BonPlan2
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 5 June 2025
- Messages
- 581
- Reaction score
- 744
looks like a Patriot copy and paste.
looks like a Patriot copy and paste.
I’ve noticed that you keep reaching conclusions too quickly by taking snippets of what I’ve said and extrapolating an entire viewpoint from them -- then arguing against positions I never actually took.You’re overlooking something. Developing smaller number of missile projects doesn’t necessarily speed up the schedule, because the engineers and technicians are working for different companies. If you reduce the number of projects being developed by different companies, you’ll simply end up developing fewer missiles in the same amount of time. And if you force different companies to collaborate, the team becomes too large, the division of responsibilities becomes more complicated, and you still end up developing fewer missiles in the same amount of time. Brooks’s Law applies quite well to defense industry projects.
Nice catchFootage released today by official SSB X Account: View: https://x.com/SavunmaSanayii/status/2098462061726711962
IHA-300 / 300-ER Production line?
Yeah, most probably. I mean, the 300 series has been in production for more than 20 years. So, serial production of its ALBM version can begin moments after validation.IHA-300 / 300-ER Production line?
View: https://x.com/Defence_Turk/status/2098724435289047193?s=20
- (Siper's anti-ballistic capability) We won't have to wait too long, God willing. Siper-2 is nearing completion. Test firings and qualification processes are ongoing."
- "We'll also see '(hybrid seeker heads)' at ROKETSAN. We're working on many technologies, including IR and passive RF, as well as variants that lock onto seeker heads.