SpaceX (general discussion)

IAU issues a statement on the BlueWalker 3 satellite, now confirmed as one of the brightest objects in the night sky. “BlueWalker 3 is a big shift in the constellation satellite issue and should give us all reason to pause” https://iau.org/news/pressreleases/detail/iau2211/
View: https://twitter.com/Astro_Jonny/status/1597334648908308480
The International Astronomical Union Center for the Protection of the Dark and Quiet Sky from Satellite Constellation Interference expresses concern about the recently launched prototype BlueWalker 3 satellite’s impact on astronomy. New measurements reveal that this low Earth orbiting satellite is now one of the brightest objects in the night sky, outshining all but the brightest stars. In addition, the satellite’s use of terrestrial radio frequencies poses a new challenge to radio astronomy.

On 10 September 2022 AST SpaceMobile launched a prototype satellite called BlueWalker 3 into low Earth orbit. This satellite, which has a 64-square-meter (693-square-foot) antenna system (the largest commercial antenna system ever deployed into low Earth orbit), is the first of what is expected to be more than a hundred similar or even larger satellites.

New measurements by observers worldwide, coordinated by the International Astronomical Union’s CPS (IAU Center for the Protection of the Dark and Quiet Sky from Satellite Constellation Interference), show that this satellite has become one of the brightest objects in the night sky — more so than other constellation satellites and at times as bright as some of the most recognizable stars [1].

Besides their visible brightness, these new satellites, which serve as “cell phone towers in space,” will transmit strong radio waves at frequencies currently reserved for terrestrial cell-phone communications. These orbiting transmitters, which are not subject to the same radio quiet zone restrictions [2] as ground-based cellular networks, have the potential to severely impact radio astronomy research as well as geodesy studies and space-physics experiments.

The IAU and its CPS co-hosts, NSF's NOIRLab and the SKA Observatory (SKAO), are concerned about the impact these satellites will have on fundamental research and humanity’s ability to experience the natural night sky.

“Astronomers build radio telescopes as far away as possible from human activity, looking for places on the planet where there is limited or no cell phone coverage. Frequencies allocated to cell phones are already challenging to observe even in radio quiet zones we have created for our facilities. New satellites such as BlueWalker 3 have the potential to worsen this situation and compromise our ability to do science if not properly mitigated,”said SKAO Director-General Philip Diamond. “This is a key reason why the SKAO is deeply involved in the IAU CPS and promoting the equitable and sustainable use of space.”

The night sky is a unique laboratory that allows scientists to conduct experiments that cannot be done in terrestrial laboratories. Astronomical observations have provided insights into fundamental physics and other research at the boundaries of our knowledge and changed humanity’s view of our place in the cosmos. The pristine night sky is also an important part of humanity’s shared cultural heritage and should be protected for society at large and for future generations.

“BlueWalker 3 is a big shift in the constellation satellite issue and should give us all reason to pause,” said Piero Benvenuti, Director of the IAU CPS.

The IAU and CPS partners recognize that the new satellite constellations have an important role in improving worldwide communications. However, their interference with astronomical observations could severely hamper progress in our understanding of the cosmos. Their deployment should therefore be conducted with due consideration of their side effects and with efforts made to minimize their impact on astronomy.

To better understand the effects of these new satellites, the IAU CPS invites further observations of BlueWalker 3. Visual and telescopic observations of BlueWalker 3 can be submitted onlineto SatHub, a worldwide public observing initiative of the IAU CPS.

The IAU recently wrote a letter on behalf of the global astronomy community to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) urging them to seriously consider the potential impacts of satellite constellations on astronomy, the appearance of the night sky, and the environment. Earlier this month, the FCC announced its intention to create an office dedicated to space, to better deal with this rapidly emerging issue, an action that the IAU CPS applauds.

Conversations between the IAU CPS and AST SpaceMobile have started. The IAU CPS fosters dialogue and cooperation between satellite operators and scientists. Recent discussions with some operators have led to mitigation measures but much more work is needed.

Notes​

[1] The measurements show that BlueWalker 3 is around apparent visual magnitude 1 at its brightest — almost as bright as Antares or Spica (the 15th and 16th brightest stars in the night sky). Apparent magnitude in astronomy is a measure of the brightness of a star or other astronomical object as observed from Earth. The scale is reverse logarithmic: the brighter an object is, the lower its magnitude number. The brightest astronomical objects have negative apparent magnitudes: for example, Venus at −4.2 or Sirius at −1.46. The faintest stars visible with the naked eye on the darkest night have apparent magnitudes of about +6.5.

[2] There are several areas around the globe that have special protections for radio astronomy that prescribe how fixed radio transmitters can be used so they do not interfere with astronomical observations. The United States National Radio Quiet Zone is a 13,000 square mile (34,000 square kilometer) region in which broadcast antennas must operate at reduced power and use highly directional antennas.

More information​

The IAU is the international astronomical organization that brings together more than 12 000 active professional astronomers from more than 100 countries worldwide. Its mission is to promote and safeguard astronomy in all its aspects, including research, communication, education and development, through international cooperation. The IAU also serves as the internationally recognised authority for assigning designations to celestial bodies and the surface features on them. Founded in 1919, the IAU is the world's largest professional body for astronomers.

Links​

Contacts​

Siegfried Eggl
Co-Lead, Sathub, University of Illinois
Email: eggl@illinois.edu

Mike Peel
Co-Lead, Sathub, Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias
Email: mpeel@iac.es

Piero Benvenuti
Director of the IAU Centre for the Protection of the Dark and Quiet Sky from Satellite Constellation Interference
Email: piero.benvenuti@cps.iau.org

Constance E. Walker
NSF’s NOIRLab
Co-Director of the IAU Center for the Protection of Dark and Quiet Sky from Satellite Constellation Interference Email: connie.walker@noirlab.edu

Federico Di Vruno
Co-Director of the IAU Centre for the Protection of the Dark and Quiet Sky from Satellite
Constellation Interference, SKAO Email: federico.divruno@cps.iau.org

Lars Lindberg Christensen
IAU Director of Communications
Tel: +1 520 461 0433
Cell: +49 173 38 72 621
Email: lars.christensen@noirlab.edu

 
Let's admit it, folks, one of the many attractions of aerospace in general and rocketry in particular are the blooper reels of utterly spectacular failures, at least when nobody got hurt in the process.
 
This Tweet below label this building as Warehouse
It belog to SpaceX and is nearby TESLA GigaTexas and Boring Company HQ in Texas.
Why do i have the suspicion this building is new HQ and Production site for SpaceX and Musk say Adios to California ?

View: https://twitter.com/JoeTegtmeyer/status/1597293218542260224
I don’t think they encountered that tough caliche of “No Country For Old Men” but basements—let alone tunnel—are rare in Texas:

As for the RUD…better on the stand than on the rocket
 
Last edited:
Launch date is now TBD.
the Reason is launch seclude for December
08 dec. OneWeb flight #15 with 40 satellites
13 dec. O3b flight with 7 MEO satellites
15 dec. SWOT by NASA and ESA
mid dec. Transporter-6, SmallSat Rideshare
29 dec. Spy sat launch for Israel
and at least four Starlink launches !
this is every Week one to three launches

i guess that Hakuto-R will fly in January 2023.
 
Successful USSF-44 Launch ‘Sign of What’s to Come’

EL SEGUNDO, Calif. -- The successful U.S. Space Force USSF-44 mission launch was notable for several reasons: it was the first National Security Space Launch (NSSL) on a Falcon Heavy rocket and the first Falcon Heavy launch since June of 2019.

But Dr. Walter Lauderdale, Space Systems Command's chief of Falcon Systems & Operations and USSF-44 Mission director, said what made the launch unique “and a sign of what’s to come,” was the fact that the Nov. 1 launch included a variety of payloads from multiple commercial and government mission partners, all successfully deployed into geosynchronous orbit (GEO).

“USSF-44 highlighted the kinds of ways we need to work together to accomplish that objective,” Lauderdale said. “We will see more of that – we need to be learning from these campaigns and taking those ‘lessons learned’ as an entire command and putting it into what we do for the future, to make sure we’re ready for 2026.”

SSC and its industry and mission partners have maintained a 100 percent mission success rate for launches conducted under the NSSL program since 2003, and USSF-44 continued that record.

USSF-44 launched from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, using a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket. The rocket’s two side boosters were recovered on land and will be reused for the USSF-67 launch in January 2023, Lauderdale said.

The Falcon Heavy can lift nearly 64 metric tons (140,660 lbm) to low Earth orbit (LEO) and 58,860 lbm to geosynchronous orbit (GEO). The Falcon Heavy is comprised of a center core and two side core boosters, each with nine Merlin engines, totaling 27 Merlin rocket engines that produce roughly five million pounds of thrust at liftoff.

“The whole concept of reuse which SpaceX has matured in a tremendous way – you don’t want to throw away rockets that can be used again if you don’t have to,” Lauderdale noted.

In order to reuse the rocket boosters, they have to have enough fuel to bring them back in a safe and controlled manner, Lauderdale said. Landing on the ground is one thing, but SpaceX also has landed boosters on drone ships in the ocean, where the water is constantly moving.

“If you have a drone ship, you have to worry about how bumpy the ocean is – that could make recovery more hazardous for the rocket coming back,” Lauderdale said. “The waves are going up and down, the ship is going up and down six and seven feet – that’s going to affect the ability to make a safe landing.”

GEO orbits also can be more difficult to obtain than LEO, Lauderdale noted. More propulsion is needed to reach GEO, which is about 22,000 miles above Earth. In order to be in a particular orbit, an object also must be traveling at a certain speed – either from the rocket itself, or the satellite’s own propulsion mechanisms.

Often, satellites will be deposited in a transfer orbit, at the perigee – the point closest to Earth – and finish the ellipse to the apogee, or point farthest from the Earth, Lauderdale said. If the rocket does the work, more of the satellite’s mass can be dedicated to its capabilities; if a transfer orbit is used, it may mean a cheaper rocket ride, but then part of the satellite’s mass is going to be dedicated to propulsion.

USSF-44 included six payloads on one satellite that advance communications, space weather sensing, and other technologies into near-geosynchronous orbits.

Managing multiple payloads isn’t just a matter of weight and size. Some payloads need to be kept at certain temperatures, others need power or fuel. To accomplish this, USSF-44 used the Long Duration Propulsive EELV (Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle) Secondary Payload Adapter (ESPA). The LDPE-2 is a spacecraft built around the ESPAStar Bus, developed by Northrop Grumman, and provides added propulsion, power, and avionics subsystems enabling operations as a fully functional satellite, said Lt. Col. Michael Rupp, materiel leader for the LDPE and Rooster programs at SSC.

"ESPAStar vehicles can use excess payload space on launches and our streamlined integration process allows for unification at the launch site," said Troy Brashear, vice president, national security systems, Northrop Grumman. "These capabilities enhance mission value and redefine rapid access to space as we provide the U.S. Space Force with the technology to make their missions more efficient."

The six payloads included three separable and three hosted payloads on LDPE-2. The separable payloads – which will fly independently – included Alpine, a Millennium Space Systems program to demonstrate GEO small satellite designs and leverage commercial GEO communications; Linus, a Lockheed Martin Independent Research and Development GEO servicing risk reduction effort; and Tetra-1, an SSC prototype small satellite designed as a pathfinder for streamlined acquisition processes, innovative methods of space vehicle design and on-orbit Tactics Techniques and Procedures development.

The hosted payloads - which stay attached to the LDPE-2 in orbit - include: Mustang, a small size/weight/power communications experiment; Xenon, a commercial off-the-shelf component maturation for flight at GEO; and Energetic Charged Particle-Lite, an SSC space weather sensor.

“A lot of this is tech demonstration to make sure that we can get the capabilities to meet the coming challenges later in the decade,” Lauderdale said.

“We’re working with these multiple payloads, making sure they don’t cause any harm to each other, working through the integration issues and staying on the schedule so that we can safely deliver every one of them to their orbits and bring this new capability to the warfighter,” Lauderdale said.

“Our space capabilities are supporting our terrestrial forces in accomplishing our nation’s objectives,” Lauderdale said. “That’s a key role. One of the things we see is an asymmetric threat from our near peers – they are going to look to attack some of our strengths and try to interfere with the capabilities we can deliver from and through space to the warfighter.”

“We are looking for how we can rapidly reconstitute and deliver capabilities,” in the event some space assets are damaged or destroyed, Lauderdale said. “These kinds of multi-manifested missions, where you have all these disparate payloads, they provide us the ability to deliver multiple things into different places. It’s part of a layered strategy for getting mission capability on orbit.”

LDPE-2 has now completed its month-long post-launch checkout phase, and is in the process of deploying the three separable payloads into their respective orbits, Rupp said. LDPE-2, with the remaining three payloads on board, will be in GEO orbit for a one-year mission life, with the space vehicle being operated from the Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Support Complex at Kirtland AFB, New Mexico.

“LDPE has propulsion so it can move these satellites around in orbit and place them exactly where they want to be,” Rupp said. “It’s a coordinated effort between SSC and the mission partners as to when they want to be deployed and where they need to be to maximize their testing and prototyping.”

This is the second launch to use the LDPE satellite, Rupp noted. The first was the STP-3 launch in late 2021, the second was USSF-44, and the third will be USSF-67 in January 2023.

“We’re launching two satellites within 70 days of one another, which is fantastic from a program perspective,” Rupp said.

“The real benefit of the LDPE program is to essentially provide a ride for these smaller payloads,” Rupp said. “The mission partners are able to cheaply and rapidly test out and prototype these capabilities and insert them into future programs without having to spend a lot of time and resources doing it themselves. It enables that technology insertion to get after the fight now.”

“We had a great launch and we’re really happy with the partnership between SSC Launch Enterprise and SpaceX – our work started then, but it didn’t end there,” Rupp said. “We’re looking forward to our year of mission life and to future success.”

 
Launch date is now provisionally the 7th December.
Launch date is now TBD.
Launch date is now the 11th December.

View: https://twitter.com/ispace_hakuto_r/status/1600420652472619008


Notice of scheduled launch date:
Thank you for always supporting "HAKUTO-R".

As a result of discussions with SpaceX, ispace has decided to update the scheduled launch date for Mission 1 to Sunday, December 11, 16:38 (Japan time).
 
Launch date is now the 11th December.
nice that SpaceX proof me wrong

08 dec. OneWeb flight #15 with 40 satellites from LP39A
11 dec. Hakuto-R flight to Moon on SLC-40
O3b flight with 7 MEO satellites is moved back since original planned to use SLC-40 on 15 Dec.
Seems that what launch pad is refurbish first after launches will have the O3b flight.
 
Again SpaceX delivers
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXXJAYZ_Ci8

I'm surprised how many people are on Beach at sunrise to see the 188th flight of Falcon 9
guess its for this
FjfZ-dIX0AAI9Ey


Lucky fellow...
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFIuzormhYU
 
List of Crew for Dear Moon

Prime Crew:
Yusaku Maezawa - Japanese entrepreneur.
Steve Aoki - US DJ
Rhiannon Adam - Analog Photographer
Yemi A.D. - Czech Dancer
TOP [Choi Seung Hyun) - Korean musician
Tim Dodd - US YouTuber specialised on Space Flight.
Karim Iliyan - British Photographer
Dev D. Joshi - Indian actor
Brendan Hall - US Filmmaker

Backup crew:
Miyu - Japanese Dancer/Artist
Kaitlyn Farrington - US professional snowboarder

WTF ?
No Painter, No illustrator, No Poet, No author, No philosopher
but Snowboarder in backup crew
So much for Artist to Moon, Meh...

(note i'm illustrator and i not apply for Dear Moon)
 
Because some of his suggestions might be less than helpful? Like 2018, proposing a miniature submarine to save the Thai youth football team that were stuck in a cave? Cue hissy fit.
 
I'd rather ask this question here rather than NSF.

Why on Earth does it takes so long for Booster-7 / Starship-24 to fly ? Is there something wrong happening at Boca Chica ? Are they running into unexpected issues ?
 

From various things I've read (admittedly anecdotal) SpaceX folks spend or used to spend a lot of time "managing" Musk, finding ways to lead him to their preferred solutions, avoid working on crazy ideas, etc.
Sounds like something I'd expect from a disgruntled employee.

Sometimes employees get disgruntled because their bosses are assholes. It's not an accident that SpaceX has a very high turnover rate. There's clearly something off in management culture there and the boss is the place to start looking, based on his current behavior at Twitter.
 

From various things I've read (admittedly anecdotal) SpaceX folks spend or used to spend a lot of time "managing" Musk, finding ways to lead him to their preferred solutions, avoid working on crazy ideas, etc.
Sounds like something I'd expect from a disgruntled employee.

Sometimes employees get disgruntled because their bosses are assholes. It's not an accident that SpaceX has a very high turnover rate. There's clearly something off in management culture there and the boss is the place to start looking, based on his current behavior at Twitter.
If anything it's exemplary. He demands a lot from his employees. If you can't hack it maybe it's not for you. (Not you specifically.)
 
Twenty years ago, I worked for a company that was on the brink of failure after some over-ambitious takeovers. Upper management had already been replaced a year or so earlier, but the change in the company's policies took a little while to take effect. A turnaround eventually happened, the new CEO, rightly or wrongly, claimed responsibility for the company's new found succes. At one point, in an interview, he claimed people joined the company because of his great reputation as a manager. He then proceeded to lead the company to the brink of ruin for the second time, by newer, ever more ambitious takeovers. This time, fifteen years ago, the company was gobbled up by another company - after a mass exodus of personnel. I was one of those who voted with their feet. Search for Getronics and CEO Klaas Wagenaar. Sometimes the people that just can't hack it are right at the top.

We did have a really good laugh at Klaas after his interview, though.
 
Last edited:

From various things I've read (admittedly anecdotal) SpaceX folks spend or used to spend a lot of tim "managing" Musk, finding ways to lead him to their preferred solutions, avoid working on crazy ideas,

Yes, I've heard similar. Here's something I came across on twitter copied from tumblr. Can't speak to its accuracy though:

20221210_115025.png
 

From various things I've read (admittedly anecdotal) SpaceX folks spend or used to spend a lot of tim "managing" Musk, finding ways to lead him to their preferred solutions, avoid working on crazy ideas,

Yes, I've heard similar. Here's something I came across on twitter copied from tumblr. Can't speak to its accuracy though:

View attachment 688879
That's been making the rounds for some time. An intern whining about hair plugs. Yeah, I'm sure he was dialed in at the highest levels.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom