Sukhoi FSW Fighters from S-22 / S-32 to S-37 / Su-47 Berkut

1. I think that modified Su-47 with thrust vectoring engine (AL-37FU or AL-41F) was the final shape of S-32 concept.
2, Existing S-32 images or model picture shows that S-32 was too heavy because of large flat plate thrust vectoring exhaust nozzle.
3. Some document says that F-22 can do every maneuver that X-29 did.
4. So perhaps Su-57 can do every maneuver that modified Su-47 can do.
5. FSW's L/D is not large at over Mach 1.3 region compared with Sweep back wing, FSW is not suitable for supercruiser.
6. FSW fighter is hard to design. (Because of wing divergence problem and complicated flight control system).
7. I believe that FSW fighter has no merit today.
(Perhaps Su-27KM exhaust nozzle design was different from S-32 exhaust nozzle.)
 
Last edited:
There are no any photos of inside of initial weapon bays(primary and secondary) in internet. Only photos after conversion to PAKFA test lab.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_E4137.JPG
    IMG_E4137.JPG
    120.8 KB · Views: 295
  • shape_1.jpg
    shape_1.jpg
    792 KB · Views: 300
  • shape_2.jpg
    shape_2.jpg
    588.5 KB · Views: 351

Attachments

  • P1010367.JPG
    P1010367.JPG
    1.4 MB · Views: 328
In Progress Pics, one in Flight Position and one on display Position
 

Attachments

  • C273F5DB-C7F4-418A-BFA7-7F122DFF4857.jpeg
    C273F5DB-C7F4-418A-BFA7-7F122DFF4857.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 241
  • 852D1A05-A15A-445E-AD94-B0DEB3FAC44E.jpeg
    852D1A05-A15A-445E-AD94-B0DEB3FAC44E.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 248
  • 0CC2A4B1-6F03-4424-8919-D2B35C76859A.jpeg
    0CC2A4B1-6F03-4424-8919-D2B35C76859A.jpeg
    976 KB · Views: 236
  • 5C5C796F-9CA8-4562-AB91-BAD876BE48C4.jpeg
    5C5C796F-9CA8-4562-AB91-BAD876BE48C4.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 238
  • A6095C4F-1FE7-459D-AEEE-92A1748585F6.jpeg
    A6095C4F-1FE7-459D-AEEE-92A1748585F6.jpeg
    4.3 MB · Views: 279
I can't find three side view drawing of this aircraft.
Perhaps Praray-san has it.
 
Are there any blueprints of the Sukhoi S-22?

I‘d like to make a scale model of it.
 

Attachments

  • 73B05F0A-43BE-4050-852E-A2EE2C208990.png
    73B05F0A-43BE-4050-852E-A2EE2C208990.png
    1 MB · Views: 309
  • 44281F0E-3DDC-4C4A-B7B5-E948911455A9.png
    44281F0E-3DDC-4C4A-B7B5-E948911455A9.png
    818.1 KB · Views: 299
There are some opinions about Su-47 engine replacement plan.
(1) D-30F6(15.5ton A/B)⇒AL-37FU(14.5ton A/B)
(2) D-30F6⇒AL-41F(17.6ton A/B)
So the Al-37fu was built? I’ve always be curious about it.
 
I thought the nose was too small but I’ve heard reports that bars could be installed on conventional nosed Su-27 so it makes sense. Thank you!
 
Had known that at already at an early stage the whole FSW Project of Sukhoi had always also an Navy version in mind and the S-32, and so on where shown in drawings and desktop models with tailhook. Also, a Navy-Version needs folding wings to save space on the aircraftcarrier. Often its said that the real build Su-47 has a tailhook. But I never had seen a photo of the Su-47 with a tailhook. and in the new Su-57 book from Yefim Gordon is nothing written about it. But from this book ilearnd that the Su-47 has manualy folding wing. The is als one photo. Does anyone know a photo showing the Su-47's tailhook (if it exists). Does anyone know a photo showing the Su-47 with folded wings from a different viewpoint (sideview,..) ? IMG_20220112_235221.jpg
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom