Sikorsky S-61 prototypes and projects

Caravellarella

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
30 November 2007
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
438
Dear Boys and Girls, here is a picture with a caption in French of what I believe to be the Sikorsky S-61N full-size mock-up brought to the 1959 Paris Salon; it shows an aerodynamic saucer-shaped fairing covering the main rotor hub. The accompanying article describes the Sikorsky S-61N as being powered by three T-58 engines (like the Sud Aviation SE.3200 Frelon); is this correct for the S-61N design at this stage of development?

The picture comes from the 20th June 1959 issue of Les Ailes......

Terry (Caravellarella)
 

Attachments

  • Sikorsky S-61N transport helicopter mock-up - Les Ailes - No. 1,734 - 20 Juin 1959.......jpg
    Sikorsky S-61N transport helicopter mock-up - Les Ailes - No. 1,734 - 20 Juin 1959.......jpg
    913.5 KB · Views: 1,350
Slightly enhanced... (wish I could do better... :-[)
 

Attachments

  • S-61N enhanced.gif
    S-61N enhanced.gif
    505.2 KB · Views: 743
Stargazer2006 said:
Slightly enhanced... (wish I could do better... :-[)

Dear Stéphane, here is the same picture without Chicago Helciopter Airways titles added above the cheatline......

http://www.aerofiles.com/sik-s61n.jpg

Terry (Caravellarella)
 
I got to fly in one these bad boys when I left my FOB for the long trip back home. Looks pretty much like the one in the picture except without the rotor hub fairing and the inclusion of a thimble-shaped radome on the nose.
 
Has anyone got any pics of the H-3 gunship proposal and H-2 Tomahawk?

Cheers
 
frank,


There was a proper S-61 gunship proposed as part of the AAFSS not just the S-67. According to Harding's US Army Aviation book, the fly off was at Edwards AFB with the H-2, the H-3 gunship etc etc

Cheers
 
There was a proper S-61 gunship...
I've sen an image of this, but I'm damned if I can find it!
ISTR it was an H-3 without the hull bottom, and an
undernose turret with a MG of some sort...
I know it's out there, but where??




cheers,
Robin.
 
Been trying to locate that one but I can't remember ever seeing it, myself. :-\
 
Did Westland also obtain rights to manufacture the S-61R or just the boat-hulled 61D?

Just wondering if the 61R was ever proposed for UK requirements.
 
Kiltonge said:
Did Westland also obtain rights to manufacture the S-61R or just the boat-hulled 61D?

Just wondering if the 61R was ever proposed for UK requirements.

I believe they only licensed the baseline S-61; several sources say Augusta was the only foreign licencee for the S-61R. If Westland did have an S-61R license, I'd think they'd have offered that instead of developing the Commando for troop lift.
 
Cheers TomS. Yes, the Commando was the oddity that made me wonder.

As a tangent, found this in Flight whilst digging for info:

The [Westland] Wiltshire, also to fly this year [1960], will be an anglicised Sikorsky S-61 with twin [Napier] Gazelles.

http://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1960/1960%20-%200065.PDF

There is a January 1960 reference to a triple-Gnome engined S-61 proposal; that shadows a Sikorsky offering for a triple-T58 installation for hot-and-high.
 
famvburg said:
Weren't all of the S-61s boat-hulled?


I guess it depends on how you define a boat hull. The S-61R had the rear ramp and a flatter, squared-off aft hull, rather than a tapered boat-tail as in the original design (It also did away wiht the outriggers in favor of sponsons, and switched up the landing gear arrangement from a tail-drager to a tricycle arrangement). The forward end did retain that boat-like stemline, though. And the R was still able to water-land because the hull was still watertight.
 
I was always under the impression that even the Jolly Green Giant was amphibious. So it isn't?
 
famvburg said:
I was always under the impression that even the Jolly Green Giant was amphibious. So it isn't?


That's not what I said. The S-61R/HH-3E could land on water -- the hull was waterproof and would float. But if you look at the original S-61, that hull has a v-shaped bottom with a distinct keel and chines where the bottom meet the sides. That's the boat hull, which makes for better stability and on water, and probably better take-off characteristics because it would unstick more cleanly (like a flying boat). The S61R has a flat bottom and a more rounded transition from the bottom to the hull sides, which made it less suited for water operations.


Of course, in practice, neither type did water landings very often so the difference isn't all that crucial.
 
I assume that much of Sikorsky's hydrodynamic research into the boat-hull was licensed to Sud Aviation along with the gearbox and rotors when developing the Super Frelon.

The keel and chine shapes are pretty much identical, just scaled-up.
 
China has opened preliminary talks with Sikorsky which may lead to the
placing of an order for S-61Ns. It is reported that although China might
have a military application for the helicopters they would be sold by
Sikorsky in standard civil S-61N form.
The company is reported by Reuter to be negotiating also with Romania
which is understood to be interested in licence-production of the S-61N.

http://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1974/1974%20-%200173.PDF
 
Why Sikorsky didn't use the Rotoprop system tested for S-61 by later helicopters.
 

Attachments

  • 61F.jpg
    61F.jpg
    45.5 KB · Views: 408
Back in 1974, China May have been negotiating to build S-61s, but they never built any Sikorskys. Instead China bought licenses to build several French helicopters: Dauphin, Super Frelon, etc.
 
Yes, the Westland Commando always looked odd as a troop-carrier! The sill of the cargo door is waist-high on Akan standing beside it! How did fully-equipped Royal Marine Commandos climb on board? Consider that during the Afghan War, RMC wore 70 pounds of a armour, plus weapons, plus ammunition, plus water, etc. for one-day foot patrols!
 
mil said:
Why Sikorsky didn't use the Rotoprop system tested for S-61 by later helicopters.

That system to my opinion was just a swivelling tail rotor, still using the same drivetrain,
as the conventional tail rotor. So it would have been limited to a relatively low power,
definitely not comparable to the pusher prop à la X2. And in the hover and when flying
at lower speeds, it still would have needed the tail rotor. And a swivelling gear for
really high power output in the extreme tail probably would be a heavy in a position,
where it shouldn't be.
 
The West German Navy bought 21 S-61s for search and rescue. I suspect that they bought them from Westland.
Meanwhile, the West German Army bought (twin-engined) Sikorsky CH-53s to haul soldiers. Some German CH-53s hauled NATO soldiers during recent fighting in Afghanistan.
 
riggerrob said:
The West German Navy bought 21 S-61s for search and rescue. I suspect that they bought them from Westland.

Yes, the German Sea Kings were Westland Sea King Mk. 41 models. There were actually 22 ordered initially.
 
Sikorsky S.61N (with short fuselage ?) in BEA. markings, manufacturers display model
 

Attachments

  • beasss.jpg
    beasss.jpg
    39.7 KB · Views: 158
  • beaddd.jpg
    beaddd.jpg
    149.3 KB · Views: 134
Last edited:
Dear Tsr Joe,
Your photo looks like the standard S-61 fuselage length.
Sikorsky built S-61L to carry passengers. Most worked hauling crews to off-shore oil rigs. They were eventually replaced by Super Pumas and now by Sikorsky S-92.
All the extra length is in the forward fuselage between the engines and cockpit.
Ironically, a few S-61L have had the fuselage extension removed o reduce weight as they are now working at heli-logging.
 
They probably just painted up a standard Sea King model for promotional purposes, perhaps they didn't have any correct S.61N promotional models at the time?
 
Sikorsky S.61N mockup, note rotor hub fairing (also displayed at LeBourget, 1959) http://1000aircraftphotos.com/PRPhotos/SikorskyS-61.htm
& retouched image in BEA. markings for press release (Aeroplane, May 1963)

I would appreciate any thoughts as to the colour scheme of the mockup ? a tinplate toy of the period suggests orange and blue cheatline ?

cheers, Joe
 

Attachments

  • SikorskyS-61.jpg
    SikorskyS-61.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 76
  • s-l1600dfg.jpg
    s-l1600dfg.jpg
    157.9 KB · Views: 87
  • FB_IMG_1681800254680.jpg
    FB_IMG_1681800254680.jpg
    67 KB · Views: 31
Last edited:
There is a January 1960 reference to a triple-Gnome engined S-61 proposal; that shadows a Sikorsky offering for a triple-T58 installation for hot-and-high.
That makes a lot of sense and I would think it's viability in 'hot and high-altitude operations' would have made the design much more successful on the world market.


Regards
Pioneer
 
Agusta AS-61N-1 Silver: 1982, S-61N shortened by "about 4ft", fuel increased to 766 gallons, seating for 24 in offshore config . First flight 25 July 1984. Originally planned to replace T58s with CT7s but Alfa Romeo did not complete the work required to modify the CT7. Two built, cns 6401 and 6402; the latter became M39-02 with Royal Malaysian Air Force.

Helipro S-61 'Shortsky': 1995, S-61L/N shortened by 1.27m ahead of intakes. Sponsons removed, payload increased by 450kg. Six converted for VH Logging and Canadian Helicopters. First flight February 1996 as N301Y.

Helipro S-61 Offshore Short: 1999, S-61N shortened as per the Shortsky but sponsons retained. One conversion completed by Rotor-Dyne Systems of British Columbia. First flight 12 February 1999.

Carson S-61T Triton: 2008, SH-3D ( 12 ) and S-61N ( 7 ) re-lifed by Sikorsky and modified with modular wiring looms, Cobham avionics & glass cockpit and composite rotor blades.
 

Attachments

  • Agusta_Silver_AvWeek_19820628_087.JPEG
    Agusta_Silver_AvWeek_19820628_087.JPEG
    327.8 KB · Views: 43
  • Helipro_Shortsky_N301Y.jpeg
    Helipro_Shortsky_N301Y.jpeg
    49.3 KB · Views: 48
Agusta AS.61 N1, manufacturers display model, IHM. Weston-super-Mare
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1681799346581.jpg
    FB_IMG_1681799346581.jpg
    55 KB · Views: 41
Last edited:
Westland/Sikorsky WS.61N Wiltshire, manufacturers display model, IHM. Weston-super-Mare, 2017
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1681799624708.jpg
    FB_IMG_1681799624708.jpg
    69.4 KB · Views: 41
  • FB_IMG_1681799627893.jpg
    FB_IMG_1681799627893.jpg
    50.9 KB · Views: 34
  • FB_IMG_1681799637289.jpg
    FB_IMG_1681799637289.jpg
    53.5 KB · Views: 29
  • FB_IMG_1681799648117.jpg
    FB_IMG_1681799648117.jpg
    51.6 KB · Views: 36
Westland/Sikorsky WS.61N Wiltshire .. ref. Westland Sea King, Lee Howard, Haynes Publishing, 2014
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1681799587903.jpg
    FB_IMG_1681799587903.jpg
    37 KB · Views: 48
  • FB_IMG_1681799579836.jpg
    FB_IMG_1681799579836.jpg
    45.4 KB · Views: 68

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom