Mitsubishi F-2 Viper Zero took its nickname from the legendary A6M Zero.
Nickname from whom? 'Viper Reisen' or 'Falcon Reisen' would seem a more natural name from the Japanese side, 'Viper Zero' sounds more like an English language fan construction. Both the LockMart and Mitsubishi websites simply call it the F-2, and as the article suggesting Reppu notes, the JSDF has no provision for naming aircraft beyond type designator and numerical sequence.
 
Nickname from whom? 'Viper Reisen' or 'Falcon Reisen' would seem a more natural name from the Japanese side, 'Viper Zero' sounds more like an English language fan construction. Both the LockMart and Mitsubishi websites simply call it the F-2, and as the article suggesting Reppu notes, the JSDF has no provision for naming aircraft beyond type designator and numerical sequence.
Most of the nicknames for Japanese military aircraft are unofficial and not given at the manufacturer level. The authorities decide through public contest, or the operators simply name them through tacit agreement. The name Viper Zero is an example of the latter, and Reppu is likely an extension of that.
 
政府が、英国、イタリアの3カ国で進める次期戦闘機の共同開発を巡り、インドに参画を打診していたことが分かった。
It has been learned that the Japanese government has approached India about joining the joint development of next-generation fighter jets with the UK and Italy.
 
政府が、英国、イタリアの3カ国で進める次期戦闘機の共同開発を巡り、インドに参画を打診していたことが分かった。
It has been learned that the Japanese government has approached India about joining the joint development of next-generation fighter jets with the UK and Italy.


IMO never ever! Then joining Germany into this program would be an even better and more realistic idea!
 
My translation was a bit strange.
What Japan proposed to India was "Participation," not "Joint development."

Participation could mean various things, including joint development, integrated approval of Indian weapons, and knock-down production.

I think it is unlikely that India will become a joint developer.
 
India eager to join GCAP, but Japan is concerned about the close relationships between India and Russia.


Just a reaction to this?
 
My translation was a bit strange.
What Japan proposed to India was "Participation," not "Joint development."

Participation could mean various things, including joint development, integrated approval of Indian weapons, and knock-down production.

I think it is unlikely that India will become a joint developer.

the title says participation
but when reading the body "共同開発" being used, which is means joint development
 
That's the complete opposite of what the GCAP nations have concluded. Pushing deep into hostile territory, beyond UHF datalinks, networked with a sqn of UCAVs, sixth-gen aircraft will have to have vast amounts of computing power to process the torrent of incoming sensor data. The smart part of munitions is only useful once all that data has been processed and for timeliness that will have to happen onboard, not back in home nation.

Doctrinally it also means a delegation of targetting authority to far-forward autonomous units, but that is something most NATO-aligned nations practice to some extent.

Now maybe that means a B-21 style platform would be better for some tasks; to some degree it does sound like the original B-2 mission of hunting SS-20s far behind the FLOT. but the GCAP still sees a need for high kinematic performance as well.

For that mission I'm surprised that GCAP is single-crew, surely a second pair of hands and eyes would be a boon.
R2 D2 is behind the pilot, no canopy as eterior vision would be via sensors and helmet mounted display crossover. Not sure how George Walton Lucas Jr gets his Royalty checks but no doubt there is a workaround.
 
India would certainly feed anything they got to Russia and PRC, would anyone that has a single grey cell extant and active, even consider that?

Not unless they had been at the shoe polish for too long, or perhaps smoked a REALLY grolly used carpet off the 'tip'.
 
How much of what Russia gets, can they NOT pass on to the PRC, considering how much they get in aid from them? Collaboration does not have to be direct to be effective.
 
The veracity of this report is unknown, but it seems that the nickname for the fighter jet in Japan will be "Reppu" (烈風).
Reppu means very strong wind.
It was the name of a fighter plane developed by Mitsubishi for use as a carrier-based aircraft for the navy during WWII.

What will Italy name it? Tempesta?Bora?Scirocco?
Mitsubishi F-2 Viper Zero took its nickname from the legendary A6M Zero. In keeping with tradition, it would be natural for the next fighter’s name to draw from the A7M Reppu, also crafted by the same manufacturer. The term Reppu translates directly to 「Fierce Storm」, which corresponds well with the English name Tempest.

That said, the original Reppu was an unfortunate aircraft, failing to meet its ROC and never advancing beyond the prototype phase.
Honestly hope it's false info. If they ever decide to give it some sort of nickname, I hope it's something like Hayate or Hayabusa
 
the title says participation
but when reading the body "共同開発" being used, which is means joint development
but the context is quite important here.
政府が、英国、イタリアの3カ国で進める次期戦闘機の共同開発を巡り、インドに参画を打診していたことが分かった。
could read as that they are offering a seat in the joint development, but it could also mean any kind of participation into the "joint development programme between Japan, UK and Italy", meaning it could be other things apart from joint development itself.

If anything, considering past stance of the Japanese government concerning potentially interested parties, I don't think they would've offered India to actually join-in in any way.
 
What could India even realistically bring to the table other than money and a large workforce? Their expertise in aviation is...less than stellar. And if they can't bring programs like Tejas or AMCA to fruition in humane time frames, how valuable could their contribution be to the very cutting edge on aviation.

Aside from them being very tricky partners on top of that. With an ever present desire to have specs most suited to them and as much economical benefit/involvement as possible.

If GCAP desperately needs even more members than it already has to get anywhere, than the future of that program should already be called into question. Approaching potential future customers is one thing, but trying to get the likes of Saudi Arabia or India for presumably more money involved isn't painting a pretty picture.
 
Word is India has started shopping around for fifth gen due to slow progress in its domestic development programs but also because it has been spooked by the Chinese demonstrators and thinks the timescale for needing a counter has shortened. Cant see the GCAP partners wanting to sell to India though.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom