- Joined
- Jun 3, 2011
- Messages
- 15,328
- Reaction score
- 4,623
Trident said:Yup, IIRC they even have certain parts made out of titanium rather than aluminium to enable that rating.
Is that Swiss-specific or C/D in general?
Trident said:Yup, IIRC they even have certain parts made out of titanium rather than aluminium to enable that rating.
Grey Havoc said:![]()
Justin Trudeau tells Donald Trump he will block Boeing contracts over Bombardier tariff row
Justin Trudeau, the Canadian Prime Minister, told President Donald Trump on Wednesday he would block his country’s armed forces from buying Boeing aircraft if the US presses ahead with plans to slap import tariffs of 300 percent on Bombardier aeroplanes.www.telegraph.co.uk
Among the upgrades included in this potential package: 50 Sidewinder AIM-9X Block II tactical missiles; 38 APG-79(V)4 active electronically scanned array radars; 38 APG-79(V)4 AESA radar A1 kits; 46 F/A-18A wide-band RADOMES; upgrades to the Advanced Distributed Combat Training System; and technical assistance to support the upgraded jets.
Amazing... Will Marines manned or Germany's SH deploy one day on the QE class?
Something like an M-31 expeditionary arresting gear system?Amazing... Will Marines manned or Germany's SH deploy one day on the QE class?
QE does not have and is not getting arresting gear, so no.
Unless the need arises, the QE class probably won't use an arrestor cable. That is, unless UK defence policy changes massively in the upcoming years, but it doesn't seem that that will happen. Even if she does get an arrestor cable, the Royal Navy would probably opt for something stealth, like the F-35C. The Royal Navy is satisfied with the STOVL F-35B as it is.Amazing... Will Marines manned or Germany's SH deploy one day on the QE class?
Something like an M-31 expeditionary arresting gear system?Amazing... Will Marines manned or Germany's SH deploy one day on the QE class?
QE does not have and is not getting arresting gear, so no.
legend has it that the truck still hasn't landed til this dayMemory lane . The one is the left was a USMC prototype.
I've looked for that Tomcat one many times over the years. Saw it in a book way back in the day and was starting to think I'd imagined it.Memory lane . The one is the left was a USMC prototype.
The interior of the nozzles features triangular fins like rows of shark teeth that significantly reduced jet engine noise in UC lab tests. The project is a collaboration between UC, the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory and Naval Air Station Patuxent River. This fall NAVAIR will test the UC designs and performance on F-18 Super Hornets, the tactical fighter plane used by the U.S. Marines and Navy.
"They’re simple attachments that change the behavior of the flow coming out of the engine with minimal effect on its performance,” Gutmark said.
UC’s lab tests showed the new nozzle could reduce engine noise by between 5 and 8 decibels. That might not seem like much. But unlike linear scales like a ruler where an inch is always an inch, decibels are measured in a logarithmic scale in which 20 decibels is tenfold louder noise.
The UK screwed up not making our carriers cat and trap. The Growler is a formidable and vital asset, as well as a mean as hell aircraft to try fight against.
I got talking to a Typhoon pilot who spent time on the aircraft and he marvelled about its ability to kill an aircraft dead in the air by electronics alone, then add insult to injury and shoot it down.
I recall reading that they recently decided against including the conformal tanks in the production Block III aircraft?Boeing delivers first Block III Super Hornets to the US Navy, DefenseNews yesterday
Do my eyes deceive me but the pic of the III does not appear to have the conformal fuel tanks, one of the major upgrades if not the major upgrade of III over II due to the F-18s limited combat range. (Wikipedia quotes combat range of F-18 E/F @ 390 nm vs A-6 @ 878 nm)
![]()
Boeing delivers first Block III Super Hornets to the US Navy
The Block III configuration of the Super Hornet will bring greater connectivity, computing power and survivability to the Navy's fourth-generation fighter jet.www.defensenews.com
they cut it. Ran into some technical problems during flight testing I think. No conformal tanks, and of course, conformal weapon bay was gutted a while back.Do my eyes deceive me but the pic of the III does not appear to have the conformal fuel tanks, one of the major upgrades if not the major upgrade of III over II due to the F-18s limited combat range. (Wikipedia quotes combat range of F-18 E/F @ 390 nm vs A-6 @ 878 nm)
Thanks, found the War Zone write up which confirms your comment the CFTs got canned, don't understand why Navy/Congress procuring the F-18 III's with its very limited combat range of 390 nm when it has the option of the F-35C with a combat radius on internal fuel of 670 nm, which still ~ 200 nm short of the A-6they cut it. Ran into some technical problems during flight testing I think. No conformal tanks, and of course, conformal weapon bay was gutted a while back.Do my eyes deceive me but the pic of the III does not appear to have the conformal fuel tanks, one of the major upgrades if not the major upgrade of III over II due to the F-18s limited combat range. (Wikipedia quotes combat range of F-18 E/F @ 390 nm vs A-6 @ 878 nm)
Maybe they were too busy negotiating with the French?Only surprise here has been how long it has taken given it has been nearly 4yrs since A46-311 was lost.
Though realistically the ADF's budget has been stretched in many different directions in the past several years. From M113 and ASLAV replacements, F-35s, their Abrams expansion, Apaches, Hunter Class, and now nuclear subs and cruise missiles.