TomcatViP

Hellcat
Joined
12 February 2017
Messages
7,798
Reaction score
8,843
1614450798025.png

 
"Our robust digital engineering and advanced manufacturing practices deliver affordable dominant weapon systems to the #warfighter with the speed and lethality required to maintain overmatch."

*Rolling eyes* It sounds like something an AI software would generate trying to make the shortest grammatically correct sentence that uses ALL the buzzwords. Why does everyone in the industry feel the need to write this way? And then the buzzwords are on rotation, like fads. :mad:

Sorry, end of rant.
 
"Our robust digital engineering and advanced manufacturing practices deliver affordable dominant weapon systems to the #warfighter with the speed and lethality required to maintain overmatch."

*Rolling eyes* It sounds like something an AI software would generate trying to make the shortest grammatically correct sentence that uses ALL the buzzwords. Why does everyone in the industry feel the need to write this way? And then the buzzwords are on rotation, like fads. :mad:

Sorry, end of rant.
I have 1980s video tapes, one called Guided Missiles, IIRC that uses pretty much the exact language describing weapon systems. The more thing change the more they stay the same.
 

View attachment 652228
An illustrative concept of a future unmanned aircraft that might field capabilities of the type that the USAF is now seeking for its Next-Generation Multirole Unmanned Aircraft System Family of Systems requirement. (Lockheed Martin)

I must say, I was just thinking about the design requirements for survivable loitering drones and this picture pretty much hits it head on.
 
Last edited:
The time frame is suspiciously close to the B-21 IOC. Given the secondary emphasis on more endurance and survivability, I wonder if they don't envision B-21's with A2A drone escorts operating well outside the range of tac air. This would make a lot of sense in the Pacific Theater where distances are vast and local bases are few compared to the Chinese mainland.
 
The time frame is suspiciously close to the B-21 IOC. Given the secondary emphasis on more endurance and survivability, I wonder if they don't envision B-21's with A2A drone escorts operating well outside the range of tac air. This would make a lot of sense in the Pacific Theater where distances are vast and local bases are few compared to the Chinese mainland.
Well if you want to believe the rumours the B-21 already has a drone ‘associate’ in the alleged RQ-180.
 
"Our robust digital engineering and advanced manufacturing practices deliver affordable dominant weapon systems to the #warfighter with the speed and lethality required to maintain overmatch."

*Rolling eyes* It sounds like something an AI software would generate trying to make the shortest grammatically correct sentence that uses ALL the buzzwords. Why does everyone in the industry feel the need to write this way? And then the buzzwords are on rotation, like fads. :mad:

Sorry, end of rant.
What's disturbing is hearing somebody speak like that in person. Eyes rolling all over the place.
 
The time frame is suspiciously close to the B-21 IOC. Given the secondary emphasis on more endurance and survivability, I wonder if they don't envision B-21's with A2A drone escorts operating well outside the range of tac air. This would make a lot of sense in the Pacific Theater where distances are vast and local bases are few compared to the Chinese mainland.
I'd imagine the B-21 will be carrying its own escorts.
 
Hey. There was a much higher quality of this GA-ASI Ad i once saw and thought was lost forever, but fortunately i managed to find this tweet with... a different view of the MQ-Next. At first sight, despite the blurriness, the chine and leading edge seem to slightly angle back, similar to the NG Sensorcraft. Compared side to side, these two are clearly not the same render:eek::
Screenshot (5).png
1614580727b.jpg
View: https://twitter.com/GenAtomics_ASI/status/1441546250541699083?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1441546250541699083%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpublish.twitter.com%2F%3Fquery%3Dhttps3A2F2Ftwitter.com2FGenAtomics_ASI2Fstatus2F1441546250541699083widget%3DTweet
 
Last edited:
Changes based upon orientations, especially with a flying wing design, its the same vehicle.
 

In the 2000s, semi-autonomous unmanned air combat vehicle (UCAV) technology was proving to be the greatest revolution in air combat since the jet engine, then it disappeared totally from the Air Force plans and nomenclature. It was as if the idea of stealthy, long-range drones simply never existed. Now, as the U.S. faces growing threats from peer state competitors with highly capable integrated air defense systems, environments in which the Air Force's current fleet of MQ-9 Reaper drones cannot survive, the UCAV has suddenly become the next big item on the Air Force's shopping list.

Dubbed the MQ-Next, the exact requirements for the Air Force's next-generation combat drone initiative remain undefined, but the service has reached out to its industry partners to see what they have to offer. Northrop Grumman, a company known for its low-observable (stealth) design capabilities and its bright history with advanced unmanned systems—namely the X-47 demonstrators and the RQ-4 Global Hawk—has thrown their hat in the ring for what will be an emerging highly-lucrative tender in the coming years.

With that in mind, Richard Sullivan, a Vice President of Program Management at Northrop Grumman, talked in-depth with The War Zone not just about their own potential drone offerings under the MQ-Next initiative, but also about their shadowy Distributed Autonomy Responsive Control (DARC) advanced mission management system that aims to control not just the MQ-Next vehicles, but what will be a family of interconnected unmanned systems that will rule the skies in the not so distant future.

What Sullivan describes in our discussion is exactly what the author posited half a decade ago, down to the platform-agnostic command and control software that will control future autonomous swarms and the other assets that will enable them. You can read all about that, as well as a deep examination of the mysterious disappearance of the UCAV from the Air Force's portfolio around 2010 and the massive implications of that reality in this past War Zone feature. In fact, to understand the potential UCAVs offer and what MQ-Next truly represents, it really is a must-read.

1654853421796.png

1654853471160.png
 
Ahhh, no. Likely high to very high bypass turbofans for high persistence at medium altitude. Depends on the COTS engine selected.
 
Ahhh, no. Likely high to very high bypass turbofans for high persistence at medium altitude. Depends on the COTS engine selected.
There's no room for serpentine inlets in the concept shown. If you ask me, it's useless to have a planform aligned configuration but radars can see your fan face.
 
Ahhh, no. Likely high to very high bypass turbofans for high persistence at medium altitude. Depends on the COTS engine selected.
There's no room for serpentine inlets in the concept shown. If you ask me, it's useless to have a planform aligned configuration but radars can see your fan face.

Just cover the inlets with gridded blockers.
 

Attachments

  • 307837138_1494709450977913_4092496813820536114_n.mp4_snapshot_00.51_[2022.09.19_20.12.48].jpg
    307837138_1494709450977913_4092496813820536114_n.mp4_snapshot_00.51_[2022.09.19_20.12.48].jpg
    44.9 KB · Views: 54
  • 307837138_1494709450977913_4092496813820536114_n.mp4_snapshot_00.50_[2022.09.19_20.12.39].jpg
    307837138_1494709450977913_4092496813820536114_n.mp4_snapshot_00.50_[2022.09.19_20.12.39].jpg
    200.3 KB · Views: 59
  • 307837138_1494709450977913_4092496813820536114_n.mp4_snapshot_00.46_[2022.09.19_20.12.23].jpg
    307837138_1494709450977913_4092496813820536114_n.mp4_snapshot_00.46_[2022.09.19_20.12.23].jpg
    188 KB · Views: 67
If you ask me, it's useless to have a planform aligned configuration but radars can see your fan face.

Other countries:
dd0.png

The original design made more sense. When the first image with the revised inlets and exhausts was posted I assumed this was an attempt to hide the "real" inlet design. Now that they've posted a video, etc. I can only assume the new inlet is the real design. That would have some severe penalties in drag and RCS
 
That would have some severe penalties in drag and RCS
May I rephrase that sentence as a thought experiment...

That would have some severe trade-offs in drag and RCS in favor of _______ ?
 
Back
Top Bottom