• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

TSR.201

PlanesPictures

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
974
Reaction score
437
What I found
 

Attachments

  • TSR.201.jpg
    TSR.201.jpg
    55.9 KB · Views: 175
  • TSR.201b.jpg
    TSR.201b.jpg
    430.7 KB · Views: 246

Rickshaw

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
2,023
Reaction score
106
An interesting concept. However, as it points out, doing so much work on the original design would have had a prohibitive cost on the design's range/payload. Personally, re-engining I think would have been quite a good idea. More modern, more fuel-efficient turbofans would have ensured a better range/payload at minimal cost. Ditto with more modern, digital avionics. The RAAF did something similar with its F-111s when they rebuilt them - zero hours and digital avionics. It was a shame that in the end the fuel seal/deseal problem and the accompany Occ. Health and Safety considerations for the groundcrew tasked with their sealing/desealing forced their early retirement.
 

PlanesPictures

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
974
Reaction score
437
And I found source, too

http://www.ultraligero.net/Cursos/diseno/La_anatomia_del_aeroplano.pdf
 

Similar threads

Top