One problem with identifying 2025 PN7 as the Zond 1 probe is that the object’s closest approach to Earth is about 0.2 au, well shy of the required 0.72 au heliocentric distance. Could this instead be the Blok-L upper stage of the Zond 1 mission? Indeed, could the Blok-L have fallen short of Venus, in the way 2025 PN7 did?
The Zond 1 mission was a failure due to technological complications. Our dynamical calculations show that the Blok-L for the Zond 1 mission may have failed to deliver the required velocity boost ∆V, since after the Blok-L burn Zond 1 needed to conduct an additional burn (possibly to correct for a shortfall) on April 3, 1964. It is questionable whether the Zond 1 probe could have sufficiently corrected for such a ∆V deficit.
Calculation of the Blok-L’s brightness, based on a highly reflective albedo, gives approximately the observed value assuming a dimension of 3.2 meters. Comparing the inclination of 2025 PN7 around the time of Zond 1 launch with that of the spacecraft, we find 2.44 and 3.42 degrees respectively, not that different.
In conclusion, it is possible that 2025 PN7 is the Blok-L upper stage of the failed Russian Zond 1 mission to Venus, though this should be verified by spectroscopic analysis of the object. A measurement of the spectrum of 2025 PN7 could potentially reveal its surface composition and test whether its origin is technological. This was the method used to identify the space object 2020 SO discovered by the Pan-STARRS telescope in Hawaii on September 17, 2020 as the Centaur upper stage of the Surveyor 2 mission to the Moon launched by NASA on September 20, 1966. Pan-STARRS observations showed that the hollow object 2020 SO exhibited non-gravitational acceleration as it was pushed by sunlight. Spectroscopic observations by NASA’s Infrared Telescope Facility in December 2020 (as reported here) revealed that the surface spectrum is similar to that of stainless steel, confirming the technological origin of 2020 SO.