It was fast...
https://en.defence-ua.com/news/taur..._aircraft_completed_in_record_time-19893.html

View: https://x.com/MBDADeutschland/status/2102694308826546345?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2102694308826546345%7Ctwgr%5Ea7ce4a7243f1bbd9c480f19c385484bc54512371%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.defence-ua.com%2Fconsole%2Faddarticles%2F


"From Defense Express we would like to note that, according to initial plans announced in 2025, the integration on the JAS 39C/D was not expected to be completed before 2028, whereas it is now scheduled for the second half of September 2026. In other words, the work was completed more than a year earlier than originally planned."

"It should be noted that, despite the involvement of Swedish company Saab in its development, none of the countries operating the Gripen currently uses the Taurus. Therefore, the main advantage at this time is the ability for European countries to share their stocks of Taurus missiles, as well as the previously mentioned possibility of supplying them to Ukraine."
 
Weren't they supposed to have integrated the Taurus years ago, according to their then marketing placards? Then how can something that was not done in time be accounted as achieved earlier than planned?!
An other claim confirming that Gripen, for sure, has outfought... Modesty.
 
Weren't they supposed to have integrated the Taurus years ago, according to their then marketing placards? Then how can something that was not done in time be accounted as achieved earlier than planned?!
An other claim confirming that Gripen, for sure, has outfought... Modesty.
No, only now. And Eurofighter doesn't have thos integration yet.
Until now, it was only on Tornado and on F-15K (though a very underwhelming one).
 
Weren't they supposed to have integrated the Taurus years ago, according to their then marketing placards? Then how can something that was not done in time be accounted as achieved earlier than planned?!
Well, as said, nobody of the actual Gripen users uses the Taurus missile, so there was no pressure from customer side. This integration happened very probably because next year the Gripen will go to war in Ukraina.
https://voennoedelo.com/en/posts/id16486-gripen-jets-could-expand-ukraine-strike-reach-into-russia
 
Last edited:
Weren't they supposed to have integrated the Taurus years ago, according to their then marketing placards? Then how can something that was not done in time be accounted as achieved earlier than planned?!
An other claim confirming that Gripen, for sure, has outfought... Modesty.
Taurus was developed partially by Saab Bofors Dynamics. Its existence on marketing placards was probably therefore partially to sell Taurus, not Gripen. With regards to its implementation, the combination of Saabs/Bofors involvement and the fact that Taurus shared at least some DNA with the DWS-39/BK90, which is a similar brick already certified on the Gripen. That probably made it so that they knew what to expect. Add some pessimistic hedging and you get something way ahead of schedule.
 
And Germany doesn't even look at the Gripen nor is Germany giving away Taurus.
Germany has ordered 600 Taurus NEO for use on Eurofighter. If Taurus NEO is intended as a replacement for 'old´ Taurus, German 'old' Taurus will be superfluous to German requirements. If I have understood correctly, half of 600 German Taurus inventory is operationally ready.
Gripen with 'old' Taurus in Ukrainian service? Never say never.
the only operator of both will be Sweden, in a couple years.
Can I borrow your crystal ball?
 
And Germany doesn't even look at the Gripen nor is Germany giving away Taurus.

As I said, the only operator of both will be Sweden, in a couple years.
And Ukraina... :)

It is cheaper to send old ammunition to be exploded somewhere in Russia than recycling it according absurdly stringent european regulations... ;)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom