VTOL On Demand Mobility

martinbayer said:
One surefire way for electric VTOL companies to shield themselves from any liability claims with respect to hawking designs with potentially risky business batteries on board - just sell them as "Batteries Not Included"...
Click to expand...
..."charging station sold separately"
 
https://twitter.com/x/status/1689240215448125440
View: https://twitter.com/penandpaper1989/status/1689240215448125440


verticalmag.com

Vertical’s VX4 eVTOL prototype crashes during test flight

U.K.-based Vertical Aerospace’s experimental prototype aircraft crashed during a test flight on Aug. 9 at Cotswold Airport. The company confirmed the aircraft was remotely piloted and there were no injuries during the accident.
verticalmag.com verticalmag.com

Thank goodness it was an unmanned flight.. From what I've read, they have enough funds to cover another 12 more months of operations. Hopefully this doesn't chase away potential investors.
 
Last edited:
The outside wing sections are folded by the force of impact while the fuselage is not ruptured or breached. Only the landing gear did fail.
While it does not bode well for the structural integrity of the wing, it could also mean that the crash demonstrates a level of survability for passengers that is interesting.
Let's see the crash report.
 
Last edited:
@alberchico Unlike the author of this article, I can understand that you first do some analysis before you are going out to the public and tell them what exactly had happened. There is nothing worse than changing to different explanations withing a short time frame. So even if the journalist are losing their patience, you need to be carful with what you say and stay to the truth.
 

Daily Memo: eVTOL Operators Face Long Road To Profitability | Aviation Week Network

Many investors bought into electric air-taxi companies in 2021 hoping to find the next Tesla, but instead they may be stuck with the next Uber.
aviationweek.com aviationweek.com

"Eventually, he said the pilot can be removed for remote operations, which will help achieve greater scale and further reduce operating costs."

We still have a long way to go before regulators are comfortable with these big machines flying around without pilots, especially over crowded urban areas. If their business plan depends on removing the pilot to achieve profitability then they're in trouble.

"The vehicle will get more affordable with scaled manufacturing, and the cost to operate the vehicle will come down as autonomous tech gets better."

There are many aviation experts who have thoroughly debunked the idea that an aircraft can ever be assembled as cheaply and as efficiently as you build cars. It doesn't matter if companies Joby are forming partnerships with auto companies like Toyota, there are limits on how quickly you can ramp up production of a complex aircraft like an eVTOL.

"But even if he’s right, investors in the eVTOL space should still prepare for the likely possibility of an extended period of subsidized operating losses."

This is the big issue that will likely kill off many operators and manufacturers and leave only the strongest companies standing. Even if you have a second generation version of your eVTOl on the drawing board that is a vast improvement over your current product, you may not get the funding to make it a reality.

Maybe well funded companies like Embraers's Eve Air Mobility who are taking their time to build a proper aircraft well suited for commercial ops may be the big winners in the long run. On a side note, they are starting work on a final assembly facility in Brazil with the first prototype coming together by the year's end and a projected maiden flight occurring by early 2024.

www.flyingmag.com

Embraer, Eve Air Mobility Announce First eVTOL Production Plant - FLYING Magazine

The new facility will support Eve’s entry into service in 2026, with the company planning launches on six continents.
www.flyingmag.com www.flyingmag.com
 
Last edited:
This misfortune will likely re-entrench the FAA to stall and hedge in it's best bureaucratic methods, as they did following the (then) AW-609 crash. I suspect that the suits are hoping that the funding for eVTOL will collapse and the whole idea becomes a blip in aeronautical history. They can then go on with what bureaucrats know/do best; status quo.
 
yasotay said:
This misfortune will likely re-entrench the FAA to stall and hedge in it's best bureaucratic methods, as they did following the (then) AW-609 crash. I suspect that the suits are hoping that the funding for eVTOL will collapse and the whole idea becomes a blip in aeronautical history. They can then go on with what bureaucrats know/do best; status quo.
Click to expand...
I don't actually think that's the case - FAA is under a lot of political pressure to not fuck up evtol the way they regulated the drone industry out of existence. The air force money going to Joby/Archer is an explicit industrial base effort.

What will kill evtol is their business models, which requires that they both build the aircraft and operate the airline. This is needed for the both the silicon valley style 'moat' and is also the only sensible business model for a company fielding an autonomy solution.

In the human aviation world, you do a good round of circular finger pointing to diffuse the blame. But none of this is viable in a centralized business model - you either sell a product with enough safety or the customers won't pay.

And while I have no statistics on that, I do have an anecdote - I've met one gazillionaire - and for a guy who cost is no object, he (or as he implied, his wife) decided it was irresponsible to fly in a helicopter as soon as he had a family.
 
verticalmag.com

A need for more aircraft maintenance engineers for eVTOL

As the eVTOL era approaches, the sector is preparing to close the knowledge gap for aircraft maintenance engineers to service next-generation eVTOL aircraft.
verticalmag.com verticalmag.com

A good article that highlights the need for skilled workers should this industry really take off.

Also, it appears that Ehang will be the very first company to cross the finish line and put their aircraft in commercial service.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1692842627446472942
View: https://twitter.com/vickyjingxiang/status/1692842627446472942
 
Last edited:
www.flyingmag.com

GAMA and Other Industry Groups Cast Shade on FAA Powered Lift Pilot Proposal - FLYING Magazine

GAMA and other groups hold enough political clout on Capitol Hill to potentially force the FAA’s hand and shape pieces of the proposal to their whim.
www.flyingmag.com www.flyingmag.com

This article explains in great detail the rules that the FAA wants to impose regarding eVTOL aircraft that the industry is pushing back against. The fact that no one is planning to build a dual control eVTOL or the fact that designing and certifying a level C simulator is going to be a very expensive and time consuming are two big problem areas.

Performance-Based eVTOL Energy Reserves Urged By Industry To FAA | Aviation Week Network

The deadline for comments on the FAA’s proposed regulations for operations of powered-lift aircraft closed on Aug. 14.
aviationweek.com aviationweek.com

www.ainonline.com

GAMA Calls for Performance-based Approach to eVTOL Aircraft Regulations | AIN

The General Aviation Manufacturers Association responded to the FAA's proposed Special Federal Aviation Regulation covering advanced air mobility operations.
www.ainonline.com www.ainonline.com

Another looming battle that could make or break many of these startups is the debate over how much energy reserves these aircraft should have. Right now, if the standard reserves needed for commercial IFR operations are imposed, some of these aircraft could have a severely restricted range. Personally, I don't think the FAA is going to budge on something critical like reserve energy. The only other electric aircraft available in the U.S. right now, the Pipistrel Electro, also has a relatively short endurance as a result of FAA reserve requirements.

www.avweb.com

Pipistrel Velis Flight Trial: Cool Airplane, Not For U.S. Market - AVweb

Pipistrel's Velis, the first certified electric airplane, is a technical tour de force. But its legs are far too short to make a realistic player in the U.S. market.
www.avweb.com www.avweb.com

www.avweb.com

Pipistrel Velis Electro: Certified Electric - AVweb

Although nicely executed, the Velis' endurance is too limited to make it practical for U.S.-style training. Operating costs are a moving target.
www.avweb.com www.avweb.com

​

 
Last edited:
verticalmag.com

Beta Technologies: Building a Beta Future

There’s a lot of engineering that goes on behind the doors of Vermont-based Beta Technologies. But the eVTOL developer is now starting a new chapter, as it gets ready to move from R&D to manufacturing.
verticalmag.com verticalmag.com

A good overview of how this project is going.
 
Investors will appreciate how Beta transforms their investment:

Copy-of-Wing-Flip-20200923_0017.jpg


Same with the avionic guys working crouched on the factory floor because nobody wanted to invest 2000$ of steel for a proper work bench...
 
alberchico said:
www.flyingmag.com

GAMA and Other Industry Groups Cast Shade on FAA Powered Lift Pilot Proposal - FLYING Magazine

GAMA and other groups hold enough political clout on Capitol Hill to potentially force the FAA’s hand and shape pieces of the proposal to their whim.
www.flyingmag.com www.flyingmag.com

This article explains in great detail the rules that the FAA wants to impose regarding eVTOL aircraft that the industry is pushing back against. The fact that no one is planning to build a dual control eVTOL or the fact that designing and certifying a level C simulator is going to be a very expensive and time consuming are two big problem areas.

Performance-Based eVTOL Energy Reserves Urged By Industry To FAA | Aviation Week Network

The deadline for comments on the FAA’s proposed regulations for operations of powered-lift aircraft closed on Aug. 14.
aviationweek.com aviationweek.com

www.ainonline.com

GAMA Calls for Performance-based Approach to eVTOL Aircraft Regulations | AIN

The General Aviation Manufacturers Association responded to the FAA's proposed Special Federal Aviation Regulation covering advanced air mobility operations.
www.ainonline.com www.ainonline.com

Another looming battle that could make or break many of these startups is the debate over how much energy reserves these aircraft should have. Right now, if the standard reserves needed for commercial IFR operations are imposed, some of these aircraft could have a severely restricted range. Personally, I don't think the FAA is going to budge on something critical like reserve energy. The only other electric aircraft available in the U.S. right now, the Pipistrel Electro, also has a relatively short endurance as a result of FAA reserve requirements.

www.avweb.com

Pipistrel Velis Flight Trial: Cool Airplane, Not For U.S. Market - AVweb

Pipistrel's Velis, the first certified electric airplane, is a technical tour de force. But its legs are far too short to make a realistic player in the U.S. market.
www.avweb.com www.avweb.com

www.avweb.com

Pipistrel Velis Electro: Certified Electric - AVweb

Although nicely executed, the Velis' endurance is too limited to make it practical for U.S.-style training. Operating costs are a moving target.
www.avweb.com www.avweb.com
Click to expand...
But... aren't those exactly the kind of conundrums that AI is supposed to breezily resolve for us??? Woe betide us...
 
alberchico said:
verticalmag.com

Beta Technologies: Building a Beta Future

There’s a lot of engineering that goes on behind the doors of Vermont-based Beta Technologies. But the eVTOL developer is now starting a new chapter, as it gets ready to move from R&D to manufacturing.
verticalmag.com verticalmag.com

A good overview of how this project is going.
Click to expand...
And nearly no information on how the VTOL part of Alia-250 is going. The CTOL version will be compromised relative to other electric CTOL aircraft because it was designed as a VTOL and the VTOL part doesn't appear to work. The 2 bladed lift rotors have large airfoil cross sections at the inboard end and no flapping compliance or clearance to the airframe. These rotors are going to generate huge 1/rev and 2/rev moments and vibrations in the airframe, probably larger than Beta expected. Beta can get Vertical to do a puff piece of journalism but the company is in trouble.
 
e-Graphite said:
And nearly no information on how the VTOL part of Alia-250 is going... The 2 bladed lift rotors have large airfoil cross sections at the inboard end and no flapping compliance or clearance to the airframe. These rotors are going to generate huge 1/rev and 2/rev moments and vibrations in the airframe, probably larger than Beta expected. Beta can get Vertical to do a puff piece of journalism but the company is in trouble.
Click to expand...
Stationary hover seems to work. I saw a videoclip somewhere. But especially excessive vibrations during transition is most likely the issue. Could be solved with a delta-three hinge. However, this adds weight and will require larger clearance to the airframe, which in turn will increase drag in cruise flight... Compromises.
To their credit, they have accumulated quite a lot CTOL flying hours and are one of the few to fly with a pilot on board!
 
e-Graphite said:
theaircurrent.com

Vertical Aerospace details failure sequence that preceded VX4 crash

Disclosure comes just weeks after flight testing mishap with the eVTOL prototype in the U.K.
theaircurrent.com theaircurrent.com

Good article on VX-4 crash, article should be free from paywall.
Click to expand...

Oh how the worm has turned….

A few years back, eVTOL’s major marketing claim was it’s simplicity equaled inherent safety…. A battery, a motor and a computer, ..easy peasy.

Now they’re “very complex machines”, “ when you put them all together you have a very complex system that’s difficult to model”

I note the next VX4 will be fitted with ejection seats.

,….. despite what’s still claimed by the eVTOL techies, they haven’t even scratched the surface yet regarding a real life operational environment.

A long long way to go, more crashes to come, vast indeed staggeringly eye watering amounts of cash….. must get some pop corn while it lasts .
 
Last edited:
www.easa.europa.eu

EASA proposes rules for VTOL operations, including air taxis | EASA

COLOGNE, Aug 31 – The European Union Aviation Safety Agency has proposed rules for safe operations of Vertical Take-Off and Landing aircraft (VTOL), which includes air taxis, paving the way for these innovative aircraft to take to the skies in Europe’s cities.
www.easa.europa.eu www.easa.europa.eu
 
@Zoo Tycoon
Many of the first designs have indeed been very simply, like the Ehang or Volocopter, which were based on well proven multicopper designs. Later on, most new designs started to squeeze out more range and speed with an highly variable design which requires a real transitioning phase. Furthermore, the variable pitch propellers were introduced, retractable landing gears and so on. All this was done before the simple designs even arrived in real world operations. Elice and Lilium are good examples of what has gone wrong.

It’s all about impressing investors by promising ever higher speeds and ranges. Despite that, I still believe a simple multicopper or an electric STOL plane for short ranges could work.
 
Nicknick said:
@Zoo Tycoon
Many of the first designs have indeed been very simply, like the Ehang or Volocopter, which were based on well proven multicopper designs. Later on, most new designs started to squeeze out more range and speed with an highly variable design which requires a real transitioning phase. Furthermore, the variable pitch propellers were introduced, retractable landing gears and so on. All this was done before the simple designs even arrived in real world operations. Elice and Lilium are good examples of what has gone wrong.

It’s all about impressing investors by promising ever higher speeds and ranges. Despite that, I still believe a simple multicopper or an electric STOL plane for short ranges could work.
Click to expand...

Multicopters for people movers is fundamentally uncompetitive and an uncomfortable flight experience.

All types of electric aeroplanes, sized for people carrying, are today limited by battery energy density such that they’re impractical.

Multicopter with fixed pitch propellers are speed limited by their basic flight physics*, to about one third of the speed attainable by a conventional helicopter architecture. Not to mention because to fly at max speed, they need to fly in a dramatically pitched down attitude, it’ll be pretty unpleasant for most folks.

Should a suitable aviation energy density battery appear it’ll be used in the conventional helicopter architecture, probably with an electric tail rotor, such as to offer 3x the speed of a multicopter, a pleasant ride all at zero emission. There’s only one way this’ll end.

So my bet is the people carrying multicopter will fade into history as a techno curiosity, or maybe become a sport like ballooning, kinda fun, great veiws, certainly expensive but pretty pointless.

* combined lift/thrust vector vs blade tip speed remaining subsonic
 
Last edited:
If the flight distance is only a few kilometer, the speed is not of great importance, I believe, most people will even enjoy the longer time im the air. Nose down attitude can be compensated by seat inclination, than you just have to lean backwards a bit during take off and landing, but you can enjoy the flight in comfort.

Multicopter are not a replacement for every helicopter application, but they are good enough for short flights over well known routs, eg. from an airport with an hotel in the city center. Or from the office building to youre home settlemet, which can be the safest way to get there in towns like Sao Paolo.
 

Opinion: eVTOL Makers Should Focus On Business Case To Achieve Success | Aviation Week Network

Overemphasizing technology and design can burn cash and slow certification.
aviationweek.com aviationweek.com

Long story short, by pursuing a conservative approach including collaborating with established suppliers, hiring workers who have previous experience in both the aerospace and automotive industry, and by moving ahead on the construction of a final assembly facility , Archer is poised to be one of the first entrants to go into large scale service. The fact that they are not designing proprietary systems for their eVTOL that will require a lengthy certification process like Joby gives them an advantage. However the Joby design is more refined and is expected to have better overall performance based on what I've read. It's going to be interesting to see in the years ahead which design succeeds.
 
Last edited:
GTX said:
www.defensenews.com

Joby’s air taxis to help US Air Force usher in electric aviation era

The vehicles will first be flown remotely to shuttle cargo around Edwards Air Force Base, followed by human pilots and passengers next year.
www.defensenews.com www.defensenews.com
Click to expand...
Not sure DoD should be in the business of subsidizing commercial start ups with no military application.

The idea of using eVTOLs for combat search & rescue for example is laughable given the payload/range requirements. Even SOF insertion a few dozen miles behind enemy lines would be challenging.
 
I think they are talking about Medevac and not CSAR.
The HH-60M is not an HH-60G or W. There have been discussions for long on how to replace the Medevac helo with something autonomous, quieter and more attritable for the last mile of flight.
It's then hard to see how flight trials can be seen as subsidies. Especially when most flights are overtly deemed unmanned on safety grounds...
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
alberchico said:
Some footage of the prototype being flown by a test pilot.
Click to expand...
After years of uncrewed flight testing it's good to see this aircraft, which is actually intended for passenger transport, finally with a human on board! Congratulations to Joby!

Who's next? ...Looking at you Lilium! :p
 
CycloTech has released renders of its vehicle, which uses drum rotors (unless they're wheels for the hamsters powering it).

www.cyclotech.at

CycloTech

CycloRotor next generation
www.cyclotech.at www.cyclotech.at

www.cyclotech.at

CruiseUp – first air car with CycloRotors - CycloTech

www.cyclotech.at www.cyclotech.at

www.carscoops.com

Weird New Flying Car Uses A Drum-Shaped Fan Instead Of Propellers To Fly | Carscoops

The wild-looking CycloTech CruiseUp has weirdly-oriented fans that allow to fly forward, backward, up, and down all without jostling occupants
www.carscoops.com www.carscoops.com

You might notice that it has six, not four rotors. Two are fore and aft on the main axis and apparently for lift only.
 

Attachments

  • 2023-CycloTech-CruiseUp-1-1536x864.jpg
    2023-CycloTech-CruiseUp-1-1536x864.jpg
    201.7 KB · Views: 22
  • 2023-CycloTech-CruiseUp-2-1536x1024.jpg
    2023-CycloTech-CruiseUp-2-1536x1024.jpg
    306.6 KB · Views: 17
  • 2023-CycloTech-CruiseUp-3-1536x1024.jpg
    2023-CycloTech-CruiseUp-3-1536x1024.jpg
    483.8 KB · Views: 21
www.flyingmag.com

Archer Secures $65 Million in Financing for ‘World’s Largest’ eVTOL Production Plant - FLYING Magazine

The fresh funding is expected to cover the majority of construction costs for Phase 1 of Archer’s scaled manufacturing plant.
www.flyingmag.com www.flyingmag.com

Archer finally moves ahead with their massive manufacturing facility. I don't really know if there ever will be a demand for so many of these machines to justify such a massive output.

investorplace.com

Kerrisdale Slams Joby Aviation (JOBY) Stock in New Short Report

JOBY stock is trending after Kerrisdale Capital released a short report on the electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) company.
investorplace.com investorplace.com

In other news, a critical report of the Joby eVTOL project has surfaced. Granted, this report was prepared by a short seller so they do have an agenda, but it nonetheless make for interesting reading. A direct link to the report is below.

 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom