Boeing B-52J / B-52 Re-Engining

[NMaude]

241 pages summarised: does it have New START fins Y/N.

New START fin? well they could always reintroduce the original tall tail-fin, I never liked the new fin introduced on the B-52G. It, to me, looked like someone had got a giant pair of hedge-clippers and snipped off the tip of the tail-fin.

 

[BlackBat242]

New START fin? well they could always reintroduce the original tall tail-fin, I never liked the new fin introduced on the B-52G. It, to me, looked like someone had got a giant pair of hedge-clippers and snipped off the tip of the tail-fin.

The tall tail actually was less safe than the shorter one (in a reversal of normal experience).
It was easier to damage in sudden maneuvering or rough air, and the extra area didn't contribute anything to yaw prevention, directional stability, etc.

 

[Forest Green]

B-52 Emerges In Striking Retro Orange Paint Scheme

The jet was painted to pay homage to the days when earlier B-52 variants served as test motherships for X-15 rocket planes.

www.twz.com

 

[mkellytx]

B-52 Emerges In Striking Retro Orange Paint Scheme

The jet was painted to pay homage to the days when earlier B-52 variants served as test motherships for X-15 rocket planes.

www.twz.com

View attachment 742725

LOL, the DT guys (and gals) out at ED should have done this, not the OT guys out of Barkatraz. Shame on my old squadron...

 

[aim9xray]

Ha! Always heard it referred to as Barksport. Never visited; almost got there and then turned right to go to the Base in the middle of "L". Spent a year there one month dodging pine trucks. Got to see one or two unique catastrophic TF34 failures there.

 

[Scott Kenny]

Ha! Always heard it referred to as Barksport. Never visited; almost got there and then turned right to go to the Base in the middle of "L". Spent a year there one month dodging pine trucks.

Ah, yeah, loggers be crazy, yo.

Got to see one or two unique catastrophic TF34 failures there.

Ingested a few turkey vultures?

 

[aim9xray]

Oh no, far more interesting. Misaligned oil jet caught fire (internal engine fire). LPT shaft (long tom) was 3/4 melted through (circumference) when it failed (in tension load). With nothing to take thrust loads, the shaft and LPT shifted aft until the last stage mechanically interfaced the stators.

RUD and excitement ensued.

With no fan flow, the mixture is super rich, and the HPT overtemps and it then slags itself creating GE turbine gravel. Not to be outdone, the C sump oil return line is severed and that uncontained oil flow then catches fire. Now you have an internal and external engine fire. The pilot pulls the fire handle and stopcocks the throttle and and the engine shuts down, seizing to a stop and the fires go out.

The incident aircraft and wingman IFE'd to Eglin uneventfully. But on postflight, the pilot reportedly climbed up on the horizontal stab for a looksee. He reached over, grabbed the engine [core flow] exhaust nozzle, swung it through a 20 degree arc and called down to the ground "that's not normal, is it?"

 

[Scott Kenny]

Oh no, far more interesting. Misaligned oil jet caught fire (internal engine fire). LPT shaft (long tom) was 3/4 melted through (circumference) when it failed (in tension load). With nothing to take thrust loads, the shaft and LPT shifted aft until the last stage mechanically interfaced the stators.

RUD and excitement ensued.

With no fan flow, the mixture is super rich, and the HPT overtemps and it then slags itself creating GE turbine gravel. Not to be outdone, the C sump oil return line is severed and that uncontained oil flow then catches fire. Now you have an internal and external engine fire. The pilot pulls the fire handle and stopcocks the throttle and and the engine shuts down, seizing to a stop and the fires go out.

The incident aircraft and wingman IFE'd to Eglin uneventfully. But on postflight, the pilot reportedly climbed up on the horizontal stab for a looksee. He reached over, grabbed the engine [core flow] exhaust nozzle, swung it through a 20 degree arc and called down to the ground "that's not normal, is it?"

That's definitely interesting, in the Chinese sense of the phrase... Yikes!

Glad pilot and wing were okay after that...

 

[F119Doctor]

Oh no, far more interesting. Misaligned oil jet caught fire (internal engine fire). LPT shaft (long tom) was 3/4 melted through (circumference) when it failed (in tension load). With nothing to take thrust loads, the shaft and LPT shifted aft until the last stage mechanically interfaced the stators.

RUD and excitement ensued.

With no fan flow, the mixture is super rich, and the HPT overtemps and it then slags itself creating GE turbine gravel. Not to be outdone, the C sump oil return line is severed and that uncontained oil flow then catches fire. Now you have an internal and external engine fire. The pilot pulls the fire handle and stopcocks the throttle and and the engine shuts down, seizing to a stop and the fires go out.

The incident aircraft and wingman IFE'd to Eglin uneventfully. But on postflight, the pilot reportedly climbed up on the horizontal stab for a looksee. He reached over, grabbed the engine [core flow] exhaust nozzle, swung it through a 20 degree arc and called down to the ground "that's not normal, is it?"

You might be interested to know that having the thrust loads on the LPT causing it to move axially to mechanically interfere with the static parts during a shaft failure is a design requirement. Otherwise, the unloaded turbine will accelerate and over speed to the point of rotor rupture and uncontained pieces of the turbine disk flying out at very high speed ! It has happened in the past.

FYI - while you might think it is intuitive that the turbine is loaded aft, that is not always the case. The air pressure loads on the front and rear faces of the turbine disks can exceed those of the turbine blades. There is a lot of design work on managing the secondary airflow for cooling, bearing compartment sealing, and thrust load management.

 

[aim9xray]

You might be interested to know that having the thrust loads on the LPT causing it to move axially to mechanically interfere with the static parts during a shaft failure is a design requirement. Otherwise, the unloaded turbine will accelerate and over speed to the point of rotor rupture and uncontained pieces of the turbine disk flying out at very high speed ! It has happened in the past.

I did not know that; thank you. Explains the ball bearings up front and the roller bearing support in back. That would also allow for the axial thermal expansion/contraction of the LPT & HPT shafts.

In fact, that is indeed what happened, an uncontained LPT failure although I don't think the disk burst. The engine case was cut circumferentially. Back in the engine shop, it took only the removal of two sheet metal screws in the stub pylon and the rear of the engine was rolled away from the front.

 

[F119Doctor]

I did not know that; thank you. Explains the ball bearings up front and the roller bearing support in back. That would also allow for the axial thermal expansion/contraction of the LPT & HPT shafts.

In fact, that is indeed what happened, an uncontained LPT failure although I don't think the disk burst. The engine case was cut circumferentially. Back in the engine shop, it took only the removal of two sheet metal screws in the stub pylon and the rear of the engine was rolled away from the front.

You are correct that most jet engines have one ball bearing per rotor for axial positioning, usually toward the middle, with one or more roller bearings to accommodate thermal growth of the rotor towards each end. There are exceptions..