VTOL On Demand Mobility


"We remain absolutely steadfast on going directly to an uncrewed aircraft. There is no backup in the plan and there are no hidden pilot flight controls on board the aircraft"


"Naturally, the regulations can be improved over time. For example, I’d love for there to be specific requirements for subjects like detect and avoid, but as for now, the default is see and avoid. We’ll make the arguments for waivers and exemptions, but we’ll get there over time as an industry."

Does anyone feel it is an extremely high risk strategy to design this aircraft to be fully autonomous from day one with no backup plan and hope that FAA regulations will be in place to permit commercial operations when this thing is ready to enter service ? The FAA is still dragging its feet when it comes to allowing tiny delivery drones to overfly populated areas but Wisk thinks that getting regulatory approval for a vehicle of this size to fly unmanned over cities will not present a massive hurdle ? With the exception of Ehang nobody else is planning to do autonomous operations from day one.
That's why Boeing bought them, presumably at a discount. Boeing is going to tell these cute silicon valley engineers that they're working on manned aviation, and then take the not quite FAA-rated autonomy software and sell it to the us government for nearly FAA aproved civilian airspace integrated military drones.

Geez, Boeing (of Starliner & 737 MAX fame) and an EVSTOL startup (lithium batteries flying taxis, yeah !) picking a - doomed - fight with the FAA (ask SpaceX and Musk what they think of them !) over autonomous flight. Just because lithium batteries can't afford the weight of a pilot (and enough passengers, or any, but that's another story for another day).

What. could. possibly. go. wrong. ?
 

“We just could not close the business case for eVTOL using near-term technologies,” says Electra Vice President and General Manager J.P. Stewart"

I'm glad someone inside the electric aircraft industry is finally admitting it. But the business case for large numbers of this type of aircraft is a bit shaky too. There have many attempts in the past to create an aircraft whose short field performance was so good that Stolports would be built to accommodate them, like the Dash-7 and Twin Otter. With the exception of London City Airport, that concept has largely failed. Their earlier proposal (which has been removed from their website) that freight companies could build a small runway on their industrial sites to accommodate this aircraft also fail to take into account the NIMBY factor, as well as local laws and zoning regulations.

If anyone wants to know more about STOLports, this article explains the concept:

 
Eureka ! We need to bring back Breguet's 941, except with lithium batteries. Presently calling Dassault, on the other side of Bordeaux, my homeplace (Mérignac).
 
Please feel free to research my definition of ''rainbow technology" in the "Black projects: can we agree to disagree?" thread on this forum.
 
Last edited:

"The top air speed remains unchanged at 100 km/h (62 mph), but the per-charge range has increased to 15 km (9.3 miles) for point-to-point inner city hops or short sightseeing tours."

Once you factor in VFR reserves, I don't know how practical this aircraft is going to be for any applications with such extremely limited range.
 
No, in some towns (Sao Paulo, Berlin, Duisburg, Offenbach, St. Denis.....) the competing design would be a personal tank. Using cable cars is becomming increasingly dangerous....
 
Wisk prototype generations: 6
Wisk operational craft in service: 0
 
Last edited:
No, in some towns (Sao Paulo, Berlin, Duisburg, Offenbach, St. Denis.....) the competing design would be a personal tank. Using cable cars is becomming increasingly dangerous....
Not to hijack the thread with a new topic, but there is a very famous, lean, friendly and efficient cable car service running in one of the, once flagged, most dangerous city of the world that directly connect the low income area to the city center in... Medellin.
I have used it as a foreigner with consistency, so I would tend to differ from your opinion.

 
Last edited:
I don't want to start a political disscussion, but more than 21,000 knife attacks anually and people beeing regularily pushed on the rails are reasons to avoid puplic transportation at least in Germany...
 
From the wiki link:
Studies have suggested strong correlations between the intervention of the Metrocables and dramatic reductions in crime associated with the areas where Medellín Metrocable has been introduced.

Another advantage of cable cars is that this is not a mass transportation system per se. They are like taxis services, moving, in some cities, a gargantuan amount of people without having to pack them by hundreds. This tend to average the rate of aggressive behavior with overal statistics.
 
We need more EVSTOL companies with the same pioneering spirit as Branson's Virgin or Oceangate. Screws those pesky regulations, hail libertarianism like Peter Thiel, they are the future of mankind... I mean, just read that inspirational interview with him


“At some point, safety just is pure waste,” Stockton told journalist David Pogue in an interview last year. “I mean, if you just want to be safe, don’t get out of bed. Don’t get in your car. Don’t do anything.”

In another interview, Stockton boasted that he’d “broken some rules” in his career.

“I think it was General MacArthur who said you’re remembered for the rules you break,” Rush said in a video interview with Mexican YouTuber Alan Estrada last year. “And I’ve broken some rules to make this. I think I’ve broken them with logic and good engineering behind me.”

Wait, forget that.
 
i was thinking about trams (like the cable cars in San Francisco) when I heard the term cable cars. I do agree, that this is a good approach for many cities, especially those with a hilly terain, but it doesnt compete with a flexibel system for individuals.
 

An extremely detailed analysis of whether Lilium's concept is feasible.
Yeah the analysis is ok. Feasible is the wrong term. It should be: is it economically viable with the attached concept of operation.
 
More of an overview mixed with a sales pitch, but may be of interest. Frank Stephenson is a highly acclaimed designer, having worked on important projects for BMW (its first SUV), Ferrari, Maserati, McLaren.

View:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn0_jPmfnbQ

He’s by his own admission not an engineer, and currently making loads of money out of graphic design consultancy to eVTOL companies, a booming business for these start ups. So of course he’s going to promote this as the best thing since sliced bread. Follow the money as they say.

BTW on his website, he claims to have “designed” the Lilium (as director of Design 2018-2019), but the 2019 Red Dot “design” award went to Mathis Cosson. Remember “design” here means selecting curves that are pleasing to the eye, rather than the fundamentally difficult issue of battery chemistry.
 
Last edited:
Follow the money as they say.

BTW on his website, he claims to have “designed” the Lilium (as director of Design 2018-2019), but the 2019 Red Dot “design” award went to Mathis Cosson. Remember “design” here means selecting curves that are pleasing to the eye, rather than the fundamentally difficult issue of battery chemistry.
Indeed.

Designers straddle the space between engineering and styling. Towards the engineering end, they deal with ergonomics and packaging, having to accomodate aesthetic ideas with the requirements of legislation (which can be incredibly detailed and restrictive if you're wondering why all cars tend to look alike) and engineering (also heavily constrained by legislation - safety in a crash and all that). Luigi Colani, who has been discussed elsewhere, has tilted far more towards styling and an 'idea' of aerodynamics rather than its reality when he's ventured into transport design.

It's interesting that Lilium got someone known for car design and it probably reveals something about their attitude or aspiration towards EVTOL vehicles as a realisation of Blade Runner's spinners versus Airbus and most others, which see them as a class of helicopter.

In the area of battery chemistry, there has been a lot of talk about imminent breakthroughs with solid state batteries which may push a lot of concepts over the line into actual economic viability. In a few years. Like fusion.
 
Last edited:

This could be a serious issue for rooftop operations in urban areas.
 

This could be a serious issue for rooftop operations in urban areas.
The article focuses on power demands during turbulent takeoff/landing operations but nearly all of these eVTOL multirotor configurations appear to have weak yaw control in VTOL operations which also doesn’t bode well for rooftop landing pads.
 

These guys are up to something, all very hush hush.


Regards,
 
Another horror:

View: https://youtu.be/5oiWtYLA-Go


When will we have breathalyzers mandatory for drafting tables?
Well, now they're going to have a go at certifying it! More at the link - https://www.compositesworld.com/new...-evtol-progresses-with-faa-type-certification
Certified? You'd need to be certified to go anywhere near the thing (etc etc)... ;)
 
There is a new idea for E-Stol (here it' a hybrid), which I find very promising:
I suppose this approach is easier for home build to modify it but I would think that electric motor clutched to main prop is neater. Maybe combined with clutch to compressor and pipe for blown ailerons. Then you've greater cruise efficiency.
 
The trick is, that the props not only improve STOL capabilities and handling at low speed, but are also hidden in the wing during the flight, You can’t do that in a conventional layout and the efficiency of any solution which blows air through pipes will always be nasty. Pipes cause a lot of resistance and using a small amount of air with high velocity at slow speeds is terrible inefficient. The amount of effort would also be much higher than adding two electric motors with props.

We can see many EVTOL which turn their two bladed lifting props in longitudinal orientation to reduce drag, but this arrangement is by far less efficient than hiding the props in the wings.
 

Just a quick summary of NASA's abandonment of their electric aircraft project and the gloomy picture it paints for the electric aviation industry in general.
 
Notice the disc rotor size, away from your typical Evtol:

Textron-eAviation_9069.jpg



Notice also that the articulation of inner rotor would indicate a two lift plan in vertical mode, with one rotor disc higher than the other.

The concept also appears to be scalable, at least moderately with the balance in moment done by sizing the pitch rotors (at the back of each booms).

Just an assumption but I would guess batteries are in rear end of each booms, a safe place in regard to passengers safety.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom