I think it was mainly direct at this comment:
No, it isn't so. Have you actually read anything on the topic? Obama and his yes-man Gates are the only ones who want to kill it. Everybody else says we need to buy more of them. The USAF, the think tanks, the pilots, basically anybody who has anything to do with planning the future of airpower in the US says we need more. The whole "the F-22 hasn't bombed camels in Afghanistan" line of reasoning is so . . .well to be polite "uninformed/misguided" that it hardly deserves commenting on.
If studying aeronautical history has taught me anything, it has cured me of the notion that an armed service ever agreed unanimously on anything. Like any group of people, there are always dissenters, and no aircraft project is ever completely supported except in hindsight.
To talk of the USAF as if they are a single mind is just wrong. Do all USAF transport pilots support the F-22, even if it costs the USAF much needed airlift capability? I don't think so. Even in the fighter community there will be those who think the F-35 might be a more flexible weapons system.