Reddington777
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 23 March 2025
- Messages
- 689
- Reaction score
- 2,218
Who else but the current admin is trying to cancel it?So. . .what? It can be cancelled?
Who else but the current admin is trying to cancel it?So. . .what? It can be cancelled?
Depends doesn't it. If they contract award then it might build some momentum from yearly congress top ups but if Congress are waiting for the current Administration to end then that will need another competition.Who else but the current admin is trying to cancel it?
The notion will be even shorter lived than USMC Tomcats.
The USN in fact has (limited) experience with the P&W F100. Adversary Squadron F-16A and B (initially built for Pakistan iirc) had that engine.(...) The USN has never had the F100, but they have operated the F110, and the F414 is too small. F110, F135, or smaller variant NGAP. Where they've already said they don't want NGAP ($$$) that leaves the F110 or F135. Unless they're making a smaller version of the F135, which there is zero evidence of, that leaves (unfortunately) the F110. Like powering a Tomcat with J75s.
The F414, even in higher thrust variant (discussed for two decades but never flown), won't suffice, unless you're going for more than two engines. The F/A-18E/F is already under-engined and under-performing. Now imagine an aircraft weighting several tons more equipped with those same engines, losing one immediately after take-off from the deck... Crew might not appreciate the experience.“Zero chance”
Huh. You must know something I don’t. GE has been whispering about expanded performance F414 variants for some time; they might have some interesting derivatives. I wouldn’t rule it out.
Because the military did not want to invest huge sums of money, and because the F-47 accounts for a large proportion of sixth-generation fighter jets, the military was unwilling to comply, and Congress "forced" it to.In the worst case F/A-XX just needs to outlast this administration.
The marines could do well with a beefed up F-35
I hope im not gonna come back and regret this comment
Speaking to reporters, Caudle said that following several conversations with Deputy Secretary of Defense Steve Feinberg, the Pentagon and the Navy, the downselect would occur in August.
“I think you’re going to see a downselect on this in August. I think that’s the month that they have committed to making the decision on the program,” he told reporters Monday at the Sea Air Space 2026 conference.
Boeing and Northrop Grumman are the two aviation contractors thought to be in the running for the F/A-XX that will eventually replace the Boeing F/A-18/E/F Super Hornet on the the Navy’s aircraft carriers in the 2030s. Boeing was selected last year to be the F-47 air superiority fighter for the Air Force while Northrop Grumman is building the B-21 Raider bomber, also for the Air Force.
Without naming a company, Caudle said one company was unable to meet the Navy’s timeline.
“One of the contractors who would make this plane for us is in a place where they really can’t deliver in the timeframe we need it. So there was a “check twice, cut once” kind of mentality here on this decision,” Caudle said.
Im still saying its NG, hasn't there been talks on being able to expand B-21 production? Sound like they're eager for more. Boeing is still building more spaces for the F-47 IIRC.“One of the contractors who would make this plane for us is in a place where they really can’t deliver in the timeframe we need it. So there was a “check twice, cut once” kind of mentality here on this decision,” Caudle said.
Fascinating.
Any unobvious thoughts given both are currently scaling some ambitious projects with NG and B-21 and Boeing with F-47?
Perhaps I am a bit skeptical but I have heard this before...“I think you’re going to see a downselect on this in August. I think that’s the month that they have committed to making the decision on the program,” he told reporters Monday at the Sea Air Space 2026 conference.
I've heard August too. One CEO (maybe both?) recently met with DEPSECDEF Feinberg and threatened to disband their standing team(s), which seems to have had the desired effect.Adm Caudle:
Speaking to reporters, Caudle said that following several conversations with Deputy Secretary of Defense Steve Feinberg, the Pentagon and the Navy, the downselect would occur in August.
“I think you’re going to see a downselect on this in August. I think that’s the month that they have committed to making the decision on the program,” he told reporters Monday at the Sea Air Space 2026 conference.
-----------
Boeing and Northrop Grumman are the two aviation contractors thought to be in the running for the F/A-XX that will eventually replace the Boeing F/A-18/E/F Super Hornet on the the Navy’s aircraft carriers in the 2030s. Boeing was selected last year to be the F-47 air superiority fighter for the Air Force while Northrop Grumman is building the B-21 Raider bomber, also for the Air Force.
Without naming a company, Caudle said one company was unable to meet the Navy’s timeline.
“One of the contractors who would make this plane for us is in a place where they really can’t deliver in the timeframe we need it. So there was a “check twice, cut once” kind of mentality here on this decision,” Caudle said.
This is not B-21 rendering released by NG, this is Air Force released rendering, which makes a _big_ difference...While a lot of 3D renderings are marketing BS, I think there's something to this one.
Wouldn't be the first time NG posts a rendering that accurately represents a never-before-seen aircraft
Sure as hell hope not. Boeing has been screwing up by the numbers for pretty much everything they've done in the last decade.Can't shed any light on the CNO's "timeline" comment. But I can reaffirm that B will be the winner., as originally planned.
F-16 XL style crank there.I am guessing this might just be an artistic render, but I thought it might be worth posting.
Sure as hell hope not. Boeing has been screwing up by the numbers for pretty much everything they've done in the last decade.
“One of the contractors who would make this plane for us is in a place where they really can’t deliver in the timeframe we need it,” Caudle said. “So there was, just, you know, 'check twice, cut once' kind of mentality here on this decision.”
Caudle did not name which of the two remaining bidders for the F/A-XX program falls short of the required capacity. Boeing and Northrop Grumman executives have said they have the ability to meet the Navy’s schedule for the fighter. The Navy eliminated Lockheed Martin from the competition nearly two years ago.
“I think you’re going to see a downselect on this in August,” Caudle said. “I think that’s the month that they have committed to making the decision on the program.”
AI slopI am guessing this might just be an artistic render, but I thought it might be worth posting.
AI slop
That's unfortunate, as I do kinda like the look.I am familiar with FA-XX from the NG side. You can look at my post history for more clues about the NG FA-XX submission.
Just dropping by to say the renders released today (outside of being an airplane) look nothing like the real submission.
I think top-mount intakes are highly unlikely for a fighter aircraft that may need to use high-alphas.What a perfect corner reflectors those inlet walls are on this slop. Steamed rendering has much more credibility than this.
So they've given up on close-range air combat?It's normal military tactic to keep people guessing till actually revealling to public, be it F-47 or F/A-XX.
It is hard to believe all the intakes on top for a fighter which may produce aerodynamic shadow at high AoA, stalling the engine.
This model looks like blended wing body, like mini-B-21, but compared to cockpit size the intakes & overall jet looks small, like just X-jet.
I hope Boeing can produce even better products.So we're saying that Boeing did the better tease?
Just adding to this - Having spoken/worked with someone who was familiar with both contractors' designs/progress (prior to the active source selections, so no restrictions on working with both), it seems that Boeing has been largely ahead most of the time. Primarily on schedule/maturity, unsure about design. Sentiments from program officials (from what I've been told second-hand) seem to reflect that same story. As always, grain of salt.I've heard August too. One CEO (maybe both?) recently met with DEPSECDEF Feinberg and threatened to disband their standing team(s), which seems to have had the desired effect.
Can't shed any light on the CNO's "timeline" comment. But I can reaffirm that B will be the winner., as originally planned.
Like many, I won't be surprised if Feinberg comes up with another reason to delay the award once again.
So they've given up on close-range air combat?