• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

"Wildgans", "Libelle", "Wespe", P.1106: bogus Messerschmitt Projects?

Zizi6785

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
263
Reaction score
12
Me P.1106B (???)

New what-if project or real? A don't remember two-set version and the wing shape is different too.
 

Attachments

Michel Van

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
4,197
Reaction score
70
Re: Me P.1106B (???)

sadly it is fake from post war era
more info here
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,20040.msg254291.html#msg254291
and here
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,6587.0.html
 

Zizi6785

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
263
Reaction score
12
Re: Me P.1106B (???)

Michel Van said:
sadly it is fake from post war era
more info here
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,20040.msg254291.html#msg254291
and here
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,6587.0.html
Yes, it is fake, but not from post war era, it is from this year :)
 

airman

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
1,102
Reaction score
18
Website
zeef.com
Re: Me P.1106B (???)

Can be described also a " what if " around the real project Me.P1106 ! :)
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
23,769
Reaction score
816
Hi,

with great respect to all members here,I agree with you as they were a bogus Projects,but can anyone
give us a reliable source,say they were a fake ?.

About no numbered for them,I want to say; Messerschmitt had probably anther series as I know,for
example the P.65 was redesigned as P.1065,and a Germany sources said that; those Projects were
appeared from February to April 1945 ?!,(some magazines and books).
 

Orionblamblam

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
7,325
Reaction score
190
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
Vladimir said:
And Did someone have more info about Zestrorer I concept?
It's *not* a zerstorer. The earliest publication of that diagram that anyone has found was a few years post-war, and was not described as a wartime design; it was called a passenger transport. And if you look at it, you can see the passenger windows. Windows that do *not* make sense for a military aircraft

What it appears to be is a rocket-boosted ramjet or turbojet powered high speed jetliner.
 

GTX

All hail the God of Frustration!!!
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
2,651
Reaction score
31
Website
beyondthesprues.com
hesham said:
with great respect to all members here,I agree with you as they were a bogus Projects,but can anyone
give us a reliable source,say they were a fake ?.
Are you actually asking for proof that they were fake? :eek:
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
23,769
Reaction score
816
GTX said:
hesham said:
with great respect to all members here,I agree with you as they were a bogus Projects,but can anyone
give us a reliable source,say they were a fake ?.
Are you actually asking for proof that they were fake? :eek:
Yes my dear GTX.
 

newsdeskdan

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
774
Reaction score
97
hesham said:
GTX said:
hesham said:
with great respect to all members here,I agree with you as they were a bogus Projects,but can anyone
give us a reliable source,say they were a fake ?.
Are you actually asking for proof that they were fake? :eek:
Yes my dear GTX.
In order to get definitive proof, you would need to find whoever the anonymous source was who handed them to Karl Pawlas in the mid-1970s. The appearance of these designs in Luftfahrt International Nr. 18 of 1976 was the first time anyone had ever seen them and is the only source for them. Pawlas himself, who clearly stated in the article that they could be postwar designs, died in 2014 so we can't ask him (it'd be great if someone in Germany could track down his family and see whether it'd be possible to access his personal archive, if it still survives).
The evidence for the 'animal names' designs is circumstantial but take a look at the 'P 1106' and 'P 1108' which appear alongside them and are presumably from the same source. In both cases, the designs broadly resemble the Messerschmitt originals - which we now have - but are 'off' in several respects, as though they have been drawn from memory.
What I would say is, we unfortunately cannot be 100% certain that the 'animal names' designs are fake. Maybe 99% but not 100%. And there are still Messerschmitt designs out there, I think, that no one has yet seen. For example, I have a report on an interview with Ludwig Bölkow - who was in charge of the P 1108 project - in which he states that among the configurations considered for the P 1108 was one with forward-swept wings. Given that the P 1108 is very nearly a flying wing, that must've been one heck of a design and one that no one's yet seen. So no proof unless you can track down Pawlas' family, access his archive, track down the anonymous drawing donor and extract some sort of confession from him.
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
23,769
Reaction score
816
Thank you my dear Dan,

and I think a great magazine (Luftfahrt) didn't chance by its reputation and published a fake designs,second,for
the drawings were very close to P.1106 & P.1108,I give you an example,I am a very small designer of aircraft,I created
about 30 types,in many of them,you will see front nose,wings shape,landing gear and tail unit were resemble
to each other,that's a clue for me the creator,in the same case the Messerschmitt.
 

newsdeskdan

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
774
Reaction score
97
hesham said:
Thank you my dear Dan,

and I think a great magazine (Luftfahrt) didn't chance by its reputation and published a fake designs,second,for
the drawings were very close to P.1106 & P.1108,I give you an example,I am a very small designer of aircraft,I created
about 30 types,in many of them,you will see front nose,wings shape,landing gear and tail unit were resemble
to each other,that's a clue for me the creator,in the same case the Messerschmitt.
I admire your persistence in believing in a fantasy. Pawlas thought they were probably fake, and there's a 99% chance that they are. Surely it's better to go looking for the real lost Messerschmitt designs than keep on clinging to these dodgy doodles.
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
23,769
Reaction score
816
I don't believe in fantasy at all,by who rejected those Projects can't give us a reliable source to confirm.
 

newsdeskdan

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
774
Reaction score
97
Leaving aside the fact that Pawlas put them in Luftfahrt International, persuade me that you're right, and that they're real. What is it about them that convinces you?
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
23,769
Reaction score
816
newsdeskdan said:
Leaving aside the fact that Pawlas put them in Luftfahrt International, persuade me that you're right, and that they're real. What is it about them that convinces you?
Of course not,a reliable source only.
 

Orionblamblam

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
7,325
Reaction score
190
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
Aviation Week is considered a reliable source, yet they've published incorrect, goofy and just plain unsubstantiated stuff from time to time (Soviet atomic bombers, "flaming pumpkin seeds," Aurora sightings, etc.).

Luftfarht Intl. also published nonsense about German wartime flying saucers.
 

newsdeskdan

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
774
Reaction score
97
hesham said:
newsdeskdan said:
Leaving aside the fact that Pawlas put them in Luftfahrt International, persuade me that you're right, and that they're real. What is it about them that convinces you?
Of course not,a reliable source only.
I wouldn't characterise Pawlas as entirely reliable. He did invaluable work in printing facsimiles of original documents but as a writer, editor and critic he was very much of his time. The most reliable German secret projects author seems so far to be Walter Schick and even he wasn't above getting things wrong. Creek and Smith are generally good, Forsyth too, and Lommel. Griehl has his moments. Not one of them is entirely infallible.
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
23,769
Reaction score
816
hesham said:
Of course not,a reliable source only.
That's your guess,speculation and opinion,not convince me,maybe all of them were fake,but as I learned in this great site,
only reliable source can confirm that.

In the book; Die Deutsche Luftruestung 1933-1945 - Vol.3 - Henschel-Messerschmitt,which my dear Justo quote from it in
rely # 15,they insisted about those were a real Projects,and even anther un-numbered Projects consider a real in that bible,
and I am asking,why you don't object on those Projects also ?!.
 

Attachments

newsdeskdan

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
774
Reaction score
97
hesham said:
hesham said:
Of course not,a reliable source only.
That's your guess,speculation and opinion,not convince me,maybe all of them were fake,but as I learned in this great site,
only reliable source can confirm that.

In the book; Die Deutsche Luftruestung 1933-1945 - Vol.3 - Henschel-Messerschmitt,which my dear Justo quote from it in
rely # 15,they insisted about those were a real Projects,and even anther un-numbered Projects consider a real in that bible,
and I am asking,why you don't object on those Projects also ?!.
I have that book, and some bits and pieces from Nowarra's collection which was broken up and sold after his death. The first drawing is from a 1950s report that's unrelated to Messerschmitt - there was a copy of it on eBay a couple of years back. I'm guessing it got lumped in with 'Messerschmitt' because of its P 1109-ish layout. The second drawing is one of the 1976 animal names designs (Nowarra was writing in the early 1990s) and the third one I don't know, although I vaguely recall seeing it somewhere other than Nowarra's chuck-absolutely-everything-in-no-matter-where-you-got-it four volume set. The first one is definitely not Messerschmitt, the second is 99% likely to be not Messerschmitt and the third, don't know.

EDIT: Knew I'd seen that third drawing somewhere before. It's on p174 of Dieter Herwig and Heinz Rode's Luftwaffe Secret Projects: Ground Attack and Special Purpose Aircraft, only they show the actual drawing (apparently the same design appeared in Messerschmitt drawing XVIII/104 and XVIII/105) rather than a poor re-draw. As an aside, I'd suggest that the text accompanying both the Nowarra image and the Herwig/Rode one is, well, wrong. I'd further suggest that very little is known about the XVIII/104 and XVIII/105 drawings other than what's actually written on them. And we don't get to see XVIII/105.
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
23,769
Reaction score
816
Orionblamblam said:
Aviation Week is considered a reliable source, yet they've published incorrect, goofy and just plain unsubstantiated stuff from time to time (Soviet atomic bombers, "flaming pumpkin seeds," Aurora sightings, etc.).

Luftfarht Intl. also published nonsense about German wartime flying saucers.
No way to compare,AW displayed just a speculative designs,but for Luftfahrt,they introduced a real Projects
depended on Pawlas report or source,I can't imagine he faked all those and not enough,but lied on people
to submit a fantasy concepts,how come ?.

For flying saucers,we know very well it was many real Luftwaffe Projects in this field,so hard to judge.
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
23,769
Reaction score
816
From Jet Planes of the Third Reich - The Secret Projects-volume one,

the author claims that,the Messerschmitt Schwalbe maybe called P.1115,also some
drawings to P.1106.
 

Attachments

newsdeskdan

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
774
Reaction score
97
hesham said:
From Jet Planes of the Third Reich - The Secret Projects-volume one,

the author claims that,the Messerschmitt Schwalbe maybe called P.1115,also some
drawings to P.1106.
Strange that the P 1106 should have been included in this topic, since it was real! Maybe it was meant to be the P 1116, which wasn't.
 

Sherman Tank

I don't want to change my personal text
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
87
Reaction score
5
I don't suppose there's much chance of these designs being genuine but misattributed to Messerschmitt, or is there?
 
Top