Wurger said:
I`m with you, Vladimir

! Just saying it`s a fake is not good enough. Karl Pawlas was a reference indeed, Overscan! I guess you scepticals have a lot of homework to justify your statements
The reverse is true. The evidence against them being 'real' is overwhelming. The Americans captured Oberammergau at the end of the war and subsequently arrested and interviewed Waldemar Voigt and all his designers. They spoke freely about their designs and many subsequently went to work for the Americans, including Voigt. None of them at any point mentioned any of the 'animal names' designs but there was loads of material on the P.1107, P.1108, P.1110, P.1111 and P.1112.
Then in the 1970s, 30 years later, a guy whose name we don't know gets in touch with Pawlas and gives or sells him material of an unspecified nature which purports to give information about previously unknown Messerschmitt types. The guy tells Pawlas that he worked for Messerschmitt.
Pawlas, renowned for printing original drawings, does not appear to do so on this occasion.
The drawings printed in Luftfahrt lack info panels, drawing numbers or any other company-specific markings. They don't have project numbers even though every other Messerschmitt project was given one, or at least a utilitarian descriptive name like 'Three-seater Night Fighter', '1-Jet-Fighter' or 'Long Range Bomber'.
The outline of the jet engine shown in each case fails to match that of any German WW2 jet engine; most lack any sort of weapons installation information; they have oddly-shaped canopies that are entirely unlike those on any other Messerschmitt type, their undercarriages are similarly unfamiliar. In short, they look 'wrong'.
And to top it all, Pawlas says he's not sure whether these are wartime designs or designs drawn up after the war.
If the mere fact that Pawlas printed them at all is the only evidence of any sort to be found anywhere in the world that they are real then, case closed.
Besides Pawlas, what is it about the drawings that convinces you they are genuine?