And into economics and ownership rights.

Outside of the US, 'eminent domain' is usually known as expropriation or compulsory acquisition. In New Zealand, compulsorily acquiring private land falls under the Resource Management Act (RMA). And it follows a bureaucratic process.

Kiwi landowners faced with compulsory acquisition [1] have the right to full market value of their land as well as disturbance payments and/or compensation for any resulting business losses, increased mortgage payments on replacement properties, etc.

Base housing isn't directly related to the Mogami class but it does beg the questions of whether bases market housing should have been allowed around bases and whether existing bases in built-up areas should be retained. Compared to funding new bases, procuring a few Mogami class will look like a bargain ... :eek:

______________________________________________________________

[1] AFAIK, compulsory acquisition under the RMA assumes the actual use of acquired properties ... not just holding on to lands that might be handy in future. Indeed, if the land is not repurposed immediately, resident owners have the right to stay on the property until its use is reallocated. Point being, it is a potentially messy process that dictates careful planning and scrupulous execution.
Compulsorily aquiring land for base housing would not meet the requirements, so would definitely be contested in the courts. Moving the base away from the main population centre probably makes it dificult to recruit the sort of technical skills they need.

Anyway, back to topic...
 
Not much choice though given the decision to take the ships as close to Japanese configuration as possible. The rest of the RAN fleet use the LM2500 although the Hunters will also use the MT30 so the LM2500s will end up being the orphans, in the RAN fleet at least.
I fully expect that the MT30s will replace the LM2500s, either in midlife refits or as new classes come online.
 
I fully expect that the MT30s will replace the LM2500s, either in midlife refits or as new classes come online.
New build seems likely but it would be an unusual decision to replace the LM2500 with an MT30 for an in-service vessel at a mid-life refit... The Canberra class for example uses a single LM2500 with power and size significantly below the MT30 and I suspect the Hobart class with two LM2500s wouldn't see a swap to a single MT30 either.
 
New build seems likely but it would be an unusual decision to replace the LM2500 with an MT30 for an in-service vessel at a mid-life refit... The Canberra class for example uses a single LM2500 with power and size significantly below the MT30 and I suspect the Hobart class with two LM2500s wouldn't see a swap to a single MT30 either.
No, I'd expect a 1-for-1 replacement, with the extra power going into generators.
 
While having surplus power on Australian warships would be a significant advantage in future weapon deployment,
but it remains questionable whether it would be worthwhile for large-scale refits, given the challenges of the international shipping(ship mean ship, Is it right my translation?) supply chain.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom