- Joined
- 6 November 2010
- Messages
- 6,351
- Reaction score
- 8,226
I have read about that in Tupolev Aircraft since 1922 by Bill Gunston, Putnam 1995. 'Build a better dive bomber than the Ju 88'. He notes it is not substantiated by any proof.The 103U was created at the literal demand of the NIIVVS to build an aircraft just like the Ju-88.
<edit> Something similar referred to in OKB Tupolev by Yefim Gordon and Vladimir Rigmant, Midland 2005 </edit>
The Pe-2 had similar dive brakes to the Ju 88 dive brakes, the 103 prototype did too, the production Tu-2 did not. Pe-2 also derived from Ju 88?
The Focke-Wulf Ta 154 was supposed to be the German equivalent of the DH Mosquito - fast, wooden construction, twin engine - yet nobody ever claimed the Ta 154 was derived from the Mosquito.
- Pe-2 a twin engine, all metal bomber
- Tu-2 a twin engine, all metal bomber
- Ju 88 a twin engine, all metal bomber
Not enough to conclude one, maybe two, derived from the third.
Which equipment was carried over from Ju 88 to Tu-2?
Which structural design features?
Last edited: