X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle (OTV)

US military's mysterious X-37B space plane zooms toward orbital record​

By Leonard David published 3 days ago


The U.S. military's X-37B robotic space plane is closing in on a mission-duration record.

The X-37B launched to Earth orbit on May 17, 2020 on the sixth mission for the program, a flight known as Orbital Test Vehicle-6 (OTV-6).
The Space Force minishuttle has now been aloft for 773 days. That's just a week shy of the X-37B record of 780 days, which was set on OTV-5. (That program record doesn't come close to the overall mark for an orbital stay; for example, the Landsat-5 satellite observed Earth from orbit for 29 years.

Onboard experiments​

While the Boeing-built robotic space plane's primary orbital agendas are classified, some of its onboard experiments were disclosed before launch.

One such experiment, from the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), investigates transforming solar power into radio frequency microwave energy. The experiment is called the Photovoltaic Radio-frequency Antenna Module, or PRAM for short.

We also know that OTV-6 included the deployment of FalconSat-8, a small satellite developed by the U.S. Air Force Academy and sponsored by the Air Force Research Laboratory to conduct several experiments on orbit.

In addition, two NASA experiments are tucked onboard the space plane to study the effects of the space environment on a materials sample plate and seeds used to grow food.

OTV-6 is the first X-37B mission to use a service module to host experiments. The service module is an attachment to the aft of the vehicle that allows additional experimental payload capability to be carried to orbit.

Earlier flights​

Here's a roster of the previous X-37B missions, each of which lasted longer than its immediate predecessor:

  • OTV-1 launched on April 22, 2010 and landed on Dec. 3, 2010, spending over 224 days on orbit.
  • OTV-2 launched on March 5, 2011 and landed on June 16, 2012, spending over 468 days on orbit.
  • OTV-3 launched on Dec. 11, 2012 and landed on Oct. 17, 2014, spending over 674 days on orbit.
  • OTV-4 launched on May 20, 2015 and landed on May 7, 2017, spending nearly 718 days on orbit.
  • OTV-5 launched on Sept. 7, 2017 and landed on Oct. 27, 2019, spending nearly 780 days on orbit.

It's unclear when and where OTV-6 will come down to Earth. OTV-1, OTV-2 and OTV-3 landed at Vandenberg Space Force Base California, while OTV-4 and OTV-5 touched down at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Overseeing operations​

The X-37B program is flown under the auspices of a U.S. Space Force unit called Delta 9, which was established in July 2020.

"Delta 9 Detachment 1 oversees operations of the X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle, an experimental program designed to demonstrate technologies for a reliable, reusable, unmanned space test platform for the U.S. Space Force," Space Force officials wrote in a Delta 9 fact sheet .

"The mission of Delta 9 is to prepare, present, and project assigned and attached forces for the purpose of conducting protect-and-defend operations and providing national decision authorities with response options to deter and, when necessary, defeat orbital threats," the fact sheet explains. "Additionally, Delta 9 supports Space Domain Awareness by conducting space-based battlespace characterization operations and also conducts on-orbit experimentation and technology demonstrations for the U.S. Space Force."

Vehicle features​

The Space Force is thought to have two X-37B vehicles in its fleet, both of which were built by Boeing. The X-37B launches vertically atop a rocket and lands horizontally on a runway, like NASA's old space shuttle orbiter.

The military space plane looks a lot like the now-retired shuttle, in fact, but it's much smaller — just 29 feet (8.8 meters) long, compared to 122 feet (37 m). There's another key difference as well: NASA's shuttle was crewed, whereas the X-37B is robotic.

Boeing has noted that the X-37B features many elements that mark a first use in orbit for a space plane, including fully automated de-orbit and landing functions, flight controls and brakes that use all electro-mechanical actuation (no hydraulics) and a body made of a relatively light composite structure, rather than traditional aluminum.

"The X-37B is one of the world's newest and most advanced re-entry spacecraft, designed to operate in low Earth orbit, 150 to 500 miles [240 to 800 kilometers] above the Earth," Boeing wrote in a vehicle description (opens in new tab). "The vehicle is the first since the space shuttle with the ability to return experiments to Earth for further inspection and analysis. This United States [Space] Force unmanned space vehicle explores reusable vehicle technologies that support long-term space objectives."

The X-37B was designed to fly missions that last up to 270 days, Boeing noted. But every flight except the first has zoomed well past that supposed limit.

 
I assume the biggest constraint to its on orbit time is maneuvering fuel to maintain altitude?
 
After 908 days on orbit it is back on Earth.

View: https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/status/1591414072884477953

View: https://twitter.com/DutchSpace/status/1591433025308721153?


Waiting for an official update & landing time, after going through several sonic booms reports, they seem to center around 05:17 am local time (10:17 UTC) purely from memory, sonic boom to landing on shuttle had like a 4 or 5 minute delta so landing time in the 05:23 ball park ?
 
And here's the official announcement

View: https://twitter.com/BoeingSpace/status/1591468178923835398?

First ever image released of the X-37b with its service module.

View: https://twitter.com/DutchSpace/status/1591468820136345601
 
View: https://twitter.com/spcplcyonline/status/1591473746476400642


Interesting statement in there about the service module detaching from X-37B before reentry and will be "disposed of in accordance with best practices" followed by a quote from SecAF Kendall saying that "speaks" to the US "commitment to safe and responsible space practices.:


The service module successfully separated from the OTV before landing, which is a necessary activity due to the aerodynamic forces experienced by the X-37B vehicle upon re-entry. In the coming weeks, the service module will be disposed of in accordance with best practices. Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall said, "The deliberate manner in which we conduct onorbit operations-to include the service module disposal-speaks to the United States' commitment to safe and responsible space practices, particularly as the issue of growing orbital debris threatens to impact global space operations."

View: https://twitter.com/sciguyspace/status/1591474296303779841


Do you read that as a shot at Long March 5B, or is the statement of "orbital debris" targeted at someone/thing else?

View: https://twitter.com/spcplcyonline/status/1591475542632452096


I took it as lead-by-example support for the effort to establish norms of responsible behavior in space, which applies to all space actors, some more than others.
 
Do you read that as a shot at Long March 5B, or is the statement of "orbital debris" targeted at someone/thing else?

View: https://twitter.com/spcplcyonline/status/1591475542632452096


I took it as lead-by-example support for the effort to establish norms of responsible behavior in space, which applies to all space actors, some more than others.
It’s actually compliance with National Space policy. Every reasonable effort must be made to control de-orbit upper stages, that was law when I did space launch 2010-12, you had to have a really good reason to get a waiver (ie. priceless national asset that uses all margin to get to its orbit and there isn’t anything bigger to lift it). Yes, sometimes that meant adding a solid so the upper stage would comply with that policy.
 
Well this is new the next X-37B launch will not be using a F9 as before but a FH. Probably because it’s going to a different, I suspect higher orbit. Launch is set for the 7th December. One NASA experiment Seeds-2 has been identified as flying onboard. It will be once again flying with a service module. Mission is fully expendable so could be going to a very high orbit considering the size of vehicle, though we don’t know if the service module is identical to the last one which was left behind.

 
Last edited:
Seems likely it could be due to the mass of the service module, perhaps last time it wasn’t fully fuelled, and this time it is so requires the FH to launch the pair of them.
 
Seems likely it could be due to the mass of the service module, perhaps last time it wasn’t fully fuelled, and this time it is so requires the FH to launch the pair of them.

Apparently the core is being expended, so I think we’re looking at a much higher orbit.
 
Apparently the core is being expended, so I think we’re looking at a much higher orbit.



Capture d'écran 2023-11-09 152147.png

Atlas 501 LEO payload: 6 to 9 tons

Falcon 9 LEO payload: 23 tons.

Falcon Heavy payload: 64 tons.

The X-37B only weight *5 tons*

So, I have no idea how will they use that enormous excess power / payload. But it should be rather huge: either plane changes or climbing or perhaps an "exotic" orbit - not sure however if the X-37B can survive a return from GTO or GEO, probably not (heatshield)
 
Last edited:
Random calculations: just saying that, if the X-37B weights 5 tons and FH can orbit 60 tons+, that's kind of twelve times "payload overkill". That's quite a lot of "overkill" even for a polar orbit and even with some kind of propulsion or payload module clung to the rear bulkhead.
 
Nope, the heatshield can't handle anything beyond LEO & polar orbit: reentry velocity of 8 km/s. GTO, GEO, earth escape velocity, cislunar are 11 km/s+, and the X-37B would be toast.
Plane changes, on the other hand...
 
Nope, the heatshield can't handle anything beyond LEO & polar orbit: reentry velocity of 8 km/s. GTO, GEO, earth escape velocity, cislunar are 11 km/s+, and the X-37B would be toast.
Plane changes, on the other hand...
How about using aerobraking?
 
Can't really go in a very high orbit, since deorbiting from it would incur much higher heat loads.
Could a Heavy deliver an X-37B and additional fuel to geostationary orbit wherein the X-37B could, at a future date, lower its altitude/speed to a lower orbit so it doesn't burn up on reentry? (Though I guess the fairing on the Heavy might limit what you could do.)
 
Even if X-37 were a hollow shell filled full of hypergolics...it wouldn't mass out to 60 tons, right?

Maybe a hypergolic Transtage on the sly?

Batteries for some purpose?
 
Nope, the heatshield can't handle anything beyond LEO & polar orbit: reentry velocity of 8 km/s. GTO, GEO, earth escape velocity, cislunar are 11 km/s+, and the X-37B would be toast.
Plane changes, on the other hand...
Cislunar means that it would have to de-orbit moon first before re-entering earth. Hence re-entry velocity are not relevant. See that 60t max payload might be used for hosting a transit module.
 
A military solicitation document released when the Air Force procured the rocket for the USSF-52 mission—which we now know will launch the X-37B—said this mission would require a lift capacity of around 14,000 pounds (6,350 kilograms) into a geostationary transfer orbit, a highly elliptical loop around Earth ranging some 22,000 miles (35,000 kilometers) from the planet. That would be a big change from the past missions of the military's mini-space shuttle.

But this document is now more than 5 years old, and the circumstances of the mission may have changed. The military typically doesn't publish the orbital parameters of its space missions, but watchful amateur sleuths can estimate altitude and inclination with publicly available information like airspace and maritime warning notices associated with a rocket launch. Those are usually released closer to the launch date.
 
Nope, the heatshield can't handle anything beyond LEO & polar orbit: reentry velocity of 8 km/s. GTO, GEO, earth escape velocity, cislunar are 11 km/s+, and the X-37B would be toast.
Plane changes, on the other hand...
I doubt this is the last vehicle to fly so it’s been on the ground for years so plenty of time to upgrade the heat shield for higher orbits. Plus that NASA experiment flying seeds, putting them long term at a higher orbit would be useful for future manned missions which is what that the press release indicates the experiment is for.
 
I doubt this is the last vehicle to fly so it’s been on the ground for years so plenty of time to upgrade the heat shield for higher orbits. Plus that NASA experiment flying seeds, putting them long term at a higher orbit would be useful for future manned missions which is what that the press release indicates the experiment is for.
Not really. It isn't even shaped properly for such entries.
 
It could be a dual payload and drop of the X-37 in a lower orbit.
This is my thought as well. If the X-37 can't sustain a high orbit, then maybe there is more than one payload. That booster stack is practically an order of magnitude more energetic than previous X-37 missions. Whatever is happening, it should be interesting to watch.
 
Cislunar means that it would have to de-orbit moon first before re-entering earth. Hence re-entry velocity are not relevant. See that 60t max payload might be used for hosting a transit module.
No, Cislunar is between earth and the moon and not necessarily lunar orbit.
 
So that Falcon Heavy could drop a KH-11 (or whatever the name nowadays) and then the X-37B ?
 
It could be a dual payload and drop of the X-37 in a lower orbit.
I thought there would be no space as it’s using the normal payload shroud and it already has the X-37B & service module stacked in there. But apparently according to the posters over on NSF there is space for another payload in there.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom