been any major difference in what we got and what we would have gotten.

As to the Mauler, my understanding is that the problem was with the missile, not with the mount (a modified M-113).. After all, the US has had a tortured history of trying to develop self-propleeld air defense systems that aren't deadly to enemy aircraft (i.e., DIVADS).

Ta for now!
 

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
2,047
Reaction score
540
And more than likely the Lockheed AH-56 Cheyenne combat helicopter

Regards
Pioneer
 

Ranger6

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
44
Reaction score
4
I don't know about the Cheyenne, Pioneer -- seems to me it would have been the same kind of boondoggle (overly complicated and unable to fulfill its mission profile) as the later Comanche helicopter (cancelled by Donald Rumsfeld). Clearly, the Army needed and would have still needed a purpose built attack helicopter, if there had been no Viet Nam war. Presumably that means we would have gotten the Apache (or something like it) sooner and with a greater time to mature its weapons and avionics.

Ranger6
 

Skybolt

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
2,299
Reaction score
195
Agreed. The AAFSS competition was initiated when during large airborne operations in Vietnam the Army discovered that the Chinooks carrying troops outraced the armed Huey that escorted them. Hence the high speed request for the AAFSS, and things like the capability to fire off-course (the swiveling gunner station on the Cheyenne) with the gun. One possible alternate w/o Vietnam (in the sense, w/o a large scale war in Vietnam) could have been an heavily armored recon heli, useful both in COIN and in an European theater of war.
 

Cobrapilot

It's not a Cobra, but would have been fun to fly!
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
17
Reaction score
10
Cheyenne was way ahead of its time, but the weapons system videos I have seen all showed a very workable and accurate system. The pusher prop was a success, but the one cloud hanging over the program was the 1/2P hop. It is a bit disconcerting to have a main rotor system that wants to come visit the pilots inside about neck high... other than that I would have loved flying it. Given another 6 months time, they would have figured out how to eliminate (or avoid) the 1/2P hop as well.
 

Grey Havoc

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
15,966
Reaction score
5,551
Given another 6 months time, they would have figured out how to eliminate (or avoid) the 1/2P hop as well.

Agreed, though politics (and more than a bit of short sightedness) arguably had more to do with the cancellation.
 

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
2,047
Reaction score
540
On the other side of the coin, I guess there's many a systems and doctrine that were a positive from the US militaries perceptive of Viet Nam.....
-PGM's;
-tactical reconnaissance aircraft and sensor development;
-the doctrine of over reliance on beyond visual AAM's and elimination of gun/cannon on fighter's was wrong;
-the development of a seriouserious appreciation of SEAD, technology, sensors and weapons to suppress and destroy air defence systems;
-modern carrier operations and doctrine;
-the appreciation and establishment of disimulated air combat training and doctrine;
-Special Forces;
-and I guess the biggest learning outcome - never underestimate your opponent or their resolve!!! [well I guess the US military did forget this in the long run - Mogadishu, Afghanistan, Iraq, ......]

Regards
Pioneet
 

Archibald

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
6,071
Reaction score
4,473
"Nuclear energy depot" carries on after 1966 and "save the day" in October 1973 - after pioneering the use of ammonia and methanol in IC engines.

One can dream, no ?
 

riggerrob

I really should change my personal text
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
916
Cheyenne was way ahead of its time, but the weapons system videos I have seen all showed a very workable and accurate system. The pusher prop was a success, but the one cloud hanging over the program was the 1/2P hop. It is a bit disconcerting to have a main rotor system that wants to come visit the pilots inside about neck high... other than that I would have loved flying it. Given another 6 months time, they would have figured out how to eliminate (or avoid) the 1/2P hop as well.
UH-60 solved the problem of "canopy shaving" by installing a taller main rotor mast.
 

Archibald

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
6,071
Reaction score
4,473
They had electronics and mechanical systems on hand to cure that issue by 1972... when the program was canned (facepalm).

I always loved the Cheyenne, so futuristic. It is the B-70 or SR-71 of helicopters.
 
Top