blackkite
Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
- Joined
- 31 May 2007
- Messages
- 9,419
- Reaction score
- 9,273
1. I think that modified Su-47 with thrust vectoring engine (AL-37FU or AL-41F) was the final shape of S-32 concept.
2, Existing S-32 images or model picture shows that S-32 was too heavy because of large flat plate thrust vectoring exhaust nozzle.
3. Some document says that F-22 can do every maneuver that X-29 did.
4. So perhaps Su-57 can do every maneuver that modified Su-47 can do.
5. FSW's L/D is not large at over Mach 1.3 region compared with Sweep back wing, FSW is not suitable for supercruiser.
6. FSW fighter is hard to design. (Because of wing divergence problem and complicated flight control system).
7. I believe that FSW fighter has no merit today.
(Perhaps Su-27KM exhaust nozzle design was different from S-32 exhaust nozzle.)
2, Existing S-32 images or model picture shows that S-32 was too heavy because of large flat plate thrust vectoring exhaust nozzle.
3. Some document says that F-22 can do every maneuver that X-29 did.
4. So perhaps Su-57 can do every maneuver that modified Su-47 can do.
5. FSW's L/D is not large at over Mach 1.3 region compared with Sweep back wing, FSW is not suitable for supercruiser.
6. FSW fighter is hard to design. (Because of wing divergence problem and complicated flight control system).
7. I believe that FSW fighter has no merit today.
(Perhaps Su-27KM exhaust nozzle design was different from S-32 exhaust nozzle.)
Last edited: