- Joined
- 17 May 2008
- Messages
- 705
- Reaction score
- 1,689
Indeed, but a great find nonetheless! Thanks a lot.Here are general arrangement drawings for the Martin 345 and 346. Distinctly different and not the most beautiful!![]()
top-mounted inlet like the F-107, interesting...NAA Vigilante
Needs to be contemporary candidate for a new USN competition "carrier based A-XX ".NAA Vigilante
top-mounted inlet like the F-107, interesting...
Name doesn't make sense, though. The A3J/A-5 was already under development in 1957.
The name comes from a two part weapons system concept the A3J being "Air Weapon #1" the TS-149 submission being "Air Weapon #2"Needs to be contemporary candidate for a new USN competition "carrier based A-XX ".
Now that is an interesting document. It looks like the idea is AW2 is the workhorse, and AW1 is the racehorse when you need maximum performance. The USAF F-111/A-7 combo might be a good comparison.The name comes from a two part weapons system concept the A3J being "Air Weapon #1" the TS-149 submission being "Air Weapon #2"
Looks sort of Vautourish to me. I have wondered about what a carrier-based Vautour would be like.More detailed drawing of the Douglas 715.
My dear Paul,
in Air Pictorial 10/1957,there was thirteen companies and not eight,so maybe those
companies were involved;
Convair,Fairchild,McDonnell,Northrop & Republic ?,for McDonnell,it was M-121.