Energia - Buran Space Transportation System

A mockup of a project for an autonomous «Technological Production Module» was seen in the Khrunichev Center's Museum.
This module had an orbital mass of 88 tons, of which 25 tons were technological equipment and consumables, with an electrical power supply capacity of up to 57 kW, visited by Buran 1-2 times a year (apparently, judging by the APAS docking units).

5395511580399101802-enhance-2x.jpg

5395511580399101803-enhance-2x.jpg

5395511580399101804-enhance-2x.jpg

5395511580399101805-enhance-2x.jpg

5397901961627564502-enhance-2x.jpg

5397901961627564503.jpg

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
A mockup of a project for an autonomous «Technological Production Module» was seen in the Khrunichev Center's Museum.
This module had an orbital mass of 88 tons, of which 25 tons were technological equipment and consumables, with an electrical power supply capacity of up to 57 kW, visited by Buran 1-2 times a year (apparently, judging by the APAS docking units).

More information and images about this module in this link. The note is in Spanish, but it can be translated almost perfectly.

Captura-de-pantalla-2015-06-10-a-las-20.11.03-enhance-2x.jpg

Captura-de-pantalla-2015-06-10-a-las-19.50.33-enhance-2x.jpg

Captura-de-pantalla-2015-06-10-a-las-20.10.46-enhance-2x.jpg

:rolleyes:
 
Amy Shira Teitel from Vintage Space posted this video eight years ago about the Buran:


After NASA announced its space shuttle program, the Soviet Union responded with its own, nearly identical version. The Soviet Buran space shuttle and NASA's own shuttle look pretty similar, in large part because the Soviet version copied the American one. But why? And why didn't the Soviet shuttle program take off like the American one did?
For more on Buran and the shuttle program that barely got off the ground, check out the latest post on VintageSpace: http://www.popsci.com/why-soviet-spac...
 
The Buran and its people

Ivan Andreevich Bychkov was an outstanding and decorated Soviet military officer, with 30 years of service in the military space forces of the former USSR. In the last years of his service he was the head of the military representative office at the Baikonur Cosmodrome, which controlled the quality of assembly, ground and full-scale tests of the reusable Buran spacecraft and side blocks of the Energia launch vehicle.

i.-bichkov.jpg

3beg-large-enhance-2x-faceai.jpg

bichkov.jpg
 
You was asking about production onboard TPM which never was a payload for Buran. Planned nomenclature is listed at the last picture at @Willythekid post on TPM.
Meh, Buran or Energia, it doesn't change what I said. It was to be launched by the Buran's launch vehicle and to be serviced by Buran. And the article is about recent launch systems.
 
Hi All,
I am interested in the number 3 design in the chart a shuttle based on the BOR/spiral data collected.
Anyone have the stats for a shuttle based on the BOR test bed.
 

Attachments

  • Energia-Buran evolution.jpg
    Energia-Buran evolution.jpg
    884 KB · Views: 24
  • ura_110.jpg
    ura_110.jpg
    116.2 KB · Views: 21
  • ura_118.jpg
    ura_118.jpg
    159.9 KB · Views: 15
Hi All,
I am interested in the number 3 design in the chart a shuttle based on the BOR/spiral data collected.
Anyone have the stats for a shuttle based on the BOR test bed.

Hello! The following link may help you find what you are looking for.


The note is in Russian, but it can be easily translated into English.

As an example, I have translated a part of the text:

"But that's not all - after the first launch of the Energia LV on May 15, 1987, it became clear to foreign observers that the Uragan could be "created" not only for the Zenit LV, but also for the Energia LV, and therefore have much larger dimensions and mass. This point of view was clearly demonstrated by the Buran strike version with maneuvering warheads. Drawing by Andrey Makhankonemetsky magazine (GDR) "Freie Welt" in December 1987 (the author of the rightmost drawing and article is Klaus Huhndorf), having published the supposed appearance of the hypothetical reusable space system "Energia-Uragan". The most interesting thing is that our orbital ship "Buran" could have actually been exactly as the German artist imagined it, if the Council of Chief Designers headed by V.P. Glushko had accepted G.E. Lozino-Lozinsky's proposal at their meeting on June 11, 1975, to use as the basis for the Soviet reusable spacecraft the "305-1" project, which was being developed on the basis of the "Spiral" orbital aircraft (and, accordingly, "BORa-4") with the "lifting body" layout at the Molniya Scientific and Production Association (and the Myasishchev EMZ).

We will add that the concerns of the US Department of Defense were not in vain - on the basis of "BORa-4" maneuvering combat units of space basing were being developed, the main task of which was to bomb America from space with a minimum flight time to targets (5...7 minutes)"


778px16ep15b1-2-enhance-2x.jpg
 
Last edited:
I thought that was an artist's conception from Der Spiegel...

At any rate--with main engines under the Energiya core...were there other winged test articles to go in Buran's place?

A waverider or other test object released from AN-225 for low speed tests...
 
The Museum Complex of Verkhnyaya Pyshma (Sverdlovsk Oblast) has started restoring the legendary Buran #3 or Izdeliye 2.01. In a year's time, it will become part of a large-scale exposition about Soviet cosmonautics.

✔ The hull is being scanned to recreate lost parts: engines, fairings and glazing.

✔ Drawings from the 1980s have been partially lost - restorers are working with archival data.

✔ A separate pavilion is being built for Buran with exhibits of the Energia-Buran program.

bur-scan-01.jpg

bur-scan-02.jpg

bur-scan-03.jpg

bur-scan-04.jpg

bur-scan-05.jpg

bur-scan-06.jpg

bur-scan-07.jpg
 
You have to really admire the Soviet re use of things for different purposes. That ADI is also used in Su-33, and modernized variants of IL-95, Su-27/30 and MiG-29.

The intake devices indicator of MiG-29/Su-27 is re used here. Radar altimeter is used in MiG-29 and Ka-27.

HSI is extremely common and from MiG-29/Su-27/30/33 and Ka-27 family/Ka-50.

Landing gear indicator looks identical to Su-27.

I’m sure those temperature gauges are from Su-27 and others. VVI are in many platforms as well I bet. I’m sure I’m missing many and have some wrong along specific models.

I’m sure many people would look down on this as cobbled together, but to me it says practicality and the ability to easily train both pilots and technicians for it.
 
Last edited:
You have to really admire the Soviet re use of things for different purposes. That ADI is also used in Su-33, and modernized variants of IL-95, Su-27/30 and MiG-29.

The intake devices indicator of MiG-29/Su-27 is re used here. Radar altimeter is used in MiG-29 and Ka-27.

HSI is extremely common and from MiG-29/Su-27/30/33 and Ka-27 family/Ka-50.

Landing gear indicator looks identical to Su-27.

I’m sure things like those temperature gauges, VVI are in many platforms as well. I’m sure I’m missing many and have some wrong along specific models.

I’m sure many people would look down on this as cobbled together, but to me it says practicality and the ability to easily train both pilots and technicians for it.

You can read about this in the excellent blog "Eureka":

"The operational cockpit of the Buran was quite advanced for the time, although its design was still relatively conservative and used many standard instruments in Soviet aviation at the time. The central panel was dominated by three cathode ray displays (VKU) to represent data from the on-board computer, which together with the fly-by-wire, made this aircraft a dream come true for Soviet pilots.

Although the Buran's cockpit may seem outdated by today's standards, it was not much different from the original American shuttle controls".
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom