• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

United Launch Alliance introduces Vulcan next generation launcher

MihoshiK

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
155
Reaction score
69
After going to the Astrobotic site, I see most things have not changed. USAF requirement, NASA launch facility - it's all there. As a taxpayer, I had no input.
Sure you did. You got to vote. That's how these things work.
 

edwest

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
943
Reaction score
202
Vote? On this? No. The military and NASA take the money and do what they want. The Pentagon doesn't call me for my input either. The US citizen is totally disconnected from 'commercial space.'
 

MihoshiK

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
155
Reaction score
69
Vote? On this? No. The military and NASA take the money and do what they want. The Pentagon doesn't call me for my input either. The US citizen is totally disconnected from 'commercial space.'
Don't be dumber than you have to be mate. NASA and the Pentagon take their orders from politicians, you vote for the politicians.
No shit you don't get a direct say in how your country is run. You live in a Federal Republic, not a Direct Democracy.
Mob rule is a terrible system by which to run a country.

*Edited a typo.
 
Last edited:

edwest

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
943
Reaction score
202
Vote? On this? No. The military and NASA take the money and do what they want. The Pentagon doesn't call me for my input either. The US citizen is totally disconnected from 'commercial space.'
Don't be dumber than you have to be mate. NASA and the Pentagon take their orders from politicians, you vote for the politicians.
No shit you don't get a direct say in how your country is run. You live in a Federal Republic, not a Direct Democracy.
Mob rule is a terrible system by which to run a country.

*Edited a typo.

No thanks for your stupid reply. Stay civil mate. I don't care about politicians. They don't "run" anything in the US.
 

Byeman

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
782
Reaction score
15
After going to the Astrobotic site, I see most things have not changed. USAF requirement, NASA launch facility - it's all there. As a taxpayer, I had no input.
What the heck are you talking about? What USAF requirement? Astrobotic has nothing to do with the USAF. Also, there is no NASA launch facility involved.
 

MihoshiK

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
155
Reaction score
69
After going to the Astrobotic site, I see most things have not changed. USAF requirement, NASA launch facility - it's all there. As a taxpayer, I had no input.
What the heck are you talking about? What USAF requirement? Astrobotic has nothing to do with the USAF. Also, there is no NASA launch facility involved.
He's the kind of guy who thinks that since he pays taxes he must have a direct say in each government project that strikes his fancy. That should tell you everything you need to know.
 

Moose

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
1,226
Reaction score
205

We’ve updated the Payload Fairings of the World infog to include Vulcan. More whales...
Why did SpaceX go with such a small fairing when both the Atlas V and Delta IV Heavy have large fairings?
SpaceX had to develop their own from just general industry knowledge, and it was originally sized for earlier blocs of F9. Going huge right away would have been more difficult and expensive, at a time when they needed the money and effort elsewhere. The money they've put into fairing development has gone into developing reuse instead of stretching or increasing diameter, and their long-term hope for large payloads is Starship anyway.

ULA's fairings on the other hand come from 2 established producers. Atlas uses fairings produced by RUAG, who've made fairings for Arianespace for decades, and Boeing has built their aluminum fairings forever. So acquiring larger fairings for their rockets was essentially just as easy as putting the right money in the right place. SpaceX has reportedly made attempts to buy the Atlas V-size RUAG fairings off the shelf but has run into issues closing the deal.
 

Tuna

CLEARANCE: Restricted
Joined
Oct 13, 2016
Messages
36
Reaction score
9
Why did SpaceX go with such a small fairing when both the Atlas V and Delta IV Heavy have large fairings?
What Moose said, and also the SpaceX fairing was sized to fit the payloads that were contracted with them. If you have a payload that needs a bigger one, they'd be happy to serve you, assuming you're willing to pay the cost of developing a bigger fairing. (Which they would then also use with their other payloads.)
 

Byeman

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
782
Reaction score
15
Why did SpaceX go with such a small fairing when both the Atlas V and Delta IV Heavy have large fairings?
Because Atlas V and Delta IV were designed to EELV (DOD) standards. SpaceX chose a fairing size that would encompass most commercial spacecraft.
 

Byeman

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
782
Reaction score
15
ULA's fairings on the other hand come from 2 established producers. Atlas uses fairings produced by RUAG, who've made fairings for Arianespace for decades, and Boeing has built their aluminum fairings forever. So acquiring larger fairings for their rockets was essentially just as easy as putting the right money in the right place. SpaceX has reportedly made attempts to buy the Atlas V-size RUAG fairings off the shelf but has run into issues closing the deal.

not quite so, Atlas V first used its own 4m fairing and so did Delta IV. Also, a composite 5m fairing flew on Delta IV Heavy before the 5m aluminum one.
 

fredymac

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
534
I confess to being underwhelmed. It feels like something that could have been recorded in the 90s. Since they are eschewing reusability, any cost competitiveness will have to come from manufacturing. Something like Relativity Space is doing. I have a feeling that Boeing/Lockheed have told ULA they won't receive the backing to master reusable rockets so they are only getting the money to produce a conventional alternative if Spacex/Blue Origin fail. My bet is ULA won't be around in 10 years or less (assuming political lobbying has its limits).
 

Flyaway

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
3,655
Reaction score
1,550

Flyaway

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
3,655
Reaction score
1,550
Top