Defense against Hypersonic Glide Vehicles

AN/AWW-14(V)

ACCESS: Granted
Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2019
Messages
476
Reaction score
971
The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) has awarded Other Transactional (OT) Agreements to Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon Missiles and Defense to complete an accelerated concept design of the Glide Phase Interceptor (GPI) for MDA’s regional hypersonic missile defense program. Interceptors will be fired from Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense destroyers using the standard Vertical Launch System (VLS) and will also integrate with the modified Baseline 9 Aegis Weapon System to detect, track, control, and engage hypersonic threats in the glide phase of the missile’s flight.

LM proposes navalized PAC-3 MSE https://insidedefense.com/daily-new...al-sea-based-pac-3-counter-hypersonic-threats
Raytheon can be provide new or existing design as Standard Missile or David Sling
and finally Northrop Grumman design is all new, probably
 
Last edited:

jsport

what do you know about surfing Major? you're from-
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
3,746
Reaction score
1,429
The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) has awarded Other Transactional (OT) Agreements to Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon Missiles and Defense to complete an accelerated concept design of the Glide Phase Interceptor (GPI) for MDA’s regional hypersonic missile defense program. Interceptors will be fired from Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense destroyers using the standard Vertical Launch System (VLS) and will also integrate with the modified Baseline 9 Aegis Weapon System to detect, track, control, and engage hypersonic threats in the glide phase of the missile’s flight.

LM proposes navalized PAC-3 MSE https://insidedefense.com/daily-new...al-sea-based-pac-3-counter-hypersonic-threats
Raytheon can be provide new or existing design as Standard Missile or David Sling
and finally Northrop Grumman design is all new, probably
An optional defensive/offensive air breathing ASALM derivative upgrade or PAC 3 under mach 5 missiles which are able to strike or defend makes more sense than only 12xCPS on a ship. Mass production to face such overwhelming threats both defensively and offensively is necessary. Congress is still correct in doubting USN strategy on these monsterous and monsterouly expensive one shot wonder Mach 5s..
 

Josh_TN

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
1,195
Reaction score
800
The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) has awarded Other Transactional (OT) Agreements to Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon Missiles and Defense to complete an accelerated concept design of the Glide Phase Interceptor (GPI) for MDA’s regional hypersonic missile defense program. Interceptors will be fired from Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense destroyers using the standard Vertical Launch System (VLS) and will also integrate with the modified Baseline 9 Aegis Weapon System to detect, track, control, and engage hypersonic threats in the glide phase of the missile’s flight.

LM proposes navalized PAC-3 MSE https://insidedefense.com/daily-new...al-sea-based-pac-3-counter-hypersonic-threats
Raytheon can be provide new or existing design as Standard Missile or David Sling
and finally Northrop Grumman design is all new, probably
An optional defensive/offensive air breathing ASALM derivative upgrade or PAC 3 under mach 5 missiles which are able to strike or defend makes more sense than only 12xCPS on a ship. Mass production to face such overwhelming threats both defensively and offensively is necessary. Congress is still correct in doubting USN strategy on these monsterous and monsterouly expensive one shot wonder Mach 5s..

Well the Chinese seem to think they will work well enough. I think the future will be air launched weapons of much cheaper cost, but throwing a warhead two thousand miles is thirty minutes is always going to have some uses, even if its pricy. I think there's room for both. There isn't always a plane overhead when you want something dead. I definitely agree tearing open the Zoomies is pointless; there should be a low cost auxillary platform with plenty of hull space for more weapons and lower costs with larger numbers than those three orphaned hulls.
 

Firefinder

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Oct 6, 2019
Messages
217
Reaction score
331
definitely agree tearing open the Zoomies is pointless; there should be a low cost auxillary platform with plenty of hull space for more weapons and lower costs with larger numbers than those three orphaned hulls.
Counterpoint.

The Navy is LOVING the Zumwalt hull. It large roomy, great seakeeping, solid crew quarters, lots of power...

I can see this as part of a way to get more of them made and avoided the standard you need to have a competition laws to order a big ticket idea like a ship.

A Zumwalt hull with the CPS tubes built in should be able to carry far more.
 

Forest Green

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
810
Reaction score
601
 

uk 75

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
3,821
Reaction score
2,866
Assuming the target of a Mach 5 weapon is a US aircraft carrier, then a Zumwalt based Area Defence ship seems to make sense as an escort.
I have been re reading the USN War College wargames about the Cold War in the 80s and note that most US carriers eventually got sunk or seriously damaged in a full on war.
A sneak attack by Mach 5 weapons on the Minuteman silos would be pointless as the US Trident force has enough weapons to annihilate China in return.
Anti Missile systems tend to lead to arms control treaties as a cheaper solution.
 

Josh_TN

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
1,195
Reaction score
800
definitely agree tearing open the Zoomies is pointless; there should be a low cost auxillary platform with plenty of hull space for more weapons and lower costs with larger numbers than those three orphaned hulls.
Counterpoint.

The Navy is LOVING the Zumwalt hull. It large roomy, great seakeeping, solid crew quarters, lots of power...

I can see this as part of a way to get more of them made and avoided the standard you need to have a competition laws to order a big ticket idea like a ship.

A Zumwalt hull with the CPS tubes built in should be able to carry far more.
If they love it she much why isn’t it the new large combatant?
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
14,732
Reaction score
3,699
You know just from look at the title and a quick skimming...

Replace China with Soviet and we back in fucking 1960-70s.
Reality can be a bitch like that.
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
14,732
Reaction score
3,699
definitely agree tearing open the Zoomies is pointless; there should be a low cost auxillary platform with plenty of hull space for more weapons and lower costs with larger numbers than those three orphaned hulls.
Counterpoint.

The Navy is LOVING the Zumwalt hull. It large roomy, great seakeeping, solid crew quarters, lots of power...

I can see this as part of a way to get more of them made and avoided the standard you need to have a competition laws to order a big ticket idea like a ship.

A Zumwalt hull with the CPS tubes built in should be able to carry far more.
If they love it she much why isn’t it the new large combatant?
Because you can't fix stupid. Why do we only have 180 F-22s & 20 B-2s?
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
14,732
Reaction score
3,699
A sneak attack by Mach 5 weapons on the Minuteman silos would be pointless as the US Trident force has enough weapons to annihilate China in return.
Mach 5 isn't fast enough. MM can be gone on 30 seconds notice. To your later point I would add, "for now". When (not if) they figure out how to spot submarines from satellites killing SSBNs will be like shooting fish in a barrel.
 

Firefinder

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Oct 6, 2019
Messages
217
Reaction score
331
If they love it she much why isn’t it the new large combatant?
Because it does not work like that thanks to Congress.

There is like three different sets laws that basically say...

The DOD must put out a request the the Companies need to compete for with the DOD choosing the the one they most like.

The Navy can not go to Ingells and say, Hey I want 40 more Zumwalts hulls, heres money start building. No they have to have Ingells, Newport, Mobile and any other boat builter to included their design bid. Then run an extensive think tank program to choose the best for their needs.

All while congress is breathing down their necks.

Especially since the Zumwalt is disliked by Congress still, who holds the money bag and are famously... Stupid with weapon programs.

But by showing that the Zumwalts have uses and since they are already built. The navy can use the same loophole that they did to get the Burke 3s or FA18s built by saying it be cheaper to make a modification of an existing design instead of jumping thru the hoops to get a new one.
 

Forest Green

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
810
Reaction score
601
Mach 5 isn't fast enough. MM can be gone on 30 seconds notice. To your later point I would add, "for now". When (not if) they figure out how to spot submarines from satellites killing SSBNs will be like shooting fish in a barrel.
That would be extremely difficult since only ELF waves travel more than a few feet underwater and an ELF radar would be about the width of a small country, unless they can figure out how to create a virtual radar from many separate satellites.
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
14,732
Reaction score
3,699
Mach 5 isn't fast enough. MM can be gone on 30 seconds notice. To your later point I would add, "for now". When (not if) they figure out how to spot submarines from satellites killing SSBNs will be like shooting fish in a barrel.
That would be extremely difficult since only ELF waves travel more than a few feet underwater and an ELF radar would be about the width of a small country, unless they can figure out how to create a virtual radar from many separate satellites.
That's the thing with military technology. It's always the things you don't see coming that bite you in the ass.
 

aonestudio

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
675
Reaction score
1,370

The Missile Defense Agency awarded Lockheed Martin a $20.9 million contract to begin developing a concept design for the Glide Phase Interceptor (GPI), a defense program meant to defeat hypersonic missiles that travel five times the speed of sound.

“GPI leverages our proven success in developing and fielding the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, weapon system. This, combined with our Aegis weapon system expertise and knowledge, affords us the unique capability to support the hypersonic threat defense for MDA,” said Julie Pecson, program director of the Glide Phase Interceptor program at Lockheed Martin.

The MDA shared that interceptors will be fired from Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense destroyers using the standard Vertical Launch System and will also integrate with the modified Baseline 9 Aegis Weapon System to detect, track, control, and engage hypersonic threats in the glide phase of the missile’s flight.
 

Similar threads

Top