• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Boeing-Sikorsky SB>1 Defiant (Model S-100)

Sundog

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,700
Reaction score
146
Apparently they're still afraid to raise the landing gear.
It doesn't have anything to do with fear. It has to do with the how the test flight program is mapped out and they obviously don't need to retract the gear to fly at 100 knots.

Having said that, given the bullet proof nature of V-280 testing so far, I think Bell is already the winner of the Blackhawk replacement. I think the SB-1 is now just a development program for whichever program comes after.
 

yasotay

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
253
@ Sundog - to your point on V-280, I suspect that Bell will start on the "operational" issues, since the air vehicle seems not to have any issues with flying. Things like: "our aircraft has only six rotor blades, all of which can fit in the back of a small tactical vehicle. We can work on the engines from the bed of a tactical vehicle. Our aircraft does not have a very high CG (think slope landing). Our aircraft can hang stuff out behind the aircraft like refueling hoses, LF radio antenna, decoys. We can put extra gas under the wings, other things too."

I agree that with the current situation the V-280 would be difficult to beat, but Bell better not rest on their laurels until they have a contract. I think part of the problem for Sikorsky-Boeing is that they thought they had the program in the bag since the Army would never do tilt rotors.
 

VTOLicious

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
603
Reaction score
181
"...
While the official JMR TD phase has ended, according to the Army, both Valor and Defiant continue to fly as each team works to drive down risk related to technology development that would ultimately help a possible program of record move more quickly down the road.
Even though the two demonstrators are in different places in their flight test plans, Maj. Gen. Thomas Todd, the program executive officer for Army aviation, said earlier this month that the service wasn’t planning to wait for each competitor to reach the same goal posts before proceeding. The only advantage a vendor might have in meeting timelines is that it is able to burn down risk in technology development, he added.
The Army is preparing to award an other transaction authority contract to begin a competitive demonstration and risk reduction, or CDRR, effort in March. An OTA is a type of contract that enables rapid prototyping. The CDRR will consist of two phases that last approximately one year each..."
https://www.defensenews.com/land/2020/01/17/defiant-exceeds-100-knots/
 

Attachments

Last edited:

yasotay

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
253
I believe they will get past 200 knots within the budget they have. Doubt they will get through a complete program to the depth that the V-280 did.
 

_Del_

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
388
Reaction score
24
Raider is still flying, too. They might be confident enough in the results from the combined test programs that it won't much matter -- the hard part may be instilling this confidence in the customer.

Neither the V-280 or Defiant is a prototype exactly, so there will be open questions on decision-making day in either directions. Just want to fill as many blanks in with real data as possible.
 

yasotay

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
253
It is true that LMCO could fund the continued program, if they wanted to. Think the "fighter company" may still be trying to figure out how to become a rotorcraft company as well. While both Raider and Defiant are coaxial compound rotorcraft, that does not mean that the dynamics size up well. I suspect LMCO is more comfortable with the Raider program right now.
 

VTOLicious

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
603
Reaction score
181
https://www.military.com/daily-news...-prototype-impresses-leaders-flight-demo.html
"...
Both the Defiant and Raider are designed to fly at speeds of more than 200 knots, but they flew at slower speeds during the demo. The Defiant hit 140 knots, while the Raider reached 180 knots...
"When we are flying at 130 knots in this machine, we are using less than 20% of the prop power and less than 30% of the engine power," said Bill Fell, senior experimental test pilot for the S-97 Raider and the Defiant."
 

Attachments

TomcatViP

Hellcat
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
213
Test pilots on Defiant said they love the rear pusher-prop, which is designed to provide revolutionary thrust, but are also comforted that it can take direct hits in combat without causing catastrophic failure to the aircraft.

"It's all self-contained back here; you can take significant combat damage back here, and if you lose the prop, you are still a 150-knot machine," Ed Henderscheid, former U.S. Army AH-64 Apache pilot and Boeing's lead test pilot for Defiant, told defense reporters recently.

Unlike a conventional tail rotor, the rear pusher prop is completely electric, he said.

"Not having hydraulics in the tail boom as a helicopter pilot is a huge deal," Henderscheid said. "I have had hydraulics failures where they were caused by a break in the hydraulic line ... and it's scary when you have to go to keep your tail rotor where you want it. Not having to worry about a leak ... or some mechanical failure -- that's a really, really comforting thought."

 

yasotay

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
253
Not surprising that the Boeing and Sikorsky test pilots really like their product.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
10,264
Reaction score
846
Why is my browser requesting on this page permission for player.vimeo.com to access virtual reality devices?
 

yasotay

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
253
I am sure that the SB>1 team will be moving quickly to get their aircraft past 200 knots and fully competitive. Suspect that Bell will do more autonomy work and perhaps some long distance flights at cruise speed.
 

TomcatViP

Hellcat
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
213
Self deploying mostly unmanned to Le Bourget will be cool to see (from the US to Brazil then crossing unmanned to Senegal and then up to Paris).
 

yasotay

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
253
Self deploying mostly unmanned to Le Bourget will be cool to see (from the US to Brazil then crossing unmanned to Senegal and then up to Paris).
That would be great to see, but I suspect the FAA and the Insurance Company would put the kibosh on that.
 
Top