dickie

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
3 May 2007
Messages
46
Reaction score
8
Noted in a few sources that these were the intended powerplants for the Convair KINGFISH, but I thought that the requirements put forth for the program included the use of the J58? Can anyone clear this up for me or provide a source of information on these engines?

Much thanks!
 
What I have gleaned from the limited information available:

RJ59 was likely the designation for the pure ramjets for the proposed Convair FISH parasite, NOT the KINGFISH. Sources identifying it as the powerplant for the later plane are probably mistaken.

Information regarding these engines has proven difficult to unearth; either because they never made it past the design/designation phase and development was canceled along with the Super Hustler/Fish, or because the information is classified as it relates to further developments...
 
Hello,

Some time ago I have read an AIAA paper entitled: "HISTORY OF RAMJET PROPULSION DEVELOPMENT AT THE MARQUARDT COMPANY – 1944 TO 1970" written by Mr. Carl Stechman and Mr. Robert Allen (http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/CDReadyMJPC2005_1177/PV2005_3538.pdf).

Besides some information on XRJ59-MA-1 and XRJ59-MA-3 engines (flight tested on the X-7) there is also a short description (and a picture) of the MA-24XEA engine (1958-1959):

"[...] configured for internal mounting with a vehicle-provided inlet system, was designed for extended cruise at Mach 4 and 90,000 ft. The engine accelerated the vehicle from a Mach 2, 40,000 ft. takeover condition. [...] The variable convergent- divergent exit nozzle [...] was designed with a nonprotuberant aft-end geometry for a low radar signature during cruise flight. The operational development activity for the MA24-XEA was suspended when the launch aircraft program was abruptly terminated."

My question is, is it possible that the MA-24XEA was being developed for the FISH vehicle (or some of the Lockheed's early designs)? According to Mr. Pedlow's and Mr. Welzenbach's book -- "The CIA and Overhead Reconnaissance: The U–2 and OXCART Programs, 1954–1974"; available from http://www.foia.ucia.gov/ -- the FISH would cruise at conditions similar to the operational envelope of MA-24XEA: Mach > 4.0 and 90,000 ft. Also, the launch platform for the FISH (the B-58B) was terminated in June 1959.
 
If you note the image posted by Scott above you will see MA24 and RJ-59 are the same engine family MA24 is the internal company designation, where RJ-59 is the official designation. Its already well known that RJ-59 was intended for the FISH.
 
Just dug this up .....print is small in the side-by-side, so I opened them as single pages so this short piece might be made more legible. , Kevin
 

Attachments

  • ramjetpopsci.PNG
    ramjetpopsci.PNG
    466.3 KB · Views: 111
  • ramjetpage1.PNG
    ramjetpage1.PNG
    540.2 KB · Views: 95
  • ramjetpage2.PNG
    ramjetpage2.PNG
    678 KB · Views: 103
If you note the image posted by Scott above you will see MA24 and RJ-59 are the same engine family MA24 is the internal company designation, where RJ-59 is the official designation. Its already well known that RJ-59 was intended for the FISH.

What's more, the same RJ59 / MA-24-XAE was the engine that propelled a Lockheed X-7A-3 to Mach 4.31 on April 17, 1958. Source: Tom Heppenheimer, Facing the heat barrier.


That flight is long forgotten, yet (with perhaps the French Stataltex which aparently hit Mach 4.86 sometimes between 1960 and 1964) they set airbreathing velocity records for subsonic combustion ramjets; that hold until the renewed interest in scramjets in the 1990's.

So FISH was the application of that X-7 velocity record to a spyplane, in 1958. Four years later it was reborn as ISINGLASS, same performance envelope (Mach 4+ and also 100 000 ft + ).


XRJ59-MA-1 (1955 –1957)
This 17 foot-long, 36-in. diameter Mach 3.0 ramjet was Marquardt’s first flight-type supersonic ramjet with a
conical flameholder. The design was development only, and was sized for future interceptor missiles and ASM
systems. Following an initial flight failure, three engines successfully powered the X-7 flight test vehicle six times,
with one of the engines flying three times.

XRJ59-MA-3 (1958-1959)
This advanced Mach 4 design (Fig.18), similar to the XRJ59-MA-1, except for a higher temperature structure and a modified inlet diffuser, demonstrated the ramjet speed capability by driving the X-7 vehicle to Mach 4.31 – nearly 3000 miles per hour.
This engine weighed 1050 pounds and was 17 feet in length. Two of these flight engines were flown on the X-7 vehicle.
Also, long endurance capabilities were demonstrated by means of a continuous 32.5 hr. ground test run equivalent to flight
three times around the World at high supersonic speeds.

(Picture also from @Orionblamblam )

ma24-xea-1-744x1024.gif
 
Last edited:

Configuration 121 Report​


A highly detailed system description was prepared by Convair at this point in the configuration evolution. Dated 3 March 1958, the report consisted of seven large individually bound volumes: a summary of the weapon system; design features and structure; aerodynamics; stability and control; navigation, weapon delivery, reconnaissance, and decoy; propulsion and thermodynamics; and operation and ground support.

The introduction listed six design requirements for the aircraft: Mach 4 to 6 cruise capability; 5,000 nautical mile operating radius; 1961–1963 operational time frame; Class C warhead delivery (weapon load for the aircraft was listed as 3,400 pounds); two-man, side-by-side crew; and minimum size to fit the B-58 and to allow mobile launching and economy of production.

The manned stage was forty-seven feet long with a D-shaped cross section forty-five inches high and sixty-four inches wide. The gross weight for the manned stage was 20,190 pounds. The aircraft weighed 9,120 pounds empty.

The two-person crew sat side by side. The forward section of the manned stage contained an electronics bay and a nose gear. The forward section also contained a movable nose used for trim. The nose could be retracted when it was on the B-58. The aft fuselage of the manned section contained an equipment bay, fuel tank, ramjet engine, turbojet engine, and landing skids. The GE J85 turbojet engine, used for landing, was installed in the lower aft section ahead of the Marquardt MA24F ramjet engine. Fuel could be transferred between stages for balancing the aircraft in flight.

The manned stage retained the twenty-degree pivoting nose for landing. The hydraulic actuator lowered the forward section for approaches and landings. The actuator also functioned as shock absorber for landings.

The two-man crew consisted of a pilot and a bombardier/navigator. The crew stations had dual flight controls. Seating position was reclined forty-five degrees to minimize the height of the compartment. The glass portion of the cockpit enclosure was shielded with metal covers during high-speed flight. Indirect vision was provided by a closed circuit television system.

The expendable stage was almost forty-nine feet long with a maximum diameter of forty-six inches. Gross weight for the expendable stage was 25,700 pounds. Empty weight was 7,400 pounds.

The forward section of the expendable stage contained a fuel tank and a warhead bay with stabilizing skirts that would be opened when the warhead was released from the rest of the expendable section. The aft section contained another fuel tank, a top-mounted wing, and two Marquardt MA24F ramjet engines snuggled beneath the wing adjacent to the body.


Like the Super Hustler, this early version of FISH had a nose tip that hinged downward and tucked below the fuselage to deal with the space limitations of the B-58 carrier. (The nose could be swung up after the landing gear of the B-58 was retracted.) The aircraft was powered by two Marquardt MA24E ramjet engines with 41.5-inch diameter variable-geometry exit nozzles. A Pratt & Whitney JT12 series turbojet engine was nestled between and just in front of the ramjets. A bifurcated intake on the lower side fed both ramjets and the turbojet.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom