martinbayer
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 6 January 2009
- Messages
- 4,735
- Reaction score
- 6,486
Please, do not turn this site into an online wargaming discussion group.
2 platoons of Bradleys is not "massive losses"Do massive Ukrainean tanks losses in counter-attack attempts in Summer 2023 prove this?
View attachment 778440
When you're talking about "what the new generation of tanks need to be," gaming is kinda required.Please, do not turn this site into an online wargaming discussion group.
It actually is not. You are (deliberately???) confusing actual *hardcore* Engineering with *slacker* Gaming. One is an actual profession, while the other one is based on my admittedly very limited insight on modern popular culture with what I take to be called Cincinnati Time-Waste as an example, see https://simpsonswiki.com/wiki/Cincinnati_Time_Waste:_Rules_and_Regulation2 platoons of Bradleys is not "massive losses"
When you're talking about "what the new generation of tanks need to be," gaming is kinda required.
Since the new tanks need doctrine figured out for them (in terms of whether each tank needs high-end anti-drone APS or if the company will have an AA vehicle or platoon), that's the part that needs gaming out.It actually is not. You are (deliberately???) confusing actual *hardcore* Engineering with *slacker* Gaming. One is an actual profession, while the other one is based on my admittedly very limited insight on modern popular culture with what I take to be called Cincinnati Time-Waste as an example, see https://simpsonswiki.com/wiki/Cincinnati_Time_Waste:_Rules_and_Regulation