Iranians fished out one of the new Anduril Dive LD USVs
View attachment 823374
View attachment 823375
View attachment 823377
View attachment 823378
The usn received its first one back in april last yearInteresting. I had not heard about a specific purchase of these, though I assumed the USN had to have tested them.
https://www.twz.com/sea/everything-we-know-about-the-u-s-navys-submersible-drone-iran-just-capturedAnduril's Dive-LD uncrewed underwater vehicle falling into Iranian hands is significant, but the system was designed to be risked in contested waters.
Why I laughed when the pentagon said no worries it's an "older model"The usn received its first one back in april last year
https://defence-blog.com/us-navy-receives-first-dive-ld-drone-submarine/
I did some work on XLUUV and frankly the assumption is that--yes, you'll probably lose one or two of these eventually. There's nothing particularly spicy from an engineering/classification perspective in them.It's funny undoubtedly, but it kinda highlights the issue that unmanned systems can simply be boarded or just straight up stolen. And it's not new, happened to RQ-170 back then too, made to crash land in Iran to be picked up for examination.
I'd expect that the crypto for the datalinks would be the highest value of what was capturable.I did some work on XLUUV and frankly the assumption is that--yes, you'll probably lose one or two of these eventually. There's nothing particularly spicy from an engineering/classification perspective in them.
Not really.I'd think the 6000-meter-capable pressure hull engineering/metallurgy might be a concern.